- Joined
- Apr 24, 2009
- Messages
- 18,355
- Reaction score
- 1,741
- Points
- 103
Not really, no.
They spent very little time on the harming animals bit. The land deal could have easily been opposed by Ivy who could have feared for the plant life. The motivations were glossed over to a degree. You can't really judge if this was a worthwhile change or not at this point.
Last edited: