Days of Future Past Have you seen X-Men: First Class? Post here!

What did you think of X-Men: First Class?

  • 10 - X-Cellent

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - Lame, give it back to Marvel already.

  • 10 - X-Cellent

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - Lame, give it back to Marvel already.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice.

How do Scott and Ororo appear? Does Charles find them with Cerebro or something?

Xavier is testing Hanks new prototype (Proto-Cerebro if you will) and first gets a massive rush and isn't able to control it very well but then we get several instances in where he was able to pinpoint several mutants, Ororo and Scott included. Scott is playing a game of catch and Ororo is taking notes or reading a book.

I could tell you how Wolverine fits into it but I don't want to spoil it for you.
:)
 
Yea i'll wait for that one :D Thanks though man. Looking forward to seeing this on Saturday.
 
I hope you'll love it as much as I did. I'm seriously head over heels.

I can't stop thinking about it
 
By far.

I hated, hated, hated Wolverine.

X3 was meh, had its moments but overall not the true successor.

First Class on the other hand just turned it up a notch. It evokes the most X-Men sensation out of all the X-Men movies. It's definitely on par with X1 and X2, with repeated viewings it could become my favorite in the series period.
 
You guys are killing me with these praises.

I've longed for the return to grace of the X-Men franchise. Fox robbed the fanbase of probably the first perfect trilogy of this genre in '06.

I hope I have that same feeling after the screening tonight that I had after X2...that I wanted another X-Men film immediately.
 
I'm honestly surprised at the reviews this movie has been getting. I think it was apallingly bad, and I'm so sad that this is the next entry in their franchise. I guess this has to be spoiler-tagged at the moment...?

I didn't find much to like - the film was an overwrought, overlong mess of poor acting, poor characters and characterization, poor humor and a bland story. There were minor surface level problems, but then there were deeper issues I had with the story they were trying to tell.

Minor issues:

- They used some random house in England to stand in for the mansion, rather than filming for a day or two in Vancouver at Hatley Castle. As annoying as the change to the Alkali complex in XMOW.

- They used Gnarles Barkley for a dance club scene set almost fifty years before the song was even written.

- Since when can Beast run at super speeds?

- X1 continuity altered: Moira invents the term "X-Men", rather than the kids at the school. Beast develops Cerebro, not Magneto (perhaps Magneto will physically build the Cerebro we know in a sequel). Xavier learns of the thought-blocking helmet, but 40 years later has no idea how Magneto is shielding himself.

- What happens to the special booth if normal customers sit there and set a glass down on the magic button? "Whoops, shouldn't have put my drink there!"

- I thought Banshee flew through a continual use of his sonic scream - how does he manage his turn upwards once he's stopped screaming?

- Also on Banshee, while I'll buy he can bounce his scream off a sub like sonar, how does he read it once the waves come back at him?

- Why, exactly, can't Darwin "adapt" to what Shaw does to him?

- If you've got the tech to build jets and Cerebro and laser-blasting chest diffusers, why is your television giving out the most scrappy, aged, vintage display? Is it because Magneto turned the satellite dish and messed up your reception?

- Why wasn't Mystique's voice, in her blue form, the electronic form that she has in X1, X2 and even X3? I thought the point was that, just how she has no "original" human form, she has no real original human voice, and that was a nice touch. Nevermind.

- Why couldn't Emma transform back into diamond after the fight with Xavier and Magneto - because he'd caused a flaw in the diamond and it could shatter, I'm assuming ("just tap her")? But why can she transform back later in the film?

- Why didn't Emma escape her government captors, given she could not only use her diamond abilities to break through the glass, but has mental powers that presumably could have controlled or confused the men involved?

- Is Mystique really super-strong enough to catch the weights when they drop on her, and with no seeming effort or even a bend of the arms as she strains?

- The tone was more campy than I expected. Way more James Bond/Austin Powers than I'd hoped, or ever would've pegged for an X-Men movie.

Bigger problems:

- The villains in this movie were like a carbon copy of the Brotherhood in X1, right down to their roster and ultimately their world-devastating plot. The Brotherhood consisted of a powerful megalomaniac, a right hand woman with a strange visual form and a bit of martial arts, a funny-colored guy with some speed and agility on his side and a bit of a brute who almost never speaks a line of dialogue - and yes, that's Shaw, Emma Frost, Azazel and Riptide that I'm describing. Their archetypes, their relationships, the three men and one woman lineup - it was all really familiar. And their big plan? A radiation machine, which will leave mutants unaffected (apparently, as Shaw claims, mutation has only developed as a result of radiation, so... all of the X-Men have at some point been exposed to radiation, I guess) but will devastate the rest of the world; for Shaw, it will kill humans, and for Magneto, it will mutate them. I think Magneto's idea is actually a bit more clever, given it would make the world like him and force mutants into the majority, rather than just killing people for killing's sake. And the reason why Magneto has this hatred of the world has a compelling, emotional backstory - I was never really sure why Shaw wanted to kill everyone, other than the standard movie villain "must take over the world" desire. Magneto's ties to a real-world genocide gave that universe such a serious tone, and it was a move that I loved compared to Spider-Man (where industrial accidents turn men into super villains); but Shaw was just some rich weirdo, a la Lex Luthor, and had no obvious motivation. If Shaw's goal was also mutant superiority, then I have to say that they not only copied Magneto as a villain but made their copy inferior. In-universe, of course it would appear that Magneto is the one ripping off Shaw, right down to a machine that he grips tightly and is powering/powered by, but in the real universe, it's the writers just repeating a plot we've already seen.

- The minor characters, especially the kids, were a cast of uninspired choices from the comics. Admittedly, there are some classics (Banshee, Havok), but then there are the weird ones - Angel, Darwin. Who chose to pursue these characters instead of the "first students" Xavier had in the first film, like Jean, Storm and Cyclops? I guess casting was an issue, because you could've made a bunch of thirteen-year-olds play these characters in your first film, but if you turned it into a trilogy (or more) you'd quickly realize none of these kids were growing up to look like Famke, Halle or James once they hit their 20s. So they went with other characters - but still, there are characters people love and know better than Angel or Darwin. Gambit? Psylocke? Heck, if you're discounting X3, even the original Angel could've been there instead. And while X1 took characters I never gave a damn about in the comics and made me really like them (Cyclops, Jean, Wolverine), XMFC hasn't made me care whatsoever about either of those two. Their inclusion feels a little pointless and like a wasted opportunity.

- Mystique. I'm not a stickler for comic canon; I wasn't bothered by the changes to somebody like Rogue in X1. So I'm not bothered by the idea, in principle, that she was Xavier's adopted sister; I just think it was executed poorly. She just so happens to break into Xavier's house, which is a lucky coincidence for them both (where were his real parents, btw? Who agreed to let her stay all that time?), and becomes his little sister. She gets to live the good life, rides his coat tails to Oxford, and essentially spends 18 years by his side. I can somewhat understand how she began to feel like she was the third wheel when Xavier was trying to pick up girls, although not why she wanted him to have a romantic interest in her after growing up as his sister all that time - but I can't buy that his lack of interest in her was enough to push her to Magneto's side as soon as he tells her to accept that her blue breasts are "exquisite". They put no effort into showing us whether Mystique was a proponent of Xavier's ideas of equality; I can only assume that all that time that she lived with him, she secretly harbored resentment towards human beings (although she makes no mention of having been scared to go to school as a child, or what her life was like before), in order for her to suddenly accept the fact that Magneto was willing to kill "thousands of innocent men". This was such a sudden leap, and I can't believe she switched sides so easily given how long she lived with Xavier and how close I assume that would have made them. I think it makes more sense, character-wise, for Mystique to have been a damaged young girl who was tortured or threatened by humans, and was scared - like she said in X1 - and was found by Magneto and offered a life of safety and superiority. I can't buy that she was that scared little girl, and then had nearly two decades of living in a rich mansion with no need to ever steal food again, and then decided that she'll chuck it all in to side with a guy who tells her she's pretty. It makes her so one-dimensional, especially after Magneto likens her to a tiger and calls her a creature - and she then tells Xavier that he's the one who views her like a pet. What? Who's the one treating her like an animal here?

- Emma Frost was a total waste. I will never understand the appeal of the diamond form, given I thought her greatest strengths were her demeanor and her conviction. She was the kind of woman I thought you wouldn't want to cross because she was tough, not because she can turn into a diamond and beat you up. Yes, she has her telepathy in this film, but she's more useful when she's cutting ice off an icecap to put into your drink. The character was so unlike what I expected of Frost that I wish she hadn't been in the film. The rumor of Sigourney Weaver for the role back in the days of X2 made me assume they had plans for a strong woman who would've gone head-to-head with Xavier or Jean based on sheer force of will, and she's been reduced to a girlfriend who wears as much lingerie as possible.

