Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows - Part 2

What did you think of Deathly Hallows Part 2?

  • Magical!

  • Almost perfect

  • Bloody good!

  • Decent

  • Meh

  • Overrated

  • Not bloody good at all

  • Glad it's over

  • Reboot! Reboot! (that's for you, Matt :P)

  • I only saw it for the Dark Knight teaser

  • Magical!

  • Almost perfect

  • Bloody good!

  • Decent

  • Meh

  • Overrated

  • Not bloody good at all

  • Glad it's over

  • Reboot! Reboot! (that's for you, Matt :P)

  • I only saw it for the Dark Knight teaser


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've seen the film three times and just now learned that the person flying into the battle on the broom is Oliver Wood.

Wow, I didn't even notice that. I thought it was Neville flying on the broomstick. BTW, don't we see Oliver Wood in the ROR too? I thought I saw him in the background.
 
Wow, I didn't even notice that. I thought it was Neville flying on the broomstick. BTW, don't we see Oliver Wood in the ROR too? I thought I saw him in the background.

Room of Requirement?
Maybe while running around outside of the room, if that's what ROR means.
I looked at the credits, then looked at the wiki and it's clearly Wood on the broomstick. (That last part of the sentence made me giggle.)
 
I've seen the film three times and just now learned that the person flying into the battle on the broom is Oliver Wood.

Maybe because every theater I see the film in sucks. First time, I was in the second row of the theater and everything was distorted, second time I had better seats, but the projector was dim and flickering, third time, the picture was muddled, dim and blurry, half the sound system was broken and this woman brought her jacka** child with her.
I'm going to have to see it again just so I can actually get a good experience with the film.

I thought that was him, i knew he had a cameo in it..

I'm really hoping ill notice buckbeak somewhere in there too.. I really wish he returned like in the book
 
I was really impressed with how they de-aged Alan Rickman for the Prince's Tale flashbacks.
 
Did they de-age him? I thought something seemed different about him, but he looked completely natural and normal to me. That's an excellent bit of special effects work.
 
I'm pretty sure they de-aged him with at least makeup because he did look younger, I was impressed by how seamless it was.
 
Most of all, he looked thinner to me. It was freaky (in a good way).
 
Most of all, he looked thinner to me. It was freaky (in a good way).

That's what really tipped me off. He looked almost like he did ten years ago with SS.
 
:pal:


I would be quite creeped out too if Voldemort hugged me.

Evil dudes don't randomly hug people....

What I thought of at that moment in the film.

stalin_childhood.jpg
 
Interview with David Yates.

What Got Cut from the Final Harry Potter Movie? And What New Scenes Were Added?



Meredith Woerner —Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows Part 2 went out with a blinding magical explosion. But why did director David Yates and screenwriter Steve Kloves choose to make so many changes from J.K. Rowling's book? And how did these changes make the story different?
We talked to Yates and Kloves, and found out about the film's deleted scenes — plus scenes from the book that were never filmed. Plus the new scenes they added!
We caught up to Yates and Kloves at the Potter junket, and they told us about the changes they made to the film.
First up, what was on the Potter cutting room floor?
David Yates: We've got a whole bunch of DVD [deleted] scenes that we took out of the movie. We never, ever say oh it's going to be three hours, of three and a half hours, or 90 minutes. It's whatever feels right when watch the film alone in the dark. Ultimately that's what determines the length of the film. And this film felt the right weight, and the right shape and the right rhythm, at two hours. But we saved all the bits that we cut out, and we're going to put that on the DVD extras.
There's a version of Aberforth and Harry — a longer version of it that we got. There's an extended scene on the beach with Ron disguised (before he gets to the bank, there's a lovely little interchange with him and Bellatrix Lestrange.) There are a number of things that we have for the DVD.
Why did you change the Great Hall Battle?
David Yates: In the book, they circle each other in The Great Hall in front of lots of students. I wanted to extend it across the school, I thought it was a great visual opportunity to see those two figures fighting amongst the rubble, through different parts of the school. And I was sitting in my garden trying to think of a way to give it a bit of extra meaning. Because two guys fighting all the time kind of gets exhausting after awhile. I came up with this notion of Harry just looking at Voldemort while they're on this precipice, and pulling him over. That was my eureka moment in the garden while I was having a cup of tea. And I thought that could be really beautiful, these two figures just tumbling into the abyss and then conjoining in this weird way. If would be quite haunting and expressive.
There was actually more battle between the two of them. There's a moment, which you probably saw in early trailers, where Voldemort is looking at Harry in the eye and he says, "Why do you live?" And then Harry says, "Because I have something, to live for." It was a really cool moment. I actually asked Steve to write it. I said Steve we've waited eight movies, I want Voldemort to say something and Dan [Radcliffe] to respond. And of course when I put it in the movie, and the reason that Steve didn't write it in the first place was because, Voldemort would just kill Harry. They wouldn't stop and have a conversation. It was in the movie and you had this slightly longer sequence of them fighting. When you pull it out of the trailer it looks quite cool, but in context it felt slightly belabored and a little self conscious. So we kind of lost it.
Why did you choose to add in the scene in The Great Hall with Snape?




