Favorite Solo CBM Franchise

Favorite solo Superhero series

  • Superman

  • Batman

  • Blade

  • X-Men

  • Spider-Man

  • The Hulk

  • The Punisher

  • Fantastic Four

  • Ghost Rider

  • Iron Man

  • Thor

  • Captain America

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
Now, when you ask someone what´s their favourite Batman CB, how many of them talk about 1950´s and 1960´s comics? I can tell you that, 99% of the time, i see people talking about DKR, Year One, Hush, TLH, etc. All Comic Books that have the opposite tone of 50´s and 60´s comics. Those are the one people talk about and recommend.


I didn't like any of those comics. Truth be told, the only Batman comics I liked were Arkham Asylum and Bermejo's Joker.

@Joker: I know you two are getting hot and heavy with your debate, but did you see my reply? It's probably a page or two back now.
 
And yet, ironically, they go in exact opposite directions. One is flashy, the other is functional and discrete. One has ears, to look pretty and "meow", the other has a functional piece of equipment that happens to resemble cat ears. That right there is Nolan not adopting Batman 66´s way of doing things. Ironically, again, since in your mind it´s more like "look, look, the 66 show inspired this". And yet, they actually represent opposites.

There are definitelly a couple of references to B66 in TDK trilogy. But that doesn´t change the fact that these movies go in a total opposite direction. There´s really not much to use besides a couple of masks.

Thanks for the useless explanation on the functions of Rises Catwoman suit. That really disproved that it isn't based off Newmar's Catwoman. It's just a giant coincidence they look exactly the same for the same character.

I didn't say the TDK trilogy goes in the same direction as West's campy camp show does did I. You said some crap that Burton's Batman still is inspiration to some movie but Batman 60's nobody wants anything to do with it. You just got put in the corner of being wrong for that. Not just with my example.
 
@Joker: I know you two are getting hot and heavy with your debate, but did you see my reply? It's probably a page or two back now.

Yeah I saw it, I just didn't see anything that needed a response from me. You said it has been like 10 years since you saw B&R so your memory is hazy on it, but you think both it and B'66 were bad at camp, you just enjoy B&R's more.

That's fair enough. Nothing there for me to argue with.
 
Thanks for the useless explanation on the functions of Rises Catwoman suit. That really disproved that it isn't based off Newmar's Catwoman. It's just a giant coincidence they look exactly the same for the same character.

I didn't say the TDK trilogy goes in the same direction as West's campy camp show does did I. You said some crap that Burton's Batman still is inspiration to some movie but Batman 60's nobody wants anything to do with it. You just got put in the corner of being wrong for that. Not just with my example.

Dude, if you read my comments, you will see that i already acknowledged, more than once, that we can see references to the B66 in some modern works. What i´m telling you is that nobody seems eager to reproduce, in any fashion, the true essence of B66. When i say "nobody wants anything to do with that", what i mean is that nobody wants to approach Batman like they did in 1966. That´s gone.

B89, on the other hand, is clearly still a much bigger influence in the new movies than B66, and it isn´t even close.

And not just B89, but dark Batman in general. Year one, DKR, etc. Those are the kind of works producers, writers and directors seem to be interested in, and not the campy stuff from the 50´s and the 60´s.
 
Alright sure you're right nobody wants to take it back to the campy camp stylings any more. But you need to re-word your phrases because nobody wants anything to do with that sounds like nobody wants anything to do with anything from that show and that's bull.

The campy style may be out, but the series isn't. It still gets it's foot in the door every so often in some way. Hathaway's Cat look is one of the biggies.
 
Last edited:
Alright sure you're right nobody wants to take it back to the campy camp stylings any more. But you need to re-word your phrases because nobody wants anything to do with that sounds like nobody wants anything to do with anything from that show and that's bull.

The campy style may be out, but the series isn't. It still gets it's foot in the door every so often in some way. Hathaway's Cat look is one of the biggies.

Fair enough. I don´t hate the show. But i certainly want it to keep being a thing of the past. As a thing of the past, it´s inoffensive, so it´s safe to show love for it. But if WB announced the next Batman movies would be campy style, maybe you would see some of that love simply vanishing and being replaced by vicious hate.
 
But in honesty do you think people would run because of the show, or because of flashbacks of Schumacher's travesties. I think those POS are the ones that made camp look like Satan's spawn.
 
I never said they'd like to see it as campy, I said there would be interest simply because it's Batman. Batman attracts interest because he's a popular brand no matter what form he comes in.

