sasquatchs
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Messages
- 4,710
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Rachel's role was useless but Andrea would be even worse, she'd be incidental to the rest of the film
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Bad idea. As said, the "problem" with the Rachel Dawes character lay in how her role was written, not in the name or the fact she wasn't a character from the comics (or BTAS)...
The second you introduce the female lead as "Andrea Beaumont", you HAVE to do the Phantasm story arc, which is what all fans would expect (and deserve). That option probably never even dawned to Nolan (why would it?), so there's no reason he should have named this character Andrea Beaumont.
Her story was told perfectly in MOTP, why retread that in a new film??