DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 132,863
- Reaction score
- 80,450
- Points
- 203
It is the same thing. This what is weird about this. We are talking about things people do not control.well, the interracial thing would be clear racism.
I am of mixed ethnicity and thus a product of an interracial couple. so maybe I'm more intuned and sensitive to that issue.
As far I know, religion or the Bible doesn't promote racial intolerance. If it does, then I'm clearly mistaken. But, I'd like to think that most religious people, even those who are against gays, are not racist.
As for the distinction, I'm assuming it would have to do with biology or "nature's law." According to their religious beliefs, people of the same sex can't naturally procreate to have kids. therefore, that's considered "unnatural." At least that's the argument I seem to hear from that side.
With an interracial heterosexual couple, there would be no biological or "natural" reason why they can't procreate. So, you wouldn't be able to use the "nature's law" basis to oppose it.
At least, that's what I think the distinction would be, I guess.
Are you saying you have never heard of some religious folks using religion to justify racism? Not uncommon at all to manipulate the words. And why even say the bit about liking to think most religious people aren't race even if they are against gay people?
Science and nature have shown the "unnatural" things just isn't true. Ignorance is not an excuse.
But even still, even if you are ignorant and consider it unnatural. That doesn't stop gay people from existing. Trying to act like they don't exist, avoiding films because they may have a gay character, is utter lunacy.










t: