Baywatch: The movie! - Part 1

[scarlet-witch]

I knew this wasn't going to be loved, but damn 8%?

 

[Snow Queen]

If you watched Stuckmann review, it seems graphic nudity reasons were because of males. Penis, guys. Again hollywood bull*** ing us with fake propagandas and agendas.

Not my baywatch. If it bombs, let it bomb HARD at least. And that's my penis joke.

...Curiosity gets the better of me, I'll bite, what exactly is the propaganda and agenda of male nudity?

 

[MadVillainy]

Neno you always seem so angry...

 

[smallville fan]

My reaction to the RT score and bad reviews:

[YT]OX5Fcd8syp8[/YT]

Seriously, though, the movie looked awful regardless. Baywatch isn't a raunchy comedy!

Given the sex appeal and the abnormally good looking people is what made the show succeed, one could get a great R-Rated Comedy by taking the Jump Street route correctly out of it. And that seemed like and it still seems like that is the only way to go about it if you wanted to reboot Baywatch. Jump Street was remembered as a buddy cop high school show and they played it up as a comedy. If they went with a more down to earth plot that played up the sex appeal of the entire cast instead of ripping the plot of Jump Street, then we could have a better movie I guess?

If the graphic nudity in the rating involved any of the females, which we all know it won't, I'd be more inclined to watch.

Yeah, it seemed like from Stuckmann's review that they got 4 of the hottest women on the planet (given the buzzword he said) and didn't do that much with them otherwise they'd be ticking off women's rights activists.

In my Baywatch movie, I'd make it something a teenage boy would watch.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

...Curiosity gets the better of me, I'll bite, what exactly is the propaganda and agenda of male nudity?

I too am very curious about this as well.

 

[MadVillainy]

d***s are scary man

 

[Drizzle]

It's funny how if it's boobs or butts, it's just "nudity", but a penis constitutes "graphic nudity". They're just that bold and offensive.

 

[terry78]

They're always pointing and fingering people.


........

 

[Drizzle]

They're always pointing and fingering people.


........

 

[chaseter]

I remember watching Baywatch as a kid and thinking that it could use a lot more dong.

 

[DACrowe]

I remember watching Baywatch as a kid and thinking that it could use a lot more dong.

Well your wish has been granted!

Anyway, I doubt this is a good movie, but male nudity I am sure is the least of its problems. And it is funny how if it had gratuitous nudity from any of its female stars, the same people turning themselves in knots would probably be nodding along like Quagmire.

 

[Dark Raven]

After this and CHiPs, where they have both been received negatively and not considered very funny at all, why keep trying this kind of humour in future?

 

[smallville fan]

After this and CHiPs, where they have both been received negatively and not considered very funny at all, why keep trying this kind of humour in future?

Because those 80's/90's shows are looked at as so bad it's good by present day folk and it should be laughed at hence why they made it a comedy?

 

[smallville fan]

Aww no, the Schmoes gave it a bad review while Grace Randolph seems to soften it up a bit.

[YT]ay3LxzcU6LU[/YT]

[YT]xg0dgSHZhv8[/YT]

 

[Bats123]

Yeah i didnt feel it was terrible but there's points in the movie where there's ZERO laughs and they take it too seriously, althought i quite enjoyed Dwayne, Efron and Daddario, and yes, its true.

Spoiler

There's penises, no female nudity IIRC, weird huh

 

[harlequinade]

If you watched Stuckmann review, it seems graphic nudity reasons were because of males. Penis, guys. Again hollywood bull*** ing us with fake propagandas and agendas.

Not my baywatch. If it bombs, let it bomb HARD at least. And that's my penis joke.

It's more common to see a space ship than a d*** in movies these days so I don't know where is that propaganda

 

[MadVillainy]

I dont know why people expected female nudity in this.
I didn't expect d***s either but still.

 

[I Am The Knight]

I dont know why people expected female nudity in this.
I didn't expect d***s either but still.

I don't think anyone expected d***s but here we are.

 

[Dark Raven]

Because those 80's/90's shows are looked at as so bad it's good by present day folk and it should be laughed at hence why they made it a comedy?

Not saying it can't be a comedy, but why do they have to make it a crude and raunchy comedy which doesn't seem to go down well with audiences?

 

[psylockolussus]

I knew this was gonna suck. The trailers are awful and unfunny.

 

[jfurioso]

Not saying it can't be a comedy, but why do they have to make it a crude and raunchy comedy which doesn't seem to go down well with audiences?

Well, I think all those Farrelly/Apatow?etc comedies with scatological humor have kinda become the norm. Bridesmaids, Neighbors, BadMoms, etc. Many of this new breed of comedies actually show plots that could have been much milder in terms of sex and language, but the raunchiness is considered a selling point, I guess.

 

[-JKR-]

After this and CHiPs, where they have both been received negatively and not considered very funny at all, why keep trying this kind of humour in future?

The studios looked at the Jump Street movies and thought "hmm, this works." But it worked for a reason. Those movies are great, and Lord and Miller are incredibly talented filmmakers.

 

[2kt09]

Well, I think all those Farrelly/Apatow?etc comedies with scatological humor have kinda become the norm. Bridesmaids, Neighbors, Bad Moms, etc. Many of this new breed of comedies actually show plots that could have been much milder in terms of sex and language, but the raunchiness is considered a selling point, I guess.

Really just now realized there are only two kinds of Hollywood comedies.
That and animated.

 

[culver3vlr22]

It's funny how if it's boobs or butts, it's just "nudity", but a penis constitutes "graphic nudity". They're just that bold and offensive.

Well for the most part both men and women have nipples and butts.

I'd bet a shot of a vag, not just the woman's bush, it'd probably be "graphic" but I could be wrong.

 

[terry78]

You don't get that outside of indie movies.