- Speaking of lingerie, was there a woman in this film who didn't run around either naked, or in panties, at some point? No, there wasn't. Emma uses her mental powers to mentally make out with a Russian, and sits on the sideline watching him make a fool of himself - but both her mental projection and her real self are stripped to bra and panties. Why? Couldn't her projection have stripped while she stayed clothed? I guess the film needed even MORE **** and ass on display; it further reduces Emma's character, which is a shame. The closest you get to male flesh is a small circle of Havok's chest, because apparently writer Jane Goldman thinks women find men more appealing with clothes on than off. Obviously not the same case for the women. I'm not suggesting that the men should have all stripped, just questioning why all the women had to. Forget even trying to apply the Bechdel test to this film, since it would fail (not that the other X-films were that fantastic, but the girls just didn't seem so sexualized to me). And Moira - poor Moira - reduced to a memory of a kiss, and then the butt of a joke about women not having a place in the CIA.

- The kids felt underutilized and poorly tacked into the movie. In the first films, the kids were - rightly - treated as children by the adults, who were the responsible ones who were trained to go out and save the day. Rogue was involved in the plot by dint of being kidnapped by Magneto due to her powers, and the kids expressed in X2 that they still had need of adults, for safety and guidance and help. Here, the kids are little more than a way to track a few more kids into the theatre - teen appeal - while acting as members of the army that Xavier and Magneto need to put together... why? In X3 (and I'm no huge fan of X3, believe me), the only reason they let the younger members tag along was because Magneto had assembled an army. Shaw has no army, and I can't believe that the kids, untrained as they were, were going to be that much of a help compared to Magneto and Xavier. After we first meet them, they are victims of an attack on the compound (thank god we knew it was a Covert CIA Research Base due to the endless location subtitles), but they never lift a finger to use their powers, instead choosing to run screaming until the very end - and then only one or two even think about fighting back. I tried to forgive this, telling myself, "they're kids, not warriors, just the same as they were in the other films". Except that five minutes later, they're not scared, they're subject to a terribly split-screened training montage which transforms them from the helpless kids they were into the battle-ready X-Men with a little cliched motivational figurative prostate massaging from Xavier. That's all it takes for Havok to learn to aim his powers, and for Banshee to learn to navigate and turn and land while he flies? Thank god it's that easy, and thank god that the Americans, the Russians and the Hellfire Club decided to hold off their approach to WW3 while they took a couple of days to train themselves.

- Perhaps the most disappointing part of the film, storytelling-wise, is the way they portrayed the relationship between Magneto and Xavier. I would have thought, based on the comics (and, somewhat, cartoons) and the first films that these two men had once been friends. I'd imagine they had found one another, each the only other mutant they'd ever come across, and that this formed a bond between them - that they were both young, educated and intelligent men with gifts beyond scope and a common goal to try and help the world. And somewhere along the way, after perhaps a few years (or months, if need be) of this friendship, there was some kind of fracture and they split on either side of the human versus mutant debate. A debate that they barely touch upon in this film, seemingly because it's better to set up the "surprise" that Magneto actually agrees with Shaw, hates human beings and would happily kill them all. They spend much of the film being friendly (but not great friends), but hardly discussing their varying sides of the issue on whether mutants are superior or not, which was the foundation of their relationship and argument in the first film. What unites them in this film is only a common goal of taking down Shaw, and perhaps one scene in which Xavier really helps Magneto (with a memory). They're not the only two mutants, alone in the world, given that they find at least ten others within days of even meeting each other. They're not shown to be with one another out of any great respect, or even like, for one another; they're just associates, working together. Magneto breaks down after paralyzing Xavier, as though he's just lost a dear friend - although he's only known him for a few weeks. Did he expect they would remain friends after his trick with the missiles? What would have driven them to work alongside one another, given Magneto's feelings all along were that he hated humans and that he barely broached the idea of mutant superiority with Xavier - such a huge issue, for them both, but something they couldn't discuss because it would have immediately made them realize they could not be friends. Instead, they're forced together for the sake of a government operation, and we're told that they were friends once, even though it only consisted of being acquaintances for a few weeks back in 1962. Not the friendship I imagined, at all - the one where I assumed they had perhaps founded the school together properly, that Magneto had helped build Cerebro so they could both find mutants and help to train them (and thus, would have learned that curved metal plays some part in telepathy and known that making a mini-Cerebro to fit around his head might block Charles), and defected later, causing a traumatic split for two men who had been great friends. It might have worked better if, after the Nazi occupation and the end of the war, Erik had escaped to England and found Charles as a young boy, and the two had grown up together as adopted siblings in the way that Xavier and Mystique did. Then, the war between these two "brothers" might have had some impact, and their falling out might have meant something more than "Oh, hi, nice to meet you, sorry to hear you want to kill the human race, bye now".

