BvS Amy Adams IS Lois Lane

[N7 Joseph Shepard]

So you are saying you would rather this

THAN THESE?

Amy, it's called foundation, please use it

I'd rather her have that hair color as Lois (both pix from American Hustle), but make up wise, she looked fine, like many have said she was playing a reporter and in the middle of......well a war, when the hell is she going to apply make up while Metropolis is being destroyed and the world is experiencing crazy ass Earthquakes thanks to the Black Zero & World Engine lol

 

[ArmsHeldOut]

In MOS, Amy's Lois is portrayed as a more hands-on type of reporter. Rather than just write about a story, she often gets physically involved. So, it makes sense that she wouldn't look "glamorous" or whatever all the time.

That said, if the MOS sequel features more office takes with Lois, I'd honestly like to see Amy appear much in the same way she does during that one scene (in MOS) where she tries in vain to convince Perry that her initial hunch about Clark was baseless. Correspondingly, I see no reason why a female reporter can't look sexy within moderation and be professional at the same time -- that's an archaic mentality. Sure, the type of "70's-wear" Amy sports in American Hustle isn't appropriate for Lois, but if the filmmakers behind MOS 2 could borrow just a fraction of the sex appeal she exhibits in the former, I'd be a happy camper.

 

[STARMAN]

I just want Amy's Lois to be a substantial part of the next film no matter what she's wearing or what her makeup looks like.

 

[John Lambert]

I just want Amy's Lois to be a substantial part of the next film no matter what she's wearing or what her makeup looks like.

I care much more that Lois is at the center of the action, being key to exposing Luthor, than what she is wearing.

Some of my favorite episodes of "Lois and Clark" are where Lois subdues the bad guys before Superman shows up. Well, OK, I can only think of one episode where she fully does that. Although there was another two where Superman would have died except for Lois's intervention.

Hmm, in MOS, Superman would have died without Lois having been on the ship. She needs to be at least that important to MOS2. However, we should see more of her. In MOS we were almost half-way through when Lois showed up. OK, maybe not quite that far, but we should see more of Lois in MOS 2.

 

[WarriorDreamer]

So everyone else will still be dressed for the modern era... but Lois should be dressed like she's from the 1930's?

Uh...

No, I just meant vintage clothes which look classy and intelligent, rather than any old sweater she might find from the closet. I don't think she should wear 1930's outfits. Just outfits which compliment her rather than insult her.

She should just look feminine, sleek, classy and vintage, imo. The American Hustle outfit is dated and isn't classy. I think she can still look modern but keep the class of Hollywood 30's.

 

[John-An]

I care much more that Lois is at the center of the action, being key to exposing Luthor, than what she is wearing.

Some of my favorite episodes of "Lois and Clark" are where Lois subdues the bad guys before Superman shows up. Well, OK, I can only think of one episode where she fully does that. Although there was another two where Superman would have died except for Lois's intervention.

Hmm, in MOS, Superman would have died without Lois having been on the ship. She needs to be at least that important to MOS2. However, we should see more of her. In MOS we were almost half-way through when Lois showed up. OK, maybe not quite that far, but we should see more of Lois in MOS 2.

For me Lois had enough time for me. great develpment of the character not too heavy and important in the Superman´s scenes as a support character and his love interest... If she gets at least the time she has or a little more in WF I´ll be satisficed....

 

[AnneFan]

I just want Amy's Lois to be a substantial part of the next film no matter what she's wearing or what her makeup looks like.

I enjoyed the Bruce Wayne/Lois relationship in the World's Finest animated movie. Some of that would be fun here, Batman getting under Soup's skin even more.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

I enjoyed the Bruce Wayne/Lois relationship in the World's Finest animated movie. Some of that would be fun here, Batman getting under Soup's skin even more.

It wouldn't be fun if Bats didn't get under Supes skin.