I was under the impression you said people didn´t want more dar Batman. I don´t see any strong evidence of that.

Then you've been hearing it from the wrong places. Or doing selective reading. Either way it's a wrong impression you got.

Not really. I think this is just an example of how opinions and perceptions can vary from place to place, social circle to social circle.

That's not a wrong notion. If most people disliked it, the ratings would show that. That's basic math. If there was an existing divisiveness or majority of hatred that would show in the stats ratings somewhere. Anywhere. I have asked you to show me anything that could indicate this, and all I've gotten is your impression based off your little social circle. Oh wait yes and Kevin Smith being scared to admit he's a fan once upon a time.

It´s pretty common for movie to have high ratings with a low number of votes. Around 20.000 votes, TDK had almost a perfect 10 on IMDB. TWS was in the 9´s. TDKR was in the 9´s too. There are movies that drop over 3 points as the number of votes increases. It´s not too far fetched to assume that if B66 had 100.000 more votes its rating would be a little lower.

That's a flawed analogy. It would take more than one million people out of the entire world to give a show the kind of status Batman 1966 has. Furthermore out of all the people who would rate it, no matter what website you look at, the if 9 million out of the 10 million majority didn't care for it that would be reflected in the stats.

Again this is common sense. If most people don't like something then it doesn't get high ratings. 2+2=4.

You´re being too literal. I´m just giving you an example. I´m not saying B66 only had 1 M viewers.

What i´m explaining to you is that something can be very successful without the majority of the population who know about it liking it. Millions and millions know about B66. But only like 10 or 20 k care enough to vote or give opinion about it. Those 10 k could easily just be the hardcore fans. 10k is a freaking small number. So, if from all those millions, can only have access to the opinions of 10 or 20 k, and that opinion isn´t particularly GREAT(7.5 is good, not great), how are you so sure that all those other millions that don´t even bother to talk about the show actually like it?

I´m not even saying the show is hated by the General Audiences. I´m simply saying that i don´t get the impression that it´s loved by everyone who knows about it.

Of course double the budget back is enough for a movie to make a profit. Unless the movie had a lot of costs like marketing, then it wouldn't be profitable. That's why movies like Dredd which didn't even it make it's budget back are not getting a sequel, despite it's critical success and general popularity, it didn't even make it's budget back. The sad reality is that movies can be panned but as long as they make money they keep getting made. That was the case with Ghost Rider. It made money. It made profit. Enough to warrant a sequel.

A movie which has a production budget of 100 M can easily spend an additional 50 M on marketing. Some movies will spend even more. Then, you have the theaters cut. I don´t know exact numbers, but it can vary from 20 and 40%. Then you have taxes. 40%? I don´t know, something like that. If you take all those things in consideration, it´s not very difficult to imagine a scenario where Ghost Rider actually loses money. The Harry Potter movies lost money, according to WB, and they made much more than just 2x.

Based on what i´ve heard from producers and directors, i´d say a movie like Ghost Rider would need around 400 M to make a profit, at least.

This is a vague flimsy answer. Give me examples of something that had the level of success and popularity of their day like Batman '66, that is now considered crap today.

I´ve already gave you an example. Batman 66 is certainly not seen with the same eyes it was in 1966. This is a fact.

That's usually when something very dated is improved upon in almost every way that it makes the previous movie unwatchable.

Exactly.

For the umpteenth time, if the majority of people didn't like the show, that would be reflected in it's ratings. For example the movie you were comparing this to earlier, Batman and Robin, we know the majority dislike that. How? Poor ratings, poor critical reception, general bad word of mouth about it anywhere you go.

Tell me you can show me the same kind of evidence against Batman '66.

The number and variety of opinions we can have access regarding B&R it´s like 200 times bigger than B66. It´s much easier to a draw a conclusion out of a film everybody remembers and talks about than a show from the 60´s that has no more than like 10 k people online voting on it.

I haven't got any stats that show millions of ratings of high votes for TDK, or The Avengers, or The Godfather, but we all know the G.A. loves them because of the high ratings they have. The general positive word of mouth they get far outweighing any bad mouthing they get.

10 k, my friend. That´s nothing. That´s not even my neighborhood. You can have access to over 1 M votes on TDK and TA. That´s something. 10 k is nothing.

Honestly, this conversation is absolutely over. I´m not gonna continue going around in circles with you.

