Daredevil Daredevil General Discussion Thread - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know the obvious difference between TV and movie and AoS looks like TV, sometimes not good TV either. DD was in New York so I don't see how it's sets good look worse, and in the inside locations are supposed to look cheap thats the whole plot of the show.

What do you mean by rivalling Gotham? You mean in quality?

overall quality. Gotham has good writing and character development-- objectively speaking. i wouldnt even be citing it as an example if it wasnt the same playing field.

maybe a better comparison in terms of filmic quality is Persons of Interest? i believe that series is shot in NY as well. not gonna discuss its storytelling quality because thats just gonna devolve into a discussion im not interested in pursuing at this time.

anyway yes, bigger budget usually means filmic quality goes up too. i know right now DD is very gritty and edgy and "tight" shots, which helps immensely in the tone of the story. but im sure that TeamDaredevil would love to have their expanded shots, fight sequences, settings, cast etc etc, which comes with bigger budget. this is standard stuff for Gotham, AoS and half a dozen other popular action tv series (POI, 24). again thats network money. from what i can tell, DD is breaking new ground in delivering quality content without having to rely on the dictates of network executives. so yes, the success of DD is more than just from a comicbook fan perspective. its a potential game changer for tv industry as a whole.
 
The one thing I would like to see is Daredevil operating during the day, rather than only at night - especially now we've seen that great costume.
 
Just finished it. Fantastic. Goddard & DeKnight nailed it. Cox is a terrific Matt but its D'Onofrio who steals the show as a brilliant Kingpin. Also, the red suit looks alot better on screen.

Anyone have any guesses on who Stick is working for?

I think its
Master Khan
 
overall quality. Gotham has good writing and character development-- objectively speaking. i wouldnt even be citing it as an example if it wasnt the same playing field.

maybe a better comparison in terms of filmic quality is Persons of Interest? i believe that series is shot in NY as well. not gonna discuss its storytelling quality because thats just gonna devolve into a discussion im not interested in pursuing at this time.

anyway yes, bigger budget usually means filmic quality goes up too. i know right now DD is very gritty and edgy and "tight" shots, which helps immensely in the tone of the story. but im sure that TeamDaredevil would love to have their expanded shots, fight sequences, settings, cast etc etc, which comes with bigger budget. this is standard stuff for Gotham, AoS and half a dozen other popular action tv series (POI, 24). again thats network money. from what i can tell, DD is breaking new ground in delivering quality content without having to rely on the dictates of network executives. so yes, the success of DD is more than just from a comicbook fan perspective. its a potential game changer for tv industry as a whole.

Well swings and roundabouts I think Gotham is garbage and DD is the best comic book adaption, including films.

All those things you listed seem inconsequential, bigger sets, more sets, more characters, bigger fight sequences do not equal quality.

Not to mention none of them are needed. More settings? When the whole thing is about one neighborhood. More characters? When the all the characters they had were quality and interesting. Bigger/more fight sequences? When it's just one guy with his fists.

Daredevils (well for me anyway) budget fit it's premise and aim, I can't say the same for any of the other CBTVs.
 
Well swings and roundabouts I think Gotham is garbage and DD is the best comic book adaption, including films.

All those things you listed seem inconsequential, bigger sets, more sets, more characters, bigger fight sequences do not equal quality.

Not to mention none of them are needed. More settings? When the whole thing is about one neighborhood. More characters? When the all the characters they had were quality and interesting. Bigger/more fight sequences? When it's just one guy with his fists.

Daredevils (well for me anyway) budget fit it's premise and aim, I can't say the same for any of the other CBTVs.

ok buddy. i just feel im gonna need your quote someday :funny:
 
And I'll need your quote that maybe with a bigger budget Daredevil 'might' rival Gotham. :loco:

funny, i read your posts in other places mate, thought you'd be the saner sort than the usual... sort that posts around here?

oh wells guess not? :mnm:
 
funny, i read your posts in other places mate, thought you'd be the saner sort than the usual... sort that posts around here?

oh wells guess not? :mnm:

Well we all have opinions on what we like. I really don't like Gotham, simple. So clearly I find it baffling when someone even compares the shows let alone says it might rival it in the future.

You obviously must really like Gotham.

We're not all going to agree on everything :shrug:

But moving on from that and discussing the larger budget which I'm sure season 2 would have, what we you like to see it used on then?
 
Well we all have opinions on what we like. I really don't like Gotham, simple. So clearly I find it baffling when someone even compares the shows let alone says it might rival it in the future.

You obviously must really like Gotham.

We're not all going to agree on everything :shrug:

But moving on from that and discussing the larger budget which I'm sure season 2 would have, what we you like to see it used on then?

i like Gotham. but i like being objective even more so. i like it when people recognize a certain quality of work for what it really is rather than trump one to ridiculous levels, most specially in the expense of the others.

and i've mentioned it already mate. the same ones you made me sound like a :loco: :funny:
 
I have 3 more episodes left, but holy crap is this show awesome.
 
i like Gotham. but i like being objective even more so. i like it when people recognize a certain quality of work for what it really is rather than trump one to ridiculous levels, most specially in the expense of the others.

and i've mentioned it already mate. the same ones you made me sound like a :loco: :funny:

You can't be objective about art it's the most subjective thing. If I think Daredevil is the best comic book adaption and Gotham isn't good then that's what I think. And you think I'm wrong. Which is your opinion.