 

[Herolee10]

I enjoyed the Bruce Wayne/Lois relationship in the World's Finest animated movie. Some of that would be fun here, Batman getting under Soup's skin even more.

Well, as long as there's no love triangle, that Bruce and Lois weren't former lovers, and that Lois isn't written like MJ was when she cheated on Peter for Harry, or with every other guy that she's been with in in Raimi's films, then yeah, it wouldn't be bad.

I just don't want the DCU to have it where Clark and Bruce shared the same lover or for this to turn into another twilight BS where they try to get everyone's attention by playing on who Lois will end up with.

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

It wouldn't be fun if Bats didn't get under Supes skin.

He can get under Superman's skin, fine. But do we have to have him... Well, cuckolding Superman? That, along with some other stuff in the Timmverse is what annoys a lot of Superman's fans. I don't need to see any of it in live action.

 

[N7 Joseph Shepard]

He can get under Superman's skin, fine. But do we have to have him... Well, cuckolding Superman? That, along with some other stuff in the Timmverse is what annoys a lot of Superman's fans. I don't need to see any of it in live action.

espetially in a "SUPERMAN" movie, people seem to forget that this is going to be a Superman movie that features Batman, not the other way around

 

[Herolee10]

He can get under Superman's skin, fine. But do we have to have him... Well, cuckolding Superman? That, along with some other stuff in the Timmverse is what annoys a lot of Superman's fans. I don't need to see any of it in live action.

espetially in a "SUPERMAN" movie, people seem to forget that this is going to be a Superman movie that features Batman, not the other way around

Agreed; plus, unlike the situation in the "World's Finest" film, Lois didn't know Superman's secret identity. In fact, it was due to superman not being emotionally available for her that paved the way for Bruce to sweep her off her feet.

However, based on what we've seen in "MOS" and what Goyer said about plans regarding the future of Clark and Lois, unless things change, Clark and Lois will be shown being in a "real relationship", with Lois protecting his secret.

Lois would look bad if she still ended up responding to Bruce's romantic advances, and people are still kind of feeling on the edge with how Superman is going to be portrayed next to Batman.

Plus, I don't think it'd be a good idea for them to establish that Bruce and Lois were former lovers as well. I may be old fashioned, but I never think it's a good idea to have two friends/partners share the same lover. It's just a mess.

That's why I was impressed with what I saw in MOS because for all the crap that Snyder and Goyer has gotten from fans regarding MOS, they at least portrayed both Clark and Lois in classy matters that befitted their characters with respect and dignity imho.

Which is kind of why I hope they're going with an older batman simply because it helps lower down the chances that they'll go down a lover's triangle route simply because an older batman is less likely to be put in that position than a younger one.

 

[MrMaooz]

Agreed; plus, unlike the situation in the "World's Finest" film, Lois didn't know Superman's secret identity. In fact, it was due to superman not being emotionally available for her that paved the way for Bruce to sweep her off her feet.

However, based on what we've seen in "MOS" and what Goyer said about plans regarding the future of Clark and Lois, unless things change, Clark and Lois will be shown being in a "real relationship", with Lois protecting his secret.

Lois would look bad if she still ended up responding to Bruce's romantic advances, and people are still kind of feeling on the edge with how Superman is going to be portrayed next to Batman.

Plus, I don't think it'd be a good idea for them to establish that Bruce and Lois were former lovers as well. I may be old fashioned, but I never think it's a good idea to have two friends/partners share the same lover. It's just a mess.

That's why I was impressed with what I saw in MOS because for all the crap that Snyder and Goyer has gotten from fans regarding MOS, they at least portrayed both Clark and Lois in classy matters that befitted their characters with respect and dignity imho.

Which is kind of why I hope they're going with an older batman simply because it helps lower down the chances that they'll go down a lover's triangle route simply because an older batman is less likely to be put in that position than a younger one.

Plus, there's this. I don't remember where I found this but...

