• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Do you believe in a higher power/God?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thing is that slavery then isn't the same as slavery now so it's hard to make the comparison.
No. Making people slaves for life, selling your children into slavery, physical abuse of those slaves--it's all expressly permitted in the Bible. Sounds pretty much the same to me. As if slaves being "treated well" would justify that command, anyway. "Be nice to the guy who bought you!" What? There is no condition under which that is not insane and evil, because in every instance we are talking about the ownership of human beings.
 
Slavery is awesome, if it is essentially consensual and features a lot of latex.

Saint is right, though. Slavery as a concept in the Roman Orient (and under the domination of the Egyptians, Babylonians and Assyrians before) is slavery in its entirety, with the owner having complete power of life and death over his slave. This should not be confused with types of slavery existing in the early medieval world, where slaves could have a degree of legal protection (see law codes of King Alfred of the Anglo-Saxons), or the later concept of serfdom.
 
It was actually an email i got that was a forward and basically has no source. So should be taken with a grain of salt.

Did you get that in the same email which said Barack Obama is a secret Muslim terrorist and that gays are going to push for bestiality and legalized pedophilia?
 
I ask, because EVERY email which seems to come from Christian conservative movements exaggerate the facts to the point of hilarious absurdity.
 
I ask, because EVERY email which seems to come from Christian conservative movements exaggerate the facts to the point of hilarious absurdity.


It just comes across at an attack on me when you post things like that.


The only thing in my post about that which could have been faulty is the date of it being up in congress again. Then you post something like that.
 
The only thing in my post about that which could have been faulty is the date of it being up in congress again. Then you post something like that.

The idea that Congress is pushing to require religious institutions, including hospitals, to perform abortions is faulty as well. But hey, that's what the Christian right does, it makes up lies in order to advance its cause.
 
The idea that Congress is pushing to require religious institutions, including hospitals, to perform abortions is faulty as well. But hey, that's what the Christian right does, it makes up lies in order to advance its cause.


Is anyone else reading this?


Seriously someone else please read the last 15 posts and explain to me how this is warranted?

Be sure to read such things as grain of salt and

and Barack Obama being muslim.
 
Is anyone else reading this?


Seriously someone else please read the last 15 posts and explain to me how this is warranted?

Be sure to read such things as grain of salt and

and Barack Obama being muslim.

You act as if I am attacking YOU. I am attacking the lies spread in that email while comparing it to other nonsensical garbage spread by the Christian right.
 
Did you get that in the same email which said Barack Obama is a secret Muslim terrorist and that gays are going to push for bestiality and legalized pedophilia?

Attacking an email i got and saying that i probably also get emails with such things as Obama being a muslim and Gays pushing bestiailty , no thats not directed at me at all

The idea that Congress is pushing to require religious institutions, including hospitals, to perform abortions is faulty as well. But hey, that's what the Christian right does, it makes up lies in order to advance its cause.

Yeah Wikipedia.com is a Christian right source that makes up lies in order to advance its cause.



You act as if I am attacking YOU. I am attacking the lies spread in that email while comparing it to other nonsensical garbage spread by the Christian right.


Again acting as if what i posted was inaccurate. You have no basis for this whatsoever. So yes again is still an attack on me.
 
Attacking an email i got and saying that i probably also get emails with such things as Obama being a muslim and Gays pushing bestiailty , no thats not directed at me at all

That's not an attack on you at all. That is an attack on the email culture of the Christian right.

Yeah Wikipedia.com is a Christian right source that makes up lies in order to advance its cause.

No, but the Christian right can contribute to Wikipedia and insert its lies into any article it wants to advance its cause.


Again acting as if what i posted was inaccurate. You have no basis for this whatsoever. So yes again is still an attack on me.

But it is inaccurate. This bill will never have a chance of passing committee with the language it currently has, let alone being voted on by the full floor of the House and Senate. To act as if this is something to worry about is absurd, but the Christian right forces people to worry about these sorts of things in order to advance its radical causes.
 
That's not an attack on you at all. That is an attack on the email culture of the Christian right.



No, but the Christian right can contribute to Wikipedia and insert its lies into any article it wants to advance its cause.

if you look up Freedom of choice act on wikipedia it automatically pulls up right wing christian views on the subject and no one contends it? I disagree



But it is inaccurate. This bill will never have a chance of passing committee with the language it currently has, let alone being voted on by the full floor of the House and Senate. To act as if this is something to worry about is absurd, but the Christian right forces people to worry about these sorts of things in order to advance its radical causes.

Just because it wont pass with the language it currently has does not mean as you described it is inaccurate information set out to scare christians into action.
 
I understand that this is a very serious, very heated topic. But if it can't be discussed respectfully, then perhaps it shouldn't be discussed at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,545
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"