is it necessary to buy all 20 issues to understand the story like the resurrection of ra's? thats a lot of money lol, if i just bought the batman one would i be ok? i already get detective anyway
I dont think anyone on this planet is crazy enough to completely rape Batmans origin like that, its such a beautiful, operatic origin.
If by some small chance, all this is true, it would make One More Day look like a pulitzer winner.
you don;t need the Ra's arc but pretty much every other issue ties in somehow
Honestly when was the last time you read a Batman comic and felt such a sense of impending dread?
"I'm in the same boat as you.That's the problem, though.
Half of the fans are reading this and thinking, "Man! This is good stuff. Really exciting twists and turns. Can't wait to see how this affects Bruce in the long run."
The other half are reading this and thinking, "...Oh man, please don't tell me he's really going to do that to the Batman mythos."
And while I hate to admit it, I'm in the latter category right now.

^it's already on tpb, it was kind of boring, too many crossovers IMO... Dini's epilogue at the end was awesome though
The issue is Detective Comics #840.
and the fact that that isn't reprinted in the collected edition is what kept me from buying it. The story was alright, but not worth buying the hardcover, and the lack of including that issue gave me more of a reason not to buy it.
anyways, this R.I.P. thing is interesting. But i have to ask: has anyone read that one elseworld title called Detective #27 by Michael Uslan? Basically, the idea is thatThe book takes place in 1939, but Thomas Wayne isn't dead. He's part of some insidious organization that dates back to the civil war, hellbent on taking over the world. He killed Martha because she was getting more and more suspicious of Thomas, and Thomas faked his own death. The murderers(taking liberties from Burton's film) were hired hitmen, part of the same organization Thomas Wayne is part of.Also, Alfred is revealed as a spy for another organization whose purpose is to defeat the organization Thomas is a part of.
After reading the newest issue, i was really kind of disapointed that Morrison kind of borrowed that angle. I thought the concepts were too similar. Add that to the fact that Morrison wants to turn Bruce into a bum, like Miller did Daredevil in "Born Again" and this whole thing seems a bit lackluster.
That's the problem, though.
Half of the fans are reading this and thinking, "Man! This is good stuff. Really exciting twists and turns. Can't wait to see how this affects Bruce in the long run."
The other half are reading this and thinking, "...Oh man, please don't tell me he's really going to do that to the Batman mythos."
And while I hate to admit it, I'm in the latter category right now.
Or perhaps the "truth" about Thomas and Martha Wayne is just an elaborate fabrication created by "Black Glove" as part of his effort to destroy Batman, and that Morrison is making reference to [blackout]Detective #27[/blackout]to be used as the "story" behind the fabrication. After all, Morrison has been making references to all sorts of Batman continuity in his run, why not that?
Also, here's an idea to float out there: since Morrison seems to like to make references to the Silver Age, does anyone remember who Bruce Wayne original guardian was before it was retconned into being Alfred? It was Thomas Wayne's brother, Philip, who, if I remember correctly, no longer existed after COIE. Well, what if that's not the case? What if the "Black Glove" or the guy in charge of the Club of Villains not only was responsible for the death of Thomas and Martha Wayne, but that the murderer was Philip Wayne, Thomas's own brother (and perhaps identical twin?) Why? Because Thomas "stole" Martha, the woman he loved away from him. Alfred knew about this but decided to keep the knowledge from Bruce, believing that it would destroy Bruce knowing that the man who killed his father was also his only living relative. Too much of a stretch?
its not ENOUGH of a stretch. Instead of brothers, they're the same person but from different universes, Bruce is a clone of Philip, and this whole time Alfred was a robot programmed by the Grant Morrison who appears in his own comic?

Or perhaps the "truth" about Thomas and Martha Wayne is just an elaborate fabrication created by "Black Glove" as part of his effort to destroy Batman, and that Morrison is making reference to [blackout]Detective #27[/blackout]to be used as the "story" behind the fabrication. After all, Morrison has been making references to all sorts of Batman continuity in his run, why not that?
Also, here's an idea to float out there: since Morrison seems to like to make references to the Silver Age, does anyone remember who Bruce Wayne original guardian was before it was retconned into being Alfred? It was Thomas Wayne's brother, Philip, who, if I remember correctly, no longer existed after COIE. Well, what if that's not the case? What if the "Black Glove" or the guy in charge of the Club of Villains not only was responsible for the death of Thomas and Martha Wayne, but that the murderer was Philip Wayne, Thomas's own brother (and perhaps identical twin?) Why? Because Thomas "stole" Martha, the woman he loved away from him. Alfred knew about this but decided to keep the knowledge from Bruce, believing that it would destroy Bruce knowing that the man who killed his father was also his only living relative. Too much of a stretch?
. But I wonder if there's a point to so many displays since we've never seen it like that before - exepct for the future 666 issue, which was the first time there was four cases.Umm, bingo!Guys, I think we're all doing to ourselves here the same thing we did with Hush. Missing the answer that's right in front of our faces. The Black Glove is obviously Tommy Elliot![]()
Batman #677, came out today.
![]()
![]()