I...(gasping for breath)..Im pretty sure it counts only if you (LOIS) are kising human." that means since LOIS is KISSING HIM AN ALIEN ,it wont go downhill heheee cos he will definitely be kissing her again, considering actually they are giving each other signs of falling in love with one another.They definitely will kiss again as in the last scene in MOS he goes to work in Daily Planet as a promise kept;-))

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

Plus... C'MON SON!! HE'S SUPER-MAN! Bruce may have the bank but in the sack we all know how this is gonna play out. (Cue Carley Simon's "NOBODY DOES IT BETTER")

 

[Herolee10]

Honestly, considering that we now have Batman to deal with in this new film, that really doesn't leave a lot of space now for the amount of time that other characters have.

If I had it my way, I'd have Lois's two big arcs in this film involving her playing a key role in taking down Lex with her journalistic skills and the further development of her relationship with Clark/Superman.

 

[N7 Joseph Shepard]

Honestly, considering that we now have Batman to deal with in this new film, that really doesn't leave a lot of space now for the amount of time that other characters have.

If I had it my way, I'd have Lois's two big arcs in this film involving her playing a key role in taking down Lex with her journalistic skills and the further development of her relationship with Clark/Superman.

all depends on if Lois is the only female lead in this, they have sorta established that Henry and whoever plays Bats will be the male leads of the film, Lois obviously will be the female lead on Supes' side, will we get Vickie Vale show up as Bats'? 2 strong female reporters working side by side lol

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

all depends on if Lois is the only female lead in this, they have sorta established that Henry and whoever plays Bats will be the male leads of the film, Lois obviously will be the female lead on Supes' side, will we get Vickie Vale show up as Bats'? 2 strong female reporters working side by side lol

Actually... That's not too shabby. I nominate you for a Scooby Snack! Vale is not a huge part of the mythos, but I do remember some story where she and Lois were presented as friends, or at least that she admired Vale as a fellow journalist. It would be one way to put a stamp on this version of Batman to give Vale a spotlight she has not had since the '89 film.

 

[Herolee10]

all depends on if Lois is the only female lead in this, they have sorta established that Henry and whoever plays Bats will be the male leads of the film, Lois obviously will be the female lead on Supes' side, will we get Vickie Vale show up as Bats'? 2 strong female reporters working side by side lol

I guess it really depends on what this film is going to be considered as; a MOS sequel with Batman, or a true adaptation of "World's Finest".

And even if it was the former, they could still go about it where the romantic angle of the film is taken cared of by Clark and Lois only while Superman and Batman handles the "Bromance" department.lol

I mean if anyone's watched "Public Enemies", that's a perfect example imho of how Batman could see Clark and Lois's relationship, where he just scoffs it off as something he doesn't understand because of how much of a loner and no nonsense person he is.lol

 

[N7 Joseph Shepard]

Actually... That's not too shabby. I nominate you for a Scooby Snack! Vale is not a huge part of the mythos, but I do remember some story where she and Lois were presented as friends, or at least that she admired Vale as a fellow journalist. It would be one way to put a stamp on this version of Batman to give Vale a spotlight she has not had since the '89 film.

Rank Rou Raggy hehehehehehehe.........

Vale had a much bigger role in the Batman mythos when he first showed up in the comics (1940s) and has since died down like crazy. And yeah last time we saw her in live action was the '89 Batman movie.....where did she go after that?

With Snyder and his love for old school characterization I'm willing to bet Vicki has a strong chance of making some kind of appearance, even if its not a lead female role.

I guess it really depends on what this film is going to be considered as; a MOS sequel with Batman, or a true adaptation of "World's Finest".

And even if it was the former, they could still go about it where the romantic angle of the film is taken cared of by Clark and Lois only while Superman and Batman handles the "Bromance" department.lol

I mean if anyone's watched "Public Enemies", that's a perfect example imho of how Batman could see Clark and Lois's relationship, where he just scoffs it off as something he doesn't understand because of how much of a loner and no nonsense person he is.lol

I'd hope they use a few of the best story elements from the best storylines to build this movie, Public Enemies is one, but I'd like for Amy/Lois to have a bigger role.

