Just by reading you can tell they're only assuming all of this. It's not confirmed and they don't know. It's all up to Reeves.
Matt Reeves rebooting Batman for a new standalone franchise, likely with a new actor to play the Caped Crusader after Ben Afflecks stints in Batman V Superman and Justice League
So who are we going to believe, some random fake Twitter scooper who has lied/been proven false multiple times in the past or an actual Hollywood trade?Daniel R heard last week again Ben's staying, and today says
Mark Hughes thinks he's finished
original deadline quote
Precisely. I don't know how people can overlook this. When people on this forum say "Affleck had the best performance as Batman," I always question, "What performance?"As much as I like Batfleck, he had plenty of help which didn't have anything to do with his presence. The voice was modulated to hell, the suit was off a mold of a huge bodybuilder, the fight scenes were entirely done by a stuntman.
The confrontation with Supes is really the only time he got to show off under the cowl, which was admittedly very good imo. But it's still tough to consider those above points in the overall movie.
Ryan Gosling
Jake Gyllenhaal
Jon Hamm
Michael Fassbender
Idris Elba
Richard Armitage
Colin Farrell
Karl Urban
I'd be fine with any of these guys
The big question mark going forward is the future of Batman. Writer-director Matt Reeves turned in the first act of a new screenplay during the Memorial Day weekend. It's said to focus on a young caped crusader, and while the studio would not comment, it's unlikely that Ben Affleck, who has played Batman in three features, will again don the cowl.
Same. I don't mind them going younger again, but I'm not interested in seeing the origin revisited. Set the film 3-5 years into his career.I just hope we dont get another rookie/YO storyline.