Ghostbusters II Appreciation

What was the scene about? I know in the montage you see Slimer eating Tully's lunch. Then there's that "oh, its you" when Slimer pulls up in the bus.

So you guys really thought GBII was scarier than GBI? I was absolutely frightened of the terror dogs when I was a kid.
 
GB1 has frightening moments like the Terror Dogs and the library ghost, but I think GB2 has more such moments. The heads on the stakes, Ghost Janosz, many of Vigo's scenes, the slime in the bathtub, even the slime creature attacking Ray when he first finds the river of slime.
 
I agree. I always thought Ghostbusters II had a lot more creepy stuff in it.
 
GB2 did feel kinda more like a straight-up Horror film at times with Comedy moments in it, whereas in the original it was the other way around. They both did a great job merging Horror and Comedy together.
 
What was the scene about? I know in the montage you see Slimer eating Tully's lunch. Then there's that "oh, its you" when Slimer pulls up in the bus.

I know of two deleted scenes for sure. One where Tully runs into Slimer a 2nd time at the GBHQ. And he puts on a proton pack and tries to "bust" Slimer. This scene makes sense to why Tully decided to a be a GB out of the blue in the movie.

342294.1.jpg


There's also a moment that takes place after the GB investigate the museum and Vigo's painting, where Vigo possesses Ray as he's driving the Ecto1. There's a few seconds of it in the montage.

I also heard that the jewelry store moment in the montage was a deleted sequence to itself.
 
There was also a scene during the ghost montage near the end where a frog-like creature was encountered in a subway tunnel that got deleted because the crew thought the monster looked more funny than scary.
 
I've been meaning to purchase the 4k blu ray of Ghostbusters . I'm glad I can just hold out for this release. As a kid I thought GB2 was too creepy and weird , but since then it has grown on me. Peter MacNicol's scenes are more amusing to me than annoying nowadays.
 
Janosz was always one of my favorite characters from either film, IMO he has some of the funniest moments.
 
Ghostbusters and Back to the Future are the rare films that can blend different genres and still keep a very broad audience. Causual people can like them, and geeks too due to the awesome world building both franchises have.

I think only Edgar Wright films these days have that sort of appeal.

Well, The first two Robocop movies did that very well too
 
I didn't get a chance to watch either film today for the anniversary, maybe on the 16th. I kinda want to wait it out in a way too for the Blu-ray set, so eager to see how they look in HD.
 
Another aspect of GB2 I like that I find is kinda overlooked is that the ghosts in it seemed more rooted in reality in a way. Vigo has a lot of similarities with Vlad Tepes and the Scoleri Brothers were murderers before their execution. I think it gives the movie an edge in a way, having the ghosts be a little more based in reality than just a typical movie monster.
 
I saw it in the theater when it came out. And liked it then.

I rewatched it again recently on Netflix some weeks ago. And I still do. I recognize nostalgia as a vice not a virtue so it's not that either. It's just thoroughly entertaining all around. I love the Slimer bus gag and lots of little things. Sure there's the dated elements here and there but whatever.
 
I find both movies have held up nicely and are still infinitely rewatchable and entertaining.
 
I've read about that scene. I hope we see it along with the others. Seems like there's tons of deleted material from it and the original cut of the movie might've been quite different from the final cut.
 
Hopefully it'll be included, I can't imagine why it wouldn't.

I also just realized GB2 will be 25 this Monday, can't believe it's that old already.
 
And today's the day. 25 years ago today GB2 came out. I'll try to watch both movies later if I get anytime. Anyone else seen GB2 or will for today's occasion?
 
I had no idea it was its 25th anniversary today. I may watch it later tonight on Netflix.
 
AICN:
GHOSTBUSTERS 2 celebrates its 25th Anniversary today and here's why you should give it a second chance!
Nathan Dally said:
Why did it take 5 years to make a sequel to one of the highest grossing films of all time?

Enter Columbia Pictures CEO David Putnam.

By all accounts Mr. Putnam was very anti-Ghostbusters, he apparently loathed Bill Murray to the point where he would publicly air his grievances against the actor. During a speech at a British-American Chamber of Commerce banquet, he was quoted saying that Murray was "an actor who makes millions off movies but gives nothing back to his art. He's a taker."

The original film was a massive gamble by Putnam’s predecessor, Frank Price. A Hail Mary pass by a desperate studio. Had anyone but Frank Price been the head of Columbia when Ghostbusters was brought to the studio, it would have never seen the light of day. In a corporate sense, Ghostbusters was Price’s legacy. The last thing David Putnam wanted was to bolster someone else’s legacy. David Putnam wanted Columbia to be an Oscar factory, green lighting what he saw as "respectable" films. Needless to say once the studio needed a reliable, sure hit, Putnam and his burnt bridges were out and Dawn Steel, first female to head the Studio, was in. Priority number one on Steel’s agenda? Ghostbusters II.

It’s March 1988. Legendary CAA agent Michael Ovitz is sitting at a table with his clients Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray Ivan Reitman & the late, great Harold Ramis. The back dining room of famous Hollywood showbiz restaurant "Jimmy’s" is covered in "no ghost logo" posters and left over merchandise from the first film. Ovitz has a mission; bury the hatchet between certain members of the creative team. Who was mad at whom and why isn’t known, some say it was money, while others say ego. In the end Ovitz succeeds and a few hours later the four men agree to dust off the PKE meters and strap on their proton packs. However, getting the principle players to commit isn’t the same as signing on. Months of negotiating followed with each party taking a piece of the back end in lieu of major upfront salaries. Back at Columbia Pre Production is fast tracked to meet a summer '89 deadline.
 
I sadly didn't get time to watch the films yesterday, I'll likely see them again when I get the Blu-ray digibook in September. Can't wait to see how both look in HD.

Which reminds me, is it just me or is GB2 one of the most modern-looking 80s movies ever? For a 25-year old movie, it doesn't really look it's age not counting some of the outdated tech, of course.
 
I've seen both so many times. Does anyone else also watch both every New Year's Eve? An annual tradition of mine never broken.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"