X-Maniac
Storm In A Teacup
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 15,210
- Reaction score
- 631
- Points
- 103
I didn't even notice Hugh's name was above the title in the trailer until someone pointed it out. And my only reaction to it was bracing for inevitable griping that was sure to follow about it.
Again, I love this cast and it doesn't matter to me who goes where. DOFP has come up in conversation a few times with some friends and co-workers over the past, and not one of them asked about the billing. Really, no one cares.
But, still, that billing with Jackman in HUGE letters was a sign that Fox cannot let go of the actor or character. That overdependency is not good for the series, and ultimately it won't do them any good when they have to make films without Jackman.
I have no problem with Jackman, or with Wolverine, but I do think there is an over-reliance on the actor/character.
We still don't know why Storm is in the X-Men. We still don't really know why Nightcrawler ISN'T in the X-Men. We're all still wondering when Gambit WILL BE in the X-Men. We're all still waiting for Rogue to stop being a total drip and get on with being in the X-Men.
As for new characters - Blink, Sunspot, Bishop and Warpath are probably just cannon fodder in the future dystopia and Quicksilver doesn't exist in the future so he will simply come and go in a flash in the past.
It would be nice if the franchise had a little more stability other than the endless dominance by Wolverine.
I didn't watch the cartoons, or read the comics, just to see Wolverine strutting about being all mean and butch.
And no one was THAT bothered about the past of Mystique since she is usually known for her... well... mystique. It's interesting to see her fleshed out though there seems a violent jump from First Class insecure girl to Future Past acrobatic badass. We must presume she spent the ten year gap at a top gymnastic school.



