- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,222
- Points
- 103
I applaud your honesty but I couldn't disagree more on everything you said, as I see BR as Ford at his minimalistic best - whereas Gosling was straight out dull. Even Robin Wright didn't shine in that film. The only performances that really stood out were Hoek and DeArmas.
Hoek really stood out and there was some real cleverness in the character's design Probably the most disturbing scene in the film was where Wallace purposely murders Luv's newborn clone in front of her - probably to intentionally drive her insane enough to enjoy murdering people. It does a lot to establish her character - but she still doesn't hold a candle to Roy Batty.
However, I respect your opinion. We must agree to disagree. I will say though that it remains to be seen whether 2049 will have anywhere near the legacy or influence of BR - which, IMHO is one of the, if not the greatest sci-fi films of all time.
I respectfully disagree too, but I will just say that I understand your love for the original, try to judge the sequel on it's own terms instead of comparing it. I'm not saying it'll change your mind on it, but when you do compare it to something you love so much, inevitably, it will always fall short and it will have an unfair disadvantage.
The sequel has already been praised, so it's not a thing like the original where its reputation will grow over time, but I truly think the sequel will stand the test of time and be known as the one revival that surpassed expectations in this era of revivals in a film historical context, but in general, just a timeless film in it's own right. And one of the best sequels ever made.