I would happily take a European Centrist as a candidate right now.
A European Centrist could do insane things as American President.
A lot of those folks didn't turn out because of Biden and Harris being complicit on Gaza. Biden winning Michigan last time around was made possible by 200,000 Arab and Muslim Americans in Detroit. A lot of them stayed home or voted for Trump in protest.
I genuinely think Harris would have done better if she pivoted to the left. Even better would have been a candidate who could have distanced themself from the Biden admin while pushing progressive economy policy. You can see how Harris' support in the polls started to crumble in August as soon as she started to pivot to the centre and define herself as a continuation of Biden's administration. When people started to realize she was more of the same, she lost a lot of support.
I hate to say it, but if Dems want to win and making lasting change, social issues need to take a back burner on their platform for a long time to come. FDR had it right in the 30s when he focused on universal economy policy and combatting economic inequality instead of civil rights. He got a lot of criticism from activists at the time, but he believed that it would divide his party and coalition. However, the lasting changes he made to the economy and social safety net set up the long-term prosperity and security that allowed big civil rights changes in the 1950s and 60s.
The exit polls really make me think of Germany in 1933. People didn't like Hitler, he was a laughing stock Bohemian corporal to most, but people thought his grand promises would fix the economy and change the status quo.
Thats where it already loses me, because Trump literally told Netanjahu to go wild and all that.
On that people decided to punish the left for nothing because Genocide will happen under Trump.
That i guess was a nail in the coffin either way.
I get why she didnt distance herself stronger from Biden, afterall she is vice president.
But a stronger move to the left would have helped i think greatly.
I think more a problem was that she did not really tackle any of the peoples worries.
Not for nothing people kept talking about not knowing what she stands for.
She barely adressed the economy...a plus point for her and the democrats that was barely used.
Instead it was used by the republicans to go "If the economy is so good, why are things still so expensive".
And Harris barely adressed things like that.
I still dont get why Harris didnt made it a big argument that the economy was so good and the Job numbers so well.
By the end of the campaign it was just more of what Clinton did: "I am not trump".
Trump while lying about it, he at least adressed peoples concerns.
He blamed immigrants and all that on the high prices...but he adressed it at least.
Democrats often feel like they talk over people instead of with people.
While Republicans adress them...even if its just to lie and blame either immigrants or democrats.
It helps to adress peoples worries.