As a guy which fantasy do you want more ?

As a guy which fantasy do you want more ?

  • Be a playa having meaningless sex with women you barely know including threesomes etc

  • Finding a special woman to share your life with whom you love and would marry(if you believe in it)


Results are only viewable after voting.
After seeing Casino Royale, who didn't want the same relationship that Bond had with Vesper.

I know I did.
 
hunter rider said:
Thanks:up: i certainly agree that there is no set path or definates but i think the idea of never having anything meaningful and special with any woman with all relationships being of the casual kind is kind of a hollow target for life,at least IMO

Yer gonna be alright, kid. *tosses hunter rider his sweaty game jersey*

jag
 
I go with the first one. Us humans don't live long enough to love someone imo. Well...we do, I just don't want to outlive my loved one. And I want to live a long time...so yeah.
 
i can't be tied down... and I won't be.... it's not for me and it probably never will.

I like going out and hooking up with whoever I can.
 
I'd like to have a threesome with 2 Swedish supermodels.

But only if I could pay them.
 
Erzengel said:
I'd like to have a threesome with 2 Swedish supermodels.

But only if I could pay them.

And one day, when your balls are all old and wrinkly, those Swedish supermodels will STILL be having threesomes with you.

Because you pay them:ninja:
 
I chose the second one. Even if the person doesn't love me back and is out of my life, I'll remember her and whatnot. Without that I'd have nothing to make me want to wake up in the morning. I'd forever drift in and out of sleep, only getting out of bed to wander off to the bathroom half awake and things like that.

.......:dry:
 
well first, i don't really consider these to be fantasies.

i believe there is a time and place for each.

without variations of the first, you can't truelly appreciate the second


and if you haven't dabbled in the second, then you aren't going to get far or appreciate the joys of the first.


although i wouldn't like to have either, meaningless adventures mixed in with some long term relationships i think would suit me best. I don't feel i will have any life long commitments though, i'm too much of a lone wolf.
 
My two cents.....

Having done my share of the first, through HS and College. Then after college having this attitude/past cause nothing but problems with girlfriends. Which sucked, but I learned I lot about myself and relationships. Then I met my wife, who I love and adore, and couldn't think of a better way to spend the rest of my life.

What did I learn? Experience life and what it has to offer, but be respectful,
and then find someone to share your life with. Everything you do, when done for or with someone else, will be so much more meaningful and worthwhile.
 
Hugh Hefner has been in love and gotten married and he's had the "meaningless threesomes". Guess which one he prefers today?
 
You're no Hugh Hefner. Not by a long shot.
 
blind_fury said:
Hugh Hefner has been in love and gotten married and he's had the "meaningless threesomes". Guess which one he prefers today?

Window dressing for the sake of image?
 
Who wants to wake up next to the same chick every morning when you can have a different set of these every weekend? :woot:

danajigglesir2pk0.gif

naomi.gif
 
Darthphere said:
That you have to pay top dollar for right?

Which is really easy for him to do since he's an unemployed student. :up:

jag
 
Hopefully I get to the the first option while trying to find the special someone.
 
blind_fury said:
I don't need to be Hugh Hefner to have threesomes with beautiful women. :whatever:


Yeah you need money, which you also dont have. :up:
 
blind_fury said:
sorry kids, love doesn't last forever.

http://www.physorg.com/news8568.html

Hahaha! Whatever. My wife and I must be an anomoly in their study, then. Science has never been able to come to any sort of conclusive conclusion about love and how it works. It's FAR more than just a chemical reaction and trying to boil it down as such is scientifically naive. Nice try, kid.

jag
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"