Hey guys, someone on another X-men board said that Louise simonson said in the Total film article that she think apocalypse will be bad.
Anyone have a scan or link to that part of the article?
Thanks
Yeah I don't get that, especially when Singer calls Apocalypse another "inbetweenquel". In between what exactly?
Just reminder angel can't be In Apocalypse Inless there Is sequenze set In more present.Time travel changes events It doesn't change when characters
were born.You have opotion of bringing In younger Nightcrawler.
I think you may be right. Just looking at Singer's quote:Think he just means it takes place inbetween all the movies because the timeline order. It's easier to look at as a follow up and sequel instead of reading into it too much imo. DOFP and Apocalypse are both FC follow ups, and continuing the franchise moving forward at this point. EVen if they go back to the OT later it will be because of the changes made in these films.
If Stryker doesn't freeze his son, we could see teenage Mastermind.Don't forget Blob! too!
Sequel to DOFP, prequel to next movie.Yeah I don't get that, especially when Singer calls Apocalypse another "inbetweenquel". In between what exactly?
Banshee and Havok would have to be played by older actors (40yo) if movie is in 1986-1987.
Well for QS hopefully he gets a haircut in the 80's! and have him look more I don't care what you think kind of look for him!
Oh there's absolutely no doubt that Quicksilver's inclusion was deliberate because of Marvel announcing him and Scarlet Witch as being in AoU...
How are you shaming X-men for supposedly doing one thing but applauding Avengers for doing the exact same thing?
What a weird post.
another case of "it's okay when Marvel does it, bot not anyone else"I have no doubt AoU's Quicksilver will be better than DoFP's, his look is awful and Aaron Johnson is more fit and better looking than Evan Peters, plus he'll be a featured character in AoU unlike DoFP.
i wonder if FOX is stupid enough to have a small scale third act action finale. after Avengers,MOS,TDKR.
they are trying to build up the next movie as something huge so that they trick us into watching this movie many times. it will not work. if its a distater it will underperform based on the budget.

Action of X1, X2, X3 was in 3 years, 2005-2007.they won't recast they will likely keep the same actors continuity sake, to keep the 3 films as a package
they will just make them look older, like for example Caleb Landry make him bulk up so he doesn't seem like a kid anymore and cut his hair to a more mature look
Action of X1, X2, X3 was in 3 years, 2005-2007.
Now we are talking about 25 years, 1962-1987.
Hoult, Lawrence are in makeup. Fassbender already looks for 50 yo. McAvoy have to be bald and needs makeup.
Landry and Till are too thin, both aren't at 4 above level actors. Too much of makeup, just choose older actors.
Damian Lewis or Zack Ward for 40+yo Banshee.
Action of X1, X2, X3 was in 3 years, 2005-2007.
Now we are talking about 25 years, 1962-1987.
Hoult, Lawrence are in makeup. Fassbender already looks for 50 yo. McAvoy have to be bald and needs makeup.
Landry and Till are too thin, both aren't at 4 above level actors. Too much of makeup, just choose older actors.
Damian Lewis or Zack Ward for 40+yo Banshee.
Is Kitty’s arc very different from the comic-book version [in the comic, she’s the one who travels back rather than Wolverine]. Well, yes and no. She has the power to ‘push’ consciousness and move someone. At the beginning of the film, she’s using it as an escape mechanism. She uses it to warn their group, the refugees, that they’re under attack. But then the challenge becomes: can they go deeper into the past?