Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Indeed. I was pronouncing it right the first time, but then changed when I saw something saying it was Ga-doh. I shall revert back to using the "t".

Indeed. I was pronouncing it right the first time, but then changed when I saw something saying it was Ga-doh. I shall revert back to using the "t".
And going back to Gal, I wonder how many reporters are going to totally butcher her name when this movie comes out.I only really trust native reporters (in her case, Israeli) when it comes to proper pronunciation...
I think Jae Lee's WW looks very much like Gal. I'm a little surprised it hasn't been brought up before.
Really depends on each woman's frame. Gal is clearly physically incapable of getting there, unless she does some extremely unhealthy things to her body.
Plus elite-athlete shape isn't like, required of everyone who starts a fitness program. You can decide how often you go the gym and how much you lift and how much you eat and what supplements you take, etc. There's a huge spectrum. It's not like one round of Crossfit = T2 Linda Hamilton.
Yeah, that's what I tell women too, because my arms are my most complimented feature.At least, compliments coming from women.
And going back to Gal, I wonder how many reporters are going to totally butcher her name when this movie comes out.I only really trust native reporters (in her case, Israeli) when it comes to proper pronunciation...
I think the point people are trying to make is not that these images look like Gadot, but more so that someone with Gadot's frame can satisfyingly play WW.
Animation holds as much weight as the comics in regards to their realistic merit. I, for one, think that your "ideal woman" argument is still coming from a man's perspective. Does WW really need DD's and hips to be attractive? I want to also point out that your definition of beauty is unique to you, especially when you compare it to a woman's perspective. She's not meant to be a sex symbol, but more the physical representation of feminine strength. This doesn't necessarily mean that she should be a body builder (I still think you should have used another image to support your point) as WW is still supposed to be beautiful, but it also doesn't mean she has to be incredibly curvaceous, either.
I do, however, think that her figure will change more favorably to what you want as she continues to train.
I may have to retire from this thread.
The fact that some people are still picking fun at her weight, even as she busts her ass to get in shape for this role, is ****ing despicable.
Instead of getting petty and juvenile and borderline mysogynistic with the actress, if you still have a fundamental issue with her playing the character, take it up with the man who hired her in the first place.
I foresee plenty of butchery. Ioan Gruffudd used to get it all the time (but his name admittedly looks difficult to pronounce unless you know how say his last name) and so did Ralph Fiennes (eg Ralf Fee-ennes instead of rhyming with "safe signs").
Hopefully in actual interviews she'll set them straight, unless she's too polite to do so.
![]()
Wonder Woman
(by Jae Lee)
uh-oh. WW doesn't have any muscle definition.![]()
It stands to reason that the serum would have an effect on his muscle mass and bone density along with a few other things according to comic book science fiction. Either way the casting should reflect that in some way...ie Chris Evans has really big muscles. Where do you find this same rhetoric for the casting of wonder woman outside of the superficial reasons.The super soldier serum was intended to make a physically perfect person, not a roid freak - we have no idea what that would be like. It stands to reason that the person would meet many peoples ideal attractive man.
Correct. They design the characters accordingly. Big women are drawn big, buff women are drawn buff and woman that look like wonder woman are drawn like wonder woman.And no, all women adapted for animation do not have Wonder Woman's build for the cartoons. They too are adjusted accordingly.
The funny thing about people who want a perfect WW is it's so contradictory. They want her to be sexy, but also want her to be huge in terms of muscle definition. That's fine in the comic books but in live action it needs to be more balanced...she ain't gotta look like a bodybuilder, just someone in very good physical condition.
It'll be just as bad as it was with Antje Traue. Though, admittedly, I still don't know how to pronounce her name (completely) properly either.![]()
Michael Turner's Wonder Woman is the first one that comes to mind. Also how she was portrayed during her first several years. But I wouldn't call Gal Gadot a waif, especially after the recent photo, and considering that she's only going to gain even more bulk and muscle in the coming months.
I know that and I was saying her frame isn't the same as the animated pictures frames.
But Wonder Woman is a sex symbol just as much as she is anything else....it's not something I've projected onto her but something inherent in her character. Have you ever looked at any of the WW covers from the 40s? Again, I've never called for her to look like a porn star, just not a stick figure or boyish. I'm not just going off of what I think is attractive but what society on average as a whole considers to be "ideal". If you take a poll of 1000 you'll find the results to be similar. I'm not going off of what appeals to me solely personally because obviously that's not for everyone.
I doubt it but we'll see.
Both have freaking wide and gorgeous cheekbones.I don't see any similarities to Gadot's body type.
This is getting ****ing inane. People have gone from "discussing" a casting choice to using this topic as personal resume for what supposedly makes them qualified to deliver commentary on said casting choice.
Michael Turner's Wonder Woman is still quite curvy.
![]()
![]()
I don't see any similarities to Gadot's body type.
Not sure what your point is by bringing up the Turner example.
This.I am having a bit of difficulty understanding how the animation stills are so much different from Gadot's current frame. Could you describe the differences you see? Also, WW is a sex symbol currently for all the wrong reasons. Most of the time, she's drawn like a porn actress. I am not knocking porn stars, but it's not necessarily a flattering image to project onto women, especially one who's supposed to be strong inspiring figure to all females. She's been drawn a multitude of ways, however, and some are drawn not too differently than where Gadot's at now. I don't see how a waistline of breasts take away from her character. Also, if you really want to delve into mythos, Aphrodite's supposed to be the most beautiful in the eyes of the Greeks, and their definition of beautiful can be very different from what you theorize to be our modern society's preference. Also, women may have a completely different description of the "perfect" woman in their eyes. Curves are subjective.
I kinda agree with that.The first pic is definitely what I am hoping.
are we really comparing real human bodies to fictional drawn/animated bodies??
c'mon, people. Gal will look fine for the role.
Yet she also has the ridiculously abnormal muscle definition which you and Kev despise. If you defend her curves here (which are still unrealistic btw) how do you invalidate the musculature? Can you choose one or the other? I am not trying to corner you here, but I just need some justification.