- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 18,440
- Reaction score
- 23,574
- Points
- 103
She did want to take it up with the manager.
The Lokis are predictable. That's kind of the point. The turn is who did the backstabbing in this case. Also this is clearly at least the halfway point and thus concluding with a different ending doesn't really make sense. I get people not liking it, or anything really, but I don't see how this is a misfire considering the conclusion makes perfect sense considering the weeks of setup. It was the ending of the Dark Tower. Considering this adventure was very much The Dark Tower, it makes sense to me.But that's so predictable, even with the kiss they did, you knew she was going to still stab him and have her way. It's just they could've done something much more than just state the obvious. This compels me to want to watch what happens next in Doctor Strange and Quantumania, not really caring about the Lokis.
Sorry bro but this episode was a misfire.
That push continued Wednesday with the Loki finale. Without getting into spoilers (we’ll leave that to our Heat Vision colleagues), the Loki finale set the stage for Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. Hiddleston’s Loki character is also expected to also appear in the next Dr. Strange. (Marvel has yet to confirm whether or not that’s happening.)
To be frank, I didn't much like this version of Kang. Majors acted and sounded like a smart-ass from the hood. At times I thought I was watching a Spike Lee movie. Let's hope that next time he appears he acts like an actual villain, menacing and solemn.
I mean... there are a lot of villains that aren't solemn. The titular character wasn't solemn in his turns as a villain, and arguably the genre's most popular villain, The Joker, is... not exactly a solemn guy.To be frank, I didn't much like this version of Kang. Majors acted and sounded like a smart-ass from the hood. At times I thought I was watching a Spike Lee movie. Let's hope that next time he appears he acts like an actual villain, menacing and solemn.
I mean... there are a lot of villains that aren't solemn. The titular character wasn't solemn in his turns as a villain, and arguably the genre's most popular villain, The Joker, is... not exactly a solemn guy.
Exactly. And I think Marvel made a mistake by announcing Majors as Kang for Ant-Man 3. Imagine not knowing for sure who the guy in the castle was. People would speculate rather than just assume it is Kang because it is Jonathan Majors. Kang, I think, is the variant statue we saw at the end, not the the guy in the castle.Why are people calling him Kang? Kang is just a variant among millions. Technically, we haven't been introduced to the character yet.
To be frank, I didn't much like this version of Kang. Majors acted and sounded like a smart-ass from the hood. At times I thought I was watching a Spike Lee movie. Let's hope that next time he appears he acts like an actual villain, menacing and solemn.
So we still don’t know what the “King Loki in Asgard” footage is all about. I wonder if it was actually part of Sylvie’s nexus event.
I bought into the "it's another Loki" theory but I'm glad I'm wrong.
No, he goes around looking like a Doctor Who villain, with a giant TV for a head.That's true but Kang isn't going around with a giant horned helmet or with clown make up.
Imagine how ridiculous would have been if Thanos or Red Skull acted like the Kang variant we just saw.
Well, it was Loki who ended up being the real villain in the end. Sylvie was more Loki then she ever realized.I bought into the "it's another Loki" theory but I'm glad I'm wrong.
Well I’ll eat crow and admit I didn’t think they’d actually introduce Kang in the finale.