Positives:

- Fassbender as Magneto did a better job than I'd expected, and I was really enamored of the character. I didn't notice his accent slips as much as the friends I saw the movie with, and I thought his revenge quest was not only emotionally interesting but made for exciting viewing in a very Kill Bill way. In fact, I think he probably could have driven his own movie centered around that story; perhaps one in which Mystique could have played a better, and different role, and come to his side in a different way (for example: she works as a CIA agent, mirroring her government involvement in the Dept of Defense from the comics, and she "hides" amongst humans that she secretly fears... until her work puts her on the trail of Magneto, whose international death wish revenge scheme has drawn attention, and she follows and fights him but is ultimately seduced by his goals of mutant prosperity and the allure of being her true self). If they do sequels, I can only hope that he's definitely involved. McAvoy was good, too, although I really hope he ditches the temple-touching next time around.

- Some of the FX were better than I'd expected (that chain sequence on the boat with Magneto was great), although some weren't great (Banshee flying, especially the first time, or Shaw's Shiva arms). Overall, though, they were generally better than not.

- Rebecca Romijn and Hugh Jackman - their cameos were fun.

- The film was not just mindless... it had something to say. I'm just not sure that what it had to say was all that great, or that how it said it had as much of an impact as I would have liked.
 
- X1 continuity altered: Moira invents the term "X-Men", rather than the kids at the school. [...] Xavier learns of the thought-blocking helmet, but 40 years later has no idea how Magneto is shielding himself.

As Vaughn said, minor details like these are unimportant.
 
I don't agree with that. That might be his opinion, but it's not fact, and I don't think any of the changes made for a better film, or helped them tell their story.
 
Man, so that guy [blackout] on twitter who said he saw Hugh Jackman on the set of First Class was not joking [/blackout] after all!!
 
I don't agree with that. That might be his opinion, but it's not fact, and I don't think any of the changes made for a better film, or helped them tell their story.

Well, what you said is opinion too, not fact.

Your post was so long, complex, pedantic and almost indigestible that I'm not going to go through it bit by bit, so we'll leave it that you didn't like the film. Which is fine.

There's far too much in your post/rant for one of those point-by-point rebuttals. When it gets to that level of displeasure, I don't think much can be done to counteract it!
 
Well, what you said is opinion too, not fact.

Your post was so long, complex, pedantic and almost indigestible that I'm not going to go through it bit by bit, so we'll leave it that you didn't like the film. Which is fine.

There's far too much in your post/rant for one of those point-by-point rebuttals. When it gets to that level of displeasure, I don't think much can be done to counteract it!

It's a shame that having an opinion is discounted as "pedantic" because it happens to be wordy. I've been a fan of X-Men since I was a little kid, and I had a lot to say. If you can't be bothered to read it, why bother to reply to it?

Yes, the notion that the changes made didn't help the film is an opinion. That changes were made is a fact, and I simply stated that Vaughn's opinion - which was presented as the reason for the changes - was a dissatisfactory one, again in my opinion.

I think what I wrote is perfectly understandable, but perhaps it's too much to ask for discussion or discourse instead of insults because my opinion doesn't seem to match your own.
 
It's a shame that having an opinion is discounted as "pedantic" because it happens to be wordy. I've been a fan of X-Men since I was a little kid, and I had a lot to say. If you can't be bothered to read it, why bother to reply to it?

If you weren't expecting people to say something in response, then why write it?

I'm saying it was just too much to respond to, in my opinion. We'd end up in one of those lengthy point-by-point rebuttals that would serve no purpose ultimately. So I'm telling you that I started to read it, but then gave up because it seemed to me like an endless tirade.

Yes, the notion that the changes made didn't help the film is an opinion. That changes were made is a fact, and I simply stated that Vaughn's opinion - which was presented as the reason for the changes - was a dissatisfactory one, again in my opinion.

I think what I wrote is perfectly understandable, but perhaps it's too much to ask for discussion or discourse instead of insults because my opinion doesn't seem to match your own.