And when it comes to Frank Miller's Batman, if they want to use Frank's interpretation of Batman, then me personally, I'd go with his All-Star Batman version rather than his Dark Knight Returns one.

All-Star fits better cause it tells the story of an already established Batman meeting the world's heroes for the first time where as Returns is after the fact, he's met and known them for years......also All-Star helps my idea for Vicki lol and wouldn't it be funny if they teased Robin in it with a scene like this?

And if they introduce Jimmy finally.....

 

[NosfeRomas]

I really want to know what happens after that.

 

[N7 Joseph Shepard]

I really want to know what happens after that.

after what? The scene with Jimmy?

 

[Smallville13]

Not creepy at all, Miller.

 

[John Lambert]

espetially in a "SUPERMAN" movie, people seem to forget that this is going to be a Superman movie that features Batman, not the other way around

What if Lois goes on a date with Bruce, but it is really part of a plot she and Clark have worked out to try to figure out what Bruce is really up to, so Clark does not mind it, because he is in on the plot to begin with.

If we can move beyond Clark pulling the wool over Lois's eyes with a double identity, we can move beyond Batman elbowing into Superman's romantic territory.

 

[John Lambert]

Agreed; plus, unlike the situation in the "World's Finest" film, Lois didn't know Superman's secret identity. In fact, it was due to superman not being emotionally available for her that paved the way for Bruce to sweep her off her feet.

However, based on what we've seen in "MOS" and what Goyer said about plans regarding the future of Clark and Lois, unless things change, Clark and Lois will be shown being in a "real relationship", with Lois protecting his secret.

Lois would look bad if she still ended up responding to Bruce's romantic advances, and people are still kind of feeling on the edge with how Superman is going to be portrayed next to Batman.

Plus, I don't think it'd be a good idea for them to establish that Bruce and Lois were former lovers as well. I may be old fashioned, but I never think it's a good idea to have two friends/partners share the same lover. It's just a mess.

That's why I was impressed with what I saw in MOS because for all the crap that Snyder and Goyer has gotten from fans regarding MOS, they at least portrayed both Clark and Lois in classy matters that befitted their characters with respect and dignity imho.

Which is kind of why I hope they're going with an older batman simply because it helps lower down the chances that they'll go down a lover's triangle route simply because an older batman is less likely to be put in that position than a younger one.

Or they could go the route of a Batman who is s much younger than Clark and Lois as Jimmy normally is. Since I have seen "Easter Parade", I am not sure there is any possibility hat they could cast a Batman who was enough older he would not be a potential rival for Lois' affections (OK, to be fair, "Easter Parade" has to be understood as a case where we believe Fred Astaire's character is a lot young than Astaire was, but still).

 

[John Lambert]

Actually... That's not too shabby. I nominate you for a Scooby Snack! Vale is not a huge part of the mythos, but I do remember some story where she and Lois were presented as friends, or at least that she admired Vale as a fellow journalist. It would be one way to put a stamp on this version of Batman to give Vale a spotlight she has not had since the '89 film.

Vickie Vale is a Lois equivalent snuck into the Batman story. Except she was mainly the "Lois is this annoying person trying to expose Superman's secret identity" equivalent. She may make it to love interest, but she is not as crucial to the Batman story as Lois is to Superman stories. To list the dates, Superman/Clark and Lois first appear in 1938, Batman in 1939, and Vicki Vale in 1948.

Actually, for what it is worth, Lois is a character who was first developed before Batman. She is of the same age as Superman. Vickie Vale does not appear in the Batman stories into well into them. She is never as well positioned.

It might be more interesting if Vale is Lois's arch-enemy. She is intent on getting the Gotham Gazette the true story behind the alien.