I wonder if virtual reality ever gets good enough or if we ever find a way to upload and store memories if we could make murderers experience the last moments of their victim's life. The pain, the fear, the agony. I'm sure that would be to close to torture for some people to even consider, but it would be a fitting punishment in some cases. Make this guy feel what some of those people felt when burning hot shrapnel tore their limbs off. Make him feel how they felt when they were lying there bleeding to death. The confusion. The bargaining. The pleading. Really put the murderer in the shoes of the victim and see if that doesn't make them understand the gravity of their actions.
What's the point, though? The murderer wouldn't be released into society so the only motivation would be revenge of some sorts, and I don't know if we should go down that road.
A lot of sadistic sickos in this thread.
Reminds me of the White Bear episode from Black Mirror.
So if you kill someone what should the comeuppance be...you just feel really bad about it afterwards? I'm pretty liberal but even I am cynical about that type of thing.
America feeds off of blind hatred, revenge and brutal gory murders. Humanity in general feeds off of that. I don't mean to exclude myself from these barbaric feelings because I have them and I've voiced them here. My inner darkness has been laid bare many times.A lot of sadistic sickos in this thread.
A public execution at Fenway Park seems more appropriate.
They killed the DC Sniper after 4 months.
I think this will be a pretty speedy process too.
I heard he goes to Terra Haute, Indiana.
No they didn't. He was found guilty and sentenced to the death penalty in Virginia, but the he had to be tried in Maryland (which didn't have the death penalty) a few years later. The biggest reason why Muhammad was executed quick that most simply comes from him giving up on the appeals process and saw it as a lost cause.
Tsarnaev on the other hand is going to appeal. The only thing that could speed up the process in this case simply comes from the defense having very little to work with and Tsarnaev's demeanor makes him very unlikeable and unsympathetic to judges.
Anything less than the death penalty would be an insult. Why? Because he kills & majorly injures people, some of the same people who would be paying taxes on keeping him fed & clothed in prison.
All criminals of this nature should be put to death so here, for once, I am completely happy with the outcome. Now let's get it done so we can move on from talking about this deficiente.
Back when all the botched execution fiasco hit the media John Olliver discussed it and showed the costs of giving someone life in prison versus giving them the death penalty and execution is actually more expensive than holding someone for life. What makes the death penalty so expensive is that the government is required to pay for any appeals that a criminal that is given the death sentance makes. And a death row criminal gets more than one appeal. The government has to pay their court costs, their lawyer fees, transportation fees back and forth to court, and anything that goes along with that and those fees far outstrip the cost of just holding the person for life, because someone given a life sentence is required to pay for their own appeals, lawyers, court costs, and expenses etc.