Steve Kloves: It's not the way the original script was. It evolved. And that happens in these sometimes. It become about compression, and a feeling, and how can we reveal the emotion of it most succinctly? That's what always ruled the day.
I liked particularly in The Great Hall one moment… [Harry] seeing Snape standing where Dumbledore would stand, and saying, "How dare you stand there, where he stood?" That's really what the emotion of it was for Harry. That he [Snape] would defile this place by killing the head master. That was the best way to express that visual. That's a good example. To me that's a good move, for us. Because it's a visual and a literary stroke. And that's what we tried to do in Potter, rather than always be in lockstep with the book, although emotionally we're absolutely in lockstep with the books. Which was always our guide.
 
I liked this (I like all the movies to an extent), but I liked Pt1 a lot better.
-I wouldve liked more with some of the characters. Ginny, Hagrid (wouldve liked to see him fighting), Lupin and Tonks, etc.
-It felt very humorless even in DHPt1 there was a good amount of humor. I didnt really feel it in this one
-This is probably to keep the rating but I really liked the pages of Harry walking across the grounds, seeing all the dead bodies. You get that in this but it seemed a lot worse in the book
-I didn't like The Ron/Hermione kiss in the movie. It felt really awkward and out of place
-I felt like there were a good amount of unintentional awkward scenes. The entrance to the chamber of secrets (Harry talks in his sleep scene), The HAgrid/Harry scene post battle scene, etc. Especially the Harry/Hagrid scene I thought that shouldve been a lot better. Hagrid was the first person of magic Harry remembers meeting
-THe epilouge (honestly not something I loved in the book either) idk I wish it was a little longer and little more dialogue and i think Ron's old person make up couldve been better. PS. It's so funny how much older GInny looked just with that "old lady" haircut. The makeup for Daniel Radcliffe was really good

All in all, it was still a really good movie. I enjoyed the hell out of it. I didn't think it was perfect but it was damn good.

It's really sad to see HP go. THe first book came out when I was 5 or so, now I'm 19. I dont think there ever has been and willl be a long time before something like HP happens again. This is a multimedia franchise/phenomenon that lasted well over a decade with little to no breaks in between. We saw these kids grow up. I grew up with them. I remember watching the first movie with my brother and mom and I went to go see this one with them again in the same theater. It was very nostalgic. I know I'll be talking about HP for years to come

7.5/10
 
Last edited:
Overrated! It's as bad as the Twilight movies to me.
 
No emotion from the actors, there were too many cuts between already lackluster and slow action scenes, the battle was too small, and Harry's death and aging was truly horrible looking. Besides where were the paintings of the headmasters applauding for Harry?
 
Overrated! It's as bad as the Twilight movies to me.

The Star Wars prequels were as bad as Twilight movies.

Harry Potter is just ****ing beautiful. :o
 
No emotion from the actors, there were too many cuts between already lackluster and slow action scenes, the battle was too small, and Harry's death and aging was truly horrible looking. Besides where were the paintings of the headmasters applauding for Harry?

Opinion: Officially invalidated.

I can think of literally dozens of scenes from Part 2 alone that prove you wrong.
 
No emotion from the actors, there were too many cuts between already lackluster and slow action scenes, the battle was too small, and Harry's death and aging was truly horrible looking. Besides where were the paintings of the headmasters applauding for Harry?

At first I thought you were just a casual movie fan but it seems like your one of those superfan that want everything in the movies.

But I'm guessing your just trolling so whatevers...
 
Just ignore him...

MOVING ON.

Been watching the final speeches from the cast at the world premiere. Really liked the speeches from the big 3...particulary Rupert and Emma.

[YT]u2gNajTw76I[/YT]

[YT]auNMA9a7YIc[/YT]
 
I love JK's speech because she thanks Columbus. Everyone rags his Potter films, but forgets that he cast the big 3 in their roles. I'm glad he moved away from the franchise, but the ensuing HP films owe a lot to Columbus.
 
I really wanted to like this movie. I've liked all the movies so far. Not loved, but liked. But this movie just seemed...bland? I don't know if that's the right word. It just didn't have the weight I wanted it to. Hardly any character besides the big 3 got screen time, and it seemed like they were rushing toward the final confrontation with Voldemort that was disappointing to me. He just dissolved?

All the promotional stuff called this movie the "epic conclusion", but 7.1 felt more epic to me than 7.2.
 
The Star Wars prequels were as bad as Twilight movies.
Pump the brakes. I'm no prequel lover, but I'd take Jar Jar over sparkling vampires any day of the week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,819
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"