I read some of it then gave up on the idea of replying, because it would become too involved and take too much time and forum space. You raised so many things and seemed so angry that I thought it better left alone. I'm acknowledging that you made that post and have a strong negative opinion, but leaving it at that.
 
If you weren't expecting people to say something in response, then why write it?

I'm saying it was just too much to respond to, in my opinion. We'd end up in one of those lengthy point-by-point rebuttals that would serve no purpose ultimately. So I'm telling you that I started to read it, but then gave up because it seemed to me like an endless tirade.

I don't want people not to respond. I just don't see the point of responding to say, only, "I did not read what you said". Without knowing how much you read, I can't gauge your opinion of what I said other than you're dismissing it based somewhat on length. If you don't want to get into a point-by-point discussion, that's okay, although I'd welcome it from anyone because I like to discuss and debate things. Not argue, or "tirade", as you put it. Discussion would be nice, and having an open dialogue with people about what they agree or disagree with in terms of what I said would be great.

I read some of it then gave up on the idea of replying, because it would become too involved and take too much time and forum space. You raised so many things and seemed so angry that I thought it better left alone. I'm acknowledging that you made that post and have a strong negative opinion, but leaving it at that.

I'm sorry you think that it would take up too much forum space... because I thought the forums were here for our discussion! Again, if you don't want to be the person to reply to such a lengthy post, totally understandable - I'm not begging for your time - I just don't understand the point of ridiculing me by calling my opinion "pedantic", "a rant" and "undigestible". I gave my honest opinion of a film that disappointed me, but I don't get why you felt the need to insult me unless you're personally annoyed I happened to write something so long. There's no suggested word limit on our posts, so I don't see how it's a problem.

Like I said to begin with - if it's too long to reply to, don't bother. Telling me it's too long to reply to is going to achieve... what, exactly? I respect that someone puts some time into their thoughts (whether you agree with those thoughts or not) rather than posting a very hollow "it was ****, it sux haha" such as you might find on imdb.

I'm not angry at this film; I'm disappointed, because I had high hopes and expectations. I saw the first trailer and thought it looked amazing, and the final film I watched last night fell short of that, and short of the strength I think X1 and X2 established. I came on here to discuss that with others who've seen the film, whether they agree with me or not.
 
Last edited:
definitely the movie that just made me love the X men.... never been a fan of the saga so far (even the Singer movies that I found nice but nothing mindblowing for me)!

But this one is :wow::hrt: cant wait for a sequel !
 
Yea I demand a sequel, we never even got to see how Nightcrawler was conceived!
 
Ted makes some great points that people need to at least look at.


Two key points he makes is the lingerie-loving in the film and the character relationships.
We all love a little lingerie but it got distracting and just got really odd at points. As for the characters? Man, I thought I was watching Twilight or something. No substance and there was no room for me to care about any of the mutant kids. This was due to the writing being average and the actors not being very good.
 
definitely the movie that just made me love the X men.... never been a fan of the saga so far (even the Singer movies that I found nice but nothing mindblowing for me)!

But this one is :wow::hrt: cant wait for a sequel !

Since I'm coming at it from virtually the exact same perspective, I hope I have a similar reaction to yours.

17 hrs to go.
 
I agree with truth - I think tedw addressed most of the problems I had with the film (and a few I hadn't realised yet, like the continuity errors that I really dislike - Vaughn may say its unimportant to him but its important to me - why stay within the same universe if you don't retain things like that?).

When thinking of how I might rate this film its tough to even consider going above 5 out of 10 because to me there are actually no fully positive points - the effects are the closest because there were some good ones but by the same token there are some terrible ones (diamond form, flying etc...). Fassbender played a great Magneto but his accent slips were disjointing, McAvoy also was a reasonable Xavier but his character history with the womanising and drinking felt forced, Mystique being linked to Xavier was an interesting premise but very misplayed and she was very one-note. Basically, every positive comes with a negative for me and then on top of that there are plenty of flat-out negatives alone.

It is a shame that overall it felt so mtv to me - mostly the young mutants and one scene in particular involving:
those kids coming up with their mutant codenames - terrible!
There was not enough soul to this piece and I think there was too much consideration of effects for the trailers than securing a solid story with believable characters (especially believable villains like we got in X1 and X2).

P.S. What a waste of Emma Frost's character - she could have been so much more!
 
I've just realized this is the first time I've ever posted in the X-men section of the Hype!