I don´t believe B66 is loved by the majority of people who know about it. The best you could do was to show me 10.000 people who think B66 is a 7. That´s hardly any indication of unconditional love. 7 is not a great rating at all. It´s good, not great. A show that was as loved as you say, would easily have over a 9 with 10.000 votes. The show might even be more liked than disliked, but it´s certainly not seen as great, and there is certainly a good percentage of people who don´t care about it, and nothing you´ve posted until now is enough to change my views.
 
Simply because Superman (1978) and Superman II (1980) are my 'go to' CBM's I will say this franchise. Appreciate III, IV were not great but I do have a soft spot for Returns.
 
EDIT: Shinobi got banned. What a surprise....

I was under the impression you said people didn´t want more dar Batman. I don´t see any strong evidence of that.

I don't know where you got that impression from. I flat out said earlier that dark Batman is what the audiences want now, and that's great.

Not really. I think this is just an example of how opinions and perceptions can vary from place to place, social circle to social circle.

Not indicative of any consensus though. For example you can find websites dedicated to people hating on something really popular. That doesn't mean it's a general common opinion. It's easy to be misled by reading in the wrong place.

Hell if you go on the IMDb forums you'd think the whole world and it's mother hated Chris Nolan.

It´s pretty common for movie to have high ratings with a low number of votes. Around 20.000 votes, TDK had almost a perfect 10 on IMDB. TWS was in the 9´s. TDKR was in the 9´s too. There are movies that drop over 3 points as the number of votes increases. It´s not too far fetched to assume that if B66 had 100.000 more votes its rating would be a little lower.

Low number of votes? TDK has over a million votes. TDKR has over 900'000. For IMDB those vote numbers are HUGE. The likes of The Empire Strikes Back and The Avengers don't even have close to that many votes:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080684/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/

The fact that the majority of the 10'000 votes that B'66 does have are high should tell you that if it had more then the score would be higher.

You´re being too literal. I´m just giving you an example. I´m not saying B66 only had 1 M viewers.

What i´m explaining to you is that something can be very successful without the majority of the population who know about it liking it. Millions and millions know about B66. But only like 10 or 20 k care enough to vote or give opinion about it. Those 10 k could easily just be the hardcore fans. 10k is a freaking small number. So, if from all those millions, can only have access to the opinions of 10 or 20 k, and that opinion isn´t particularly GREAT(7.5 is good, not great), how are you so sure that all those other millions that don´t even bother to talk about the show actually like it?

I know you're giving an example of 1M viewers. I'm using your scenario that you created to explain why it's faulty thinking. It takes millions of people, a sizable number, to elevate Batman '66 to the status it has.

If IMDb was a website geared towards the comic book fan base, like this website is, I would agree the votes could be predominately Batman fans or comic book fans. But it's a general movie website. The biggest on the net.

It's just one of several statistical sources that show the votings whether they're in hundreds or thousands, all weigh in favor of the show. There's nothing else to show otherwise. There's no big bad word of mouth against the show to show that there is a heavier scale of hatred against the show. You can only go by the facts, and the love and influence the show still gets.

I´m not even saying the show is hated by the General Audiences. I´m simply saying that i don´t get the impression that it´s loved by everyone who knows about it.

Fair enough.

A movie which has a production budget of 100 M can easily spend an additional 50 M on marketing. Some movies will spend even more. Then, you have the theaters cut. I don´t know exact numbers, but it can vary from 20 and 40%. Then you have taxes. 40%? I don´t know, something like that. If you take all those things in consideration, it´s not very difficult to imagine a scenario where Ghost Rider actually loses money. The Harry Potter movies lost money, according to WB, and they made much more than just 2x.

But it didn't spend 50M on marketing. It didn't make a bad profit. That's what I'm telling you. The fact it got a sequel means the profit it made was enough to warrant a sequel. Movies that don't make profit in this game don't get green lit another multi million dollar sequel. Doesn't happen.

Lots of movies lose some money. It's if they make enough of a profit to justify a sequel is what counts.

Based on what i´ve heard from producers and directors, i´d say a movie like Ghost Rider would need around 400 M to make a profit, at least.

I don't know where you heard that from, but it made a profit, that's why it got a sequel. Even the god awful second one made a profit which is why they were considering a third one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7NCfwmCHTw

If only actual good movies like Dredd made a profit like this.

I´ve already gave you an example. Batman 66 is certainly not seen with the same eyes it was in 1966. This is a fact.

No movie is seen with the same eyes decades later as it was when it was released. That doesn't mean they are not loved by the consensus as so many great classics can attest to.

