KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,990
- Reaction score
- 41,579
- Points
- 103
I totally buy that there was tension created by how to present Trevor. For myself more or less the way the 2009 DTV did it is the best. He's not a "wimp" but it's obvious who the focus and the main character and "hero" of the piece is. It's Diana. I can see the WB people guiding the DCCU saying, "you can't get too radical here, because if Trevor comes off as a wimp and incompetent there is a good slice of the target audience that will be turned off and wonder (no pun) what the Amazing Amazon sees in him in the first place?"
Not too mention, even in the male led Supehero films, what type of characterization and plot use do we prefer these days? I will take TAS-M's Gwen Stacy over the Raimi films' Mary Jane any day of the week. Give me Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle over Katie Holmes' Racheal. I mean even if you are being saved by the hero at least be a character with some meat on your bones and being presented well ala Adams or Kidder's Losis Lane, neither of which came off as incompetent or being there just to be eye candy.
Apply those same rules to Trevor, just admit up front that he's about out of his depth, as any normal, mortal man would be, when dealing with the powers and machinations of gods and monsters and other sernatural forces. That's fine. If Maclaren was thinking of presenting him like a male Dunst styled Mary Jane, then I get why that could be seen as a problem, while getting why she would see that as a natural gender flip move given the genre and the character. I just think that if that was the bone of contention, all things being equal, choose to not alienate a portion of the audience that would be turned off by that portrayal of Steve.
Not too mention, even in the male led Supehero films, what type of characterization and plot use do we prefer these days? I will take TAS-M's Gwen Stacy over the Raimi films' Mary Jane any day of the week. Give me Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle over Katie Holmes' Racheal. I mean even if you are being saved by the hero at least be a character with some meat on your bones and being presented well ala Adams or Kidder's Losis Lane, neither of which came off as incompetent or being there just to be eye candy.
Apply those same rules to Trevor, just admit up front that he's about out of his depth, as any normal, mortal man would be, when dealing with the powers and machinations of gods and monsters and other sernatural forces. That's fine. If Maclaren was thinking of presenting him like a male Dunst styled Mary Jane, then I get why that could be seen as a problem, while getting why she would see that as a natural gender flip move given the genre and the character. I just think that if that was the bone of contention, all things being equal, choose to not alienate a portion of the audience that would be turned off by that portrayal of Steve.