It's funny how I'm about to criticize Endgame for a bunch of the things I praised Infinity War on. Where that film's fan servicing and tonal mismatch felt playful and satisfying, here - considering the obvious goal of having to stick the landing and provide an emotionally resonant finale to the entire saga - it feels counterproductive and grating. The quips feel forced, the stakes feel surprisingly hollow. Endgame misses two key elements that were paramount to Infinity War's success (in my book): a clearly defined antagonistic force and the different dynamics that came to fruition when you placed these Marvel characters face to face with one another.
The physical threat of Thanos loomed large over Infinity War and grounded the film's emotional core. Since Endgame deals with time travel and essentially getting back the stones, it becomes a big trip down memory lane. Here's that scene from the movie you liked from a different perspective! It's fun and all, but in what needs to be a climatic finale, it plays like a big Marvel ********** with zero stakes. Infinity War was a movie that stood on its own two feet, whereas Endgame is a big 3-hour long remix. There is no real sense of danger. Emotional beats are trampled by misplaced comedy. The Infinity Stones are recovered so easily in this film it's borderline comical. There is a lot of show, don't tell in Endgame: characters tell us "we only get one shot, no do-overs"...until something happens and they get a do-over because of plot. The Avengers tell each other how near impossible this is going to be, how there's a big chance they don't make it out of this. But when push comes to shove, their mission plays so breezily. There's literally a scene where The Ancient One tells Banner there is no way she is ever giving him the Time Stone, for she is its guardian. She ends up delivering it to him five minutes later. I hope Tilda cashed that paycheck and traveled somewhere nice.
Infinity War had a ton of fun playing with the Marvel sandbox - think about Tony and Strange going after each other, Thor and The Guardians of the Galaxy working together. In a series that is all about its characters, these sort of relationships were where the MCU's strenghts were really at. This is mostly missing from Endgame. Remember the scene in the film's trailer with Thor saying "I like her!" to Captain Marvel? Well, the film does absolutely nothing with it. Marvel doesn't play off of Thor, or anyone else for that matter. For most of Endgame, these characters feel like they're on their own, despite working together. In fact, it's so ironic how they built up Captain Marvel as a character in the last year only to barely use her at all in this - she's Captain Ex Machina in this one, a super hero with barely 10 minutes of screentime, but who will definitely show up at the most opportune moments to save our heroes out of the mazes the writers set up for them. Did Brie Larson's schedule not clear up? Because I was under the assumption that she would've played a key role in this one, instead of being a convenient "get out of jail" free card.
I think Endgame begins on a very strong, dour note (which teases a much, much more interesting movie) and then is terrified to pursue anything that might alienate its target audience. All the different strands that Endgame builds up and feel that may lead to a juicy story - Cap's support group, Thor's PTSD, Black Widow's lack of purpose, Tony's unraveling and "rebirth" of sorts - are immediately dropped the second Scott Lang/Ant-Man enter the picture and the need for a "Back to the Future - Marvel Edition" come in. The more I think about it, the more I feel the bulk of the film's emotional wallop is in its first act. Which is just lazy writing, to be honest. And I haven't seen anyone commenting on this yet, but it's almost shocking how much of a short shrift The Hulk gets. Absolutely every single one of his arc developments in previous films are solved basically off-screen. Infinity War made a whole big deal about Banner not being able to transform into The Hulk anymore, you'd think this would have its payoff during Endgame. But this ends up being addressed via exposition. Remember when Bruce and Nat were supposed to be a thing? Because this film sure doesn't. It's not mentioned in any way, shape or form. No closure at all. It's a big problem with Banner/Hulk, but it sort of happens with most of the characters of this film. Their arcs don't feel organic anymore, they're not where they're supposed to be considering the MCU's chain of events. Tony Stark and Steve Rogers end their beef because Tony "doesn't want to hold grudges anymore". This might feel cute on paper, but holds absolutely no weight. It all feels haphazardly written so they can go on with the show. Plot trumps character in Endgame.
What Marvel is really interested in with Endgame is patting itself on the back for what they've accomplished over the last 11 years. And, honestly, kudos to them. But in the end, this is the cinematic equivalent of a star player coasting by its past achievements while basically phoning it in during the home stretch. And that's not to say that the film doesn't have its charms - like I said, it is fun to watch, the actors get some of their best material to work with here (RDJ and Evans are especially great), for a 3-hour movie, it goes by rather breezily. But in the immortal words of St. Patty, I just thought there'd be more.
Other quick thoughts:
- Thanos, who was Infinity War's MVP, gets maybe 15 minutes of screentime here and becomes a painfully dull, generic villain. It's baffling how so much of Endgame relies on self-sabotage.
- I have so. many. questions. about the whole time travel thing. The more I think about it, the less sense all of this makes.
- For all this talk of Endgame being Marvel's funniest film, I thought a lot of the jokes fell flat. Fat Thor was funny for a while, but then it felt like the film didn't know what to do with him anymore. His scene with Rene Russo was all kinds of clunky.
- I can't WAIT for people to start dragging this film for how it treats its female characters. itswhatshedeserves.gif
- Still on that note: since Valkyrie wasn't snapped, why wasn't she a part of the bulk of the film? God, there were so many missed opportunities here.
- Still on that note: that gratuitous scene with all the female Marvel characters in the final battle? Felt like the Russos throwing us a bone when they could've given us an entire piece of steak. You keep it, I'm not going to give you any points for that one
- About that final battle: what sort of Ready Player One realness? I wish I could be even remotely excited about that CGI blur I just watched.
- There is not a single scene as rousing as Thor entering Wakanda on this one. Cap wielding Mjolnir is cool, I guess, if a tad predictable.
- Either Don Cheadle was awful in this, or he just got the worst lines in the movie. Could be both, actually.
- Ok, the fate of Tony and Steve. Put me in the camp of people who also believe they should've switched roles in this. It would make much more sense for both their arcs if Cap was the one who died and Tony was the one who retired with his family. I remember after watching Infinity War that I was pretty sure where Endgame was heading, and that was with Stark's demise. But the way it played out here, it felt inorganic. And, come to think of it, kind of sadistic and cheap giving him a daughter and building up his father persona just to make him die. Cap staying in the past with Peggy is SO out of character. Dramatically, here's how I (humbly) propose this movie should've played out: Tony and Captain would, reluctantly, have been forced to work together to save the people from the Snap. Instead of making amends before their mission started, they'd gradually regain their trust in one another and the movie would end with Steve sacrificing himself for Tony (and The Avengers by proxy) and giving him the opportunity of resting alongside Pepper and his daughter. It would be an opportunity to solve both these character's arcs from Civil War during the climax and give them a proper send-off. Tony Stark's entire journey has been one of the arrogant, self-centered playboy who learns to love people other than himself. And Steve Rogers/Captain America fits better as the Messianic figure. A missed opportunity, I guess. Another thing that bothers me about all this is that I never, ever bought this entire Steve-Peggy Carter relationship. Every time they brought it up during these films, it felt incredibly shoehorned for me. And now I'm supposed to believe this is the relationship that's been most important throughout this series? Give me a break.
- All in all, this reminded be so much of The Dark Knight Rises - the finale to a saga where the beats play well, the directors craft some crowdpleasing moments, the experience is satisfying. But when you judge the movie with a bit more discernment, peel back all the layers, it gradually unravels like a house of cards. I'm very interested to see how this movie's reception will change in the long run. I'd wager that a lot of people who gave this good marks will reevaluate their opinion once the sugar high runs off.