The number and variety of opinions we can have access regarding B&R it´s like 200 times bigger than B66. It´s much easier to a draw a conclusion out of a film everybody remembers and talks about than a show from the 60´s that has no more than like 10 k people online voting on it.

That's because Batman and Robin is a more recent movie, with more notoriety attached to it. But that doesn't change the fact that the numbers, be they 10k or 100k still reflect the consensus for the movie. Most people think it's bad.

10 k, my friend. That´s nothing. That´s not even my neighborhood. You can have access to over 1 M votes on TDK and TA. That´s something. 10 k is nothing.

It's 10k more evidence than you've shown to show any kind of consensus towards the show. I don't have access to 1M votes for TA, or The Empire Strikes Back, or a lot other big popular movies, but that was my point. You don't need it to know how loved or hated something is.

Honestly, this conversation is absolutely over. I´m not gonna continue going around in circles with you.

Fair enough. For what it's worth I feel the discussion has run it's course, too.

I don´t believe B66 is loved by the majority of people who know about it. The best you could do was to show me 10.000 people who think B66 is a 7. That´s hardly any indication of unconditional love. 7 is not a great rating at all. It´s good, not great. A show that was as loved as you say, would easily have over a 9 with 10.000 votes. The show might even be more liked than disliked, but it´s certainly not seen as great, and there is certainly a good percentage of people who don´t care about it, and nothing you´ve posted until now is enough to change my views.

You can believe what ever you wish. It was never my intention to try and change your view of this, just defend my own since you decided to challenge it in the first place. My stance was not primarily based on just the high ratings for it, but the influence it had and still has in movies, video games, and comic books.

I never said the show was unconditionally love either. You keep overstating what I said. I said the majority like it. It is not 50/50 or most hate it. That was and always has been my stance. There is nothing that shows otherwise. But plenty that shows that most like it.
 
Last edited:
Our nitpicks, who art in message boards, pedantry be thy name.

How exactly is it "pedantry" when the word SOLO is clearly stated in both the thread title and the poll question, and the first post specifically calls out superHERO in the singular sense?

DarthSkywalker is many things but I doubt mind-reader is one of them. It isn't his fault the intent of the thread wasn't communicated clearly.
 
My gut reaction is to say Batman because he's my favorite character, but upon further examination, I have to say Captain America.

There are only two Batman films out of eight that I really, really like. Whereas Cap is the only character batting 1000 for me so far.
 
Last edited:
Right now it's pretty easy for me: Iron Man. But Captain America has a better average per film so far and if Civil War is great then I'll be changing my vote to him.
 
There are only two Batman films out of eight that I really, really like.

Eight? We've only had seven Batman movies, unless you're counting the 1966 TV show spin off movie, too?
 
^I think that's implied. I've only liked 1 frankly(Begins).
 
I'm going to have to go with Batman. Though I only like half of them, 3/4 of the ones I like are significantly higher than the rest of the genre to me. While others may be more consistent, they don't reach the same heights.
 
I would agree with that. The Dark Knight is my favorite superhero film, and I think it's the best one by a fair margin. However, I feel like it's against the spirit of the thread to base your answer on the strength of individual films instead of the franchise as a whole.
 
In that spirit I think Batman still wins since most would agree he's had more good than bad, and two of them have been really prominent to the CBM genre.
 
I would agree with that. The Dark Knight is my favorite superhero film, and I think it's the best one by a fair margin. However, I feel like it's against the spirit of the thread to base your answer on the strength of individual films instead of the franchise as a whole.

Batman has five of my favorite CBMs of all-time (Batman 89, Mask of the Phantasm, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises). No other superhero franchise can boast that level of quality over that many films.

X-Men has only two, maybe three films at that level. None of the others have more than one.

Batman also only has one film I would classify as 'junk,' which after nine films is pretty good. X-Men, as a comparison, has two 'junk' films in only seven films.
 
Last edited:
This was a very tough choice for me. Pitting the unapologetically dark tone of Blade against the drama of Batman against the adapted mythos of Spiderman gave me more mixed emotions than Kyle Rayner in New Guardians. I might have a difference answer if you ask me 5 years from now, but right now I'd say Spider-man.
 
In this order:

Iron Man
The rest of the MCU, including AngHulk (something about that movie I enjoy)
Spider-Man
Batman
Superman
 
In this order:

Iron Man
The rest of the MCU, including AngHulk (something about that movie I enjoy)
Spider-Man
Batman
Superman

You would rank every single MCU solo franchise higher than Spider-Man and Batman? Damn.
 
I know I would. And over the X-Men as well. Easily.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"