DA_Champion
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 12,106
- Reaction score
- 930
- Points
- 73
Another factor is that we don't know if the 200 million cost of ASM2 is genuine.
Here are the hidden variables:
- Production cost of the movie, what you see on Wikipedia might be science fiction ;
- Marketing costs ;
- A lot of executives getting paid a percentage gross, for example Jon Peters getting 15 million for Man of Steel, I bet other people are getting paid all the time ;
- Product placement brings in some revenue ;
- DVD sales, blu ray sales, rentals. The only info you can find online is US-based DVD+Blu Ray sales ;
- Licensing fees to television stations that play the movie ;
And even after that, if a movie breaks a minor profit, then that's losing money, because the theatre chain had an option of doing something else with that money. If the money comes from a loan then there's interest. If you take a finance course in university you'll learn that the cost of money is ~5% per annum.
Here are the hidden variables:
- Production cost of the movie, what you see on Wikipedia might be science fiction ;
- Marketing costs ;
- A lot of executives getting paid a percentage gross, for example Jon Peters getting 15 million for Man of Steel, I bet other people are getting paid all the time ;
- Product placement brings in some revenue ;
- DVD sales, blu ray sales, rentals. The only info you can find online is US-based DVD+Blu Ray sales ;
- Licensing fees to television stations that play the movie ;
And even after that, if a movie breaks a minor profit, then that's losing money, because the theatre chain had an option of doing something else with that money. If the money comes from a loan then there's interest. If you take a finance course in university you'll learn that the cost of money is ~5% per annum.
Also being a blockbuster has nothing to do with being in the slightest bit good. In fact many refer to the evolution of the blockbuster as the death of cinema.