wow I edited right away and you nubs still got me. sorry lol.No he didn't, please stop posting that.
wow I edited right away and you nubs still got me. sorry lol.No he didn't, please stop posting that.
Yeah, but it's at least physically possible to dress up like a bat or clown.
Again, I did think Two-Face looked cool, but the way he just casually walked around with half his face freshly burned away wasn't the most realistic part of the film.
How could two face even be casual about walking around with wounds that bad? IMO Not possible.
A.Two Face is missing all of his left cheek and the majority of his left lips. With injuries like that there is no way possible that he wouldn't have a speech impediment.
B.Two Face only has one eyelid. Without an eyelid his left eye in about a minute it would start to cause him harm over time he would go blind in that eye and the actual eyeball would begin to deform.
C.Some movements Two Face makes are physically impossible to make with the missing muscles/injuries he has.
The more I think about it, the more I can accept The Joker and Two-Face not returning for another film. It's about more than Two-Face probably being dead, or having to recast The Joker. Just think about it: what could you possibly do in another film - with either character - that wouldn't feel like a diminishing return? Both characters just had phenomenal journeys in this film.
By no means did I want Two-face to have a speech impediment. Im just saying he would have one if it was played out more realistically. I think it would have been downright horrendous if they gave him a speech impediment.It would've been way too distracting if Eckhart tried to convey some sort of speech impediment while talking. I think it would've taken away most of the performance.
-TNC
I kinda feel the same way too, especially with Two-Face. I wouldn't want him to become a standard, cliche bad guy. Now I'm sure if Ledger were alive, Nolan and co. could've probably written an awesome extension of his character in a third film...but with him gone, it would feel too forced in bring in another actor...it would also stretch the suspension of disbelief that the Joker could continue to terrorize the city unstopped after already being apprehended by Batman. Imo, a better idea for the third film would be to bring in fresh villains...with may be a passing reference or nod to the Joker being locked in Arkham, and/or prosecuted.
Two-Face was brilliantly played and the special effects looked frighteningly real. I only jumped at two points in the movie. The fake Batman hitting the window and Harvey suddenly screaming at Gordon in the hospital.
Although I was surpised at how my emotions changed towards him. I went from pitying this guy to thinking just how self absorbed he was.
He lost Rachel, big deal. No reason to hold a gun to a little boys head.
AARON ECKHART is TWO-FACE!!!
Oh and I love this movie!
By no means did I want Two-face to have a speech impediment. Im just saying he would have one if it was played out more realistically. I think it would have been downright horrendous if they gave him a speech impediment.
nstead of taking that route, what if The Dark Knight introduced Dent, showed his White Knight pursuit of justice, and ended with his fall and the rise of Two Face? Would that have totally bankrupted the point of the movie? Would that have left Harvey in place for a powerful sequel dealing with his role as an underworld boss different from the previous Falcone/Maroni mobsters? Does his death rob Nolan of a great character on which to base a subsequent narrative? Does it rob Batman of one of his greatest villains with which to have a more dedicated outing the next time?