'H2', Rob Zombie's sequel to 'Halloween'

1, 2, 4, 5, 6
1, 2, H20, Resurrection
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, H20, Resurrection

The above are the most common continuities/paths that are taken with the Halloween movies. Much of the reason these various paths are taken is due to the fact that Halloween: H20 and Halloween: Resurrection seem to disregard the events of the fourth, fifth and sixth sequels. However, there was a scene written for H20 that connects all of the films, having one of Laurie's students mention Jamie's death in a report. It was ultimately written out. Laurie does mention that she faked her death after the events in Haddonfield and it's also explained (in Halloween 4) that Jamie's parents were dead. But, John and Jamie would be so close in age that they must have been twins had all films taken place within the same continuity. That would imply that Laurie left one of the children behind and took the other, and that doesn't make much sense.
 
So what are they going to do for Halloween 3D, erase Busta Rhymes from existence.

busta.jpg
Oh god....:csad:
 
Yes but alot was made clear those events happen in that film. from the flashback scene at the start to the speech the kid gives, up until the old woman says the people of camp crystal just want to be left alone, he just wants to be left alone.

In that case then, if those events happened, and the 2009 film fits into that continuity...wouldn't Jason being fighting Freddy or be captured and frozen. And wouldn't he be a HUGE well known item, and people would not be going anywhere near Crystal Lake to begin with?

I'm sorry, but were exactly did it make it clear?
 
??Wha? Did Jason's mother not get her head cut off? By a girl? At a camp? Details aren't that important appearently, which is why we're having this long discussion about stuff not related to directly to RZH2

Its just no way with this new FT13 movie it can be a sequel to parts 4 and ignore everything from parts 5-10.

With them showing JAson's mom getting killed in the beginning, it was clearly a remake. If it was just a H20 like seqquel ignoring eparts 5-10, they just would of went with Jason coming back from the dead.
 
Contin. 1: Debra Hill and John Carpenter - Halloween I and II
Contin. 2: Halloween III, IV and V - Various writers
Contin. 3 - Halloween VI and H20 - Malak Akkad
Contin. 4 - Halloween and Halloween H2 - Rob Zombie.

Absurd. In H3, they show the first film as a movie on tv...in H4, they say that the main character of the first movie is a real person and died in an accident.

There is no way to work 3 and 4 into the same timeline. (unless you're real open minded)
 
But also thought 4-6 ignored from parts 1 and 2, but know you told me i understand.

How many times are you going to do this in every thread you go into? You make a statement about a movie, and then everyone has to point out where you are wrong. HAVE YOU EVER ACTUALLY SEEN A SINGLE MOVIE IN YOUR EXTREMELY SHORT LIFE?
 
How many times are you going to do this in every thread you go into? You make a statement about a movie, and then everyone has to point out where you are wrong. HAVE YOU EVER ACTUALLY SEEN A SINGLE MOVIE IN YOUR EXTREMELY SHORT LIFE?

I asked a question man, back off.
 
In that case then, if those events happened, and the 2009 film fits into that continuity...wouldn't Jason being fighting Freddy or be captured and frozen. And wouldn't he be a HUGE well known item, and people would not be going anywhere near Crystal Lake to begin with?

I'm sorry, but were exactly did it make it clear?
They said its like a sequel between 2,3, and 4. Thats what the writers said.

It happens after 2, but not before 5.
 
I SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY, hope you get banned for this comment.

Why? I told him to back off. Did not flame him or anything. All I did was ask a simple question. He went off on me for no reason.
 
It makes perfect sense, you are just too young to realize it.
 
They said its like a sequel between 2,3, and 4. Thats what the writers said.

It happens after 2, but not before 5.

But that would make zero sense at all with 2,3, and 4 happening one after another with no room or rest between films. That's absurd. But I think the producers really meant to say it's going to be more LIKE those films, instead of meaning that it would FIT into those films.

It happens after two but before 5? WHEN WOULD JASON HAVE THE TIME? After 2, he goes to the grocery stores and kills, the woman there watches the news report of what happened just the day before, and from there we have Part 3, then the axe to the head, sent to the morgue and Tommy, that's Part 4. JASON WAS DEAD..D.E.A.D. AS A DOOR NAIL AFTER 4!! Then Tommy just had to be dumb and ruin that. haha
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,560
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"