Sawyer
Definitely Not 40
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
- Messages
- 109,837
- Reaction score
- 20,606
- Points
- 203
Yes beard and yes moustache.No beard and no moustache, clean shaven.
Yes beard and yes moustache.No beard and no moustache, clean shaven.
You haven't?Every person being cast in this role on their own is a fine talent. But I've never seen a bigger set of actors being miscast for a film in my life.
Serkis may be great at playing bad guys but honestly I'm not surprised to hear about his more sensitive side. He has often brought a lot of humanity to his villains. Gollum was first and foremost a tragic figure and even his Klaw had a certain charm that wouldn't have been there with a lesser actor. Serkis as Alfred never occurred to me but I can totally see it working.To be honest I think Serkis Alfred will be much softer than what people are assuming he'll be.
If you look at his interviews, whenever Matt talks about Serkis he talks about how kind and compassionate and sensitive he is, I think he's even mentioned how they spent hours and hours talking about profound things until they both started crying, and he also mentions how it's those characteristics of Andy that he loved to see eventually translated into Caesar.
Another thing to consider is that: There's nothing more important to Matt Reeves in a story than emotion. He constantly talks about that in interviews as well, he also talks about how he likes to find ways to personally connect to themes or relationships or whatever in his movies, so having those two things in mind there's no way in hell he won't have some extremely emotionally charged surrogate father-son moments in this movie. Even if he appears in 3 scenes, they'll count. Alfred after all is the only person that REALLY knows Bruce to his fullest extent; he's his emotional cornerstone, he was there when his parents were alive, he was there when they were killed, and he's still with him after all that time. Seeing the way Reeves typically approaches things in his movies, I very much doubt he won't make use of that huge part of the Batman canon.
I wouldn't at all be surprised if Matt cast Serkis as Alfred precisely because he wants people to see that softer side of him people don't usually associate him with instead of just casting him as a degenerate rogue.
I don't. I wish he stayed a CGI creature in some other film.Fan art from Twitter. Tell me you don't see Alfred there.
Jesus Christ, did he murder your cat or something? What's with the disdain?I don't. I wish he stayed a CGI creature in some other film.
Jesus Christ, did he murder your cat or something? What's with the disdain?
I'm honestly surprised that some people dont think Serkis is right for alfred.
I think that if there's any director that'd know that Andy is more than aggresiveness and flamboyance and wou, it's Reeves, I really could see him just doing a complete 180 on the way people normally see him. And I don't see how people familiar with his work would be bothered; were they bothered when he played Tesla's assistant?I don't see Serkis being given a role in a big tentpole film where he doesn't get to show a certain amount of aggressiveness or flamboyance. I think him playing a soft-spoken, low-key Alfred would leave people familiar with his roles a little expectant, even if I'm sure he'd pull it off.
Isn't that pretty much every Alfted except Michael Gough and Alan Napier?That's just it, that type of Alfred's been done, and you don't often get an actor known for eclectic role choices to do something that's been seen before and fairly recently. I think he'll at least be a much more "tough love", wryly humorous type of Alfred, with good nuance. Just a theory.