You can tell me to look at objectively but how exactly would that work? What would i look at for it to be objective?
 
I just finished episode 4. Damn, this is getting tense and relentless. Kingpin stole the show. Might be the best Marvel villain yet (even better than Magneto).

Ep.1: 7.5/10
Ep.2: 8.5/10
Ep.3: 9/10
Ep.4: 9.5/10
 
That Kingpin scene towards the end of episode 4.:eek: Just goes to show what women do to men.:o digging this show so far.
 
Am I the only one who got teary-eyed at the end, like a "that's my boy/he did it" moment? Lol seriously, huge smile on my face but felt like crying. It was over.
 
Am I the only one who got teary-eyed at the end, like a "that's my boy/he did it" moment? Lol seriously, huge smile on my face but felt like crying. It was over.

Not that this is a spoiler I think it's best comments like these are in the season 1 thread. Cos a lot of people coming in here are still going through the season.
 
If I'm not mistaken each episode had about $3 million for budget so it's not exactly chump change. Not sure how that compares to Network TV but considering they really have no need for CG effects I think they made good use of it. I enjoy Gotham but DD is leagues above that show in every major way. From writing, acting and visual appeal Gotham can't hold a candle to DD IMO.
 
Not that this is a spoiler I think it's best comments like these are in the season 1 thread. Cos a lot of people coming in here are still going through the season.

Yeah, course. Just sad I've completed the season already.
 
If I'm not mistaken each episode had about $3 million for budget so it's not exactly chump change. Not sure how that compares to Network TV but considering they really have no need for CG effects I think they made good use of it. I enjoy Gotham but DD is leagues above that show in every major way. From writing, acting and visual appeal Gotham can't hold a candle to DD IMO.

I believe Game of Thrones has 6 million per episode, so 3 million is really good. Of course a lot of that would go towards just filming in New York since it's one of the most expensive places to film.
 
If I'm not mistaken each episode had about $3 million for budget so it's not exactly chump change. Not sure how that compares to Network TV but considering they really have no need for CG effects I think they made good use of it. I enjoy Gotham but DD is leagues above that show in every major way. From writing, acting and visual appeal Gotham can't hold a candle to DD IMO.

None of the superhero shows on TV can. And I know it's not fair to compare, because they don't have the budget, the rating and a completely different target audience. But I wish the other shows would at least try to be similar. Keep it at 13 Episodes instead of 20+. Trim all the unnecessary fat. No useless filler, no endless will they, won't they relationship drama. Just focus on telling a good story as best you can.
 
Regarding the Daredevil/Gotham comparisons...

If this show had the same (terrible) writers that Gotham has, then that scene where the mob guys tell Matt's father to take a dive in the fight with Creel would have gone like this:

Mobster: Hey, Jack. How's your son?

Jack: That little devil is a pain in my ass! Haha just kidding. He's such a good, brave kid. He's going to grow up to be a man without fear!

Mobster: Good to hear. Anyway, we need you to go down in the fifth, Jack. But don't make it look too obvious. It should be okay, after all, Creel can ABSORB a lot of hits.
 
Regarding the Daredevil/Gotham comparisons...

If this show had the same (terrible) writers that Gotham has, then that scene where the mob guys tell Matt's father to take a dive in the fight with Creel would have gone like this:

Mobster: Hey, Jack. How's your son?

Jack: That little devil is a pain in my ass! Haha just kidding. He's such a good, brave kid. He's going to grow up to be a man without fear!

Mobster: Good to hear. Anyway, we need you to go down in the fifth, Jack. But don't make it look too obvious. It should be okay, after all, Creel can ABSORB a lot of hits.

:funny:

Wilson Fisk would have been at the bowling lane in episode 3.

Mobster: Look at that strike, he really is the KING of the PINS.
 
Inconsequential Nitpick Alert: It really bugs me that the episode synopsis all call him Murdock instead of Matt. Nobody calls him Murdock. What's up with that?
 
I'm meaning to catch Gotham but you guys are putting me off it haha.
 
Regarding the Daredevil/Gotham comparisons...

If this show had the same (terrible) writers that Gotham has, then that scene where the mob guys tell Matt's father to take a dive in the fight with Creel would have gone like this:

Mobster: Hey, Jack. How's your son?

Jack: That little devil is a pain in my ass! Haha just kidding. He's such a good, brave kid. He's going to grow up to be a man without fear!

Mobster: Good to hear. Anyway, we need you to go down in the fifth, Jack. But don't make it look too obvious. It should be okay, after all, Creel can ABSORB a lot of hits.

:funny:

Wilson Fisk would have been at the bowling lane in episode 3.

Mobster: Look at that strike, he really is the KING of the PINS.

Sad, but true.
 
Also Gotham is pretty dire imo. THIS is how I would do a Batman show. Just swap the lawyer stuff for detective stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"