Well, I just got back from seeing First Class. Let me preface my review by saying I was a massive fan of X1 and X2, when X3 came about interest in the series started to get lost on me, then Wolverine came a few years later and really all investment I had in the franchise was gone. When news broke of a prequel film set 30 odd years before I really didn't give a rats arse, didn't care for any news, who was cast, who was directing, I really thought this was merely a desperate attempt to squeeze whatever money was left out of the series, I didn't give this film a hope in hell. I'm a extremely pleased to have been proven wrong. First Class is not only a great X-men film, on par with X2, it's one of the best superhero films of the last few years.

Generally I'm against prequels because you know how the story turns out, so all suspense is gone, yet somehow Matthew Vaughn has managed to create a compelling and frankly important piece of the X-men movie puzzle without making the story feel suffocated by the stories that come afterward. To put it bluntly, this is possibly the first prequel that genuinely works.

This is really the story of Eric and Charles. There's something about seeing these two particular characters in their prime doing their mutant thing as it were which is fantastic. McAvoy and Fassbender are brilliant, whilst each does there own things with their respective characters, neither one is downright impersonating their older counterparts in Stewart and McKellen, and yet they genuinely feel like the are the same characters as portrayed in the future films. The chemistry between them is fantastic, and even though the relationship begins and degrades a little too quickly for there to be a long term bond, the results are still great to watch. Fassbender is powerful, you feel like he'll turn at any moment, McAvoy charming and charismatic and the eternal optimist. I cannot speak highly enough of these two actors in what was always going to be very difficult roles to pull off.

The big surprise to me was how much Mystique features in the film. To say the character was one-dimensional in the previous films is an understatement. Jennifer Lawrence brings an emotional heart to the character, she's a shadow of the character that appears latter on, in this Raven is almost the girl next door, she's almost heartbreaking to watch at times. I guess the problem that I have with Mystique in this film is that it seems like too big of leap for me to believe that the woman who appears in X-Men is the same girl who appears in First Class, the characters are just too different.

Kevin Bacon as Sebastien Shaw is pretty damn good too, as is the rest of his crew, only January Jones gets any real screen time though (kudos to the effects team for Emma Frost BTW). The young First Class members are also solid. I will say the casting for this movie was superb, no-one really puts a foot out of place and everyone holds there own, no bad performances to be found anywhere.

There are several highlights for me, the first being how they recreated the concentration camp sequence from the first film, it seriously took me a few moments to realize it was a shot for shot remake. The finale on the coast of Cuba is fantastic, probably the best final battle of an X-men film to date, it's tense and visually spectacular, and seeing the characters in the yellow and blue costumes was really quite awesome, they some how managed to make work what I thought was extremely difficult.

Overall Vaughn has managed to make a film that stands side by side with the first two films of the X-men movies series. I guess the only major problem I have is that given how the film ends I wonder if they may have put all their chips into this hand, you could easily pick up the story where X1 begins, I would have liked to have seen things maybe stretched over a sequel or two because the story arc is a little rushed, especially if their intention is to make a prequel series, but other than that it's still a damn fine movie. It works on an entertainment level, a story level, an emotional level, and has one of the best cameos ever. And for those of us who were disillusioned about where the series had gone, this is a welcome return to its former glory. A message to all studio execs: This is how you make a prequel.

A very well deserved 8.5/10
 
Continuity issues aren't going to bug me much at all since I have no problem dismissing ALL of the previous films entirely and just starting from scratch here. I don't care what Singer, Vaughn or Donner say...to me it's a complete reboot. If I couldn't do that then I'd likely have a harder time enjoying the film, and I'll be damned if some studio BS is going to rob me of that.
 
This film is brilliant. After the disappointments of Last Stand and Wolverine (they were okay films just not as good as X1 and X2), First class has made going to the cinema worth it. The film has a nice runtime and at no point does the story feel rushed. Every character has a reason for being there and there are some nods to fans of the previous films
The agent Stryker in this is William Stryker's father
There is no after credits scene but X1 and X2 didn't have one so it's no big deal. I really enjoyed this film and can't wait for first class 2.
 
Saw it an loved it. Make no mistake, this is the Xavier and Magneto show. Mystique and Shaw are featured heavily and do great jobs but when X and Magneto are off screen the film is no where near as strong. Luckily this doesn't happen very often. Definitely a flawed film- a little rushed, perhaps a bit too much going on and hampered a little by the constraints of the original trilogies' continuity- but I can't imagine many people not enjoying it. I gave it a 9 because of the small faults, but I really did enjoy it a lot.
 
I expected to resort to hyperbolic praise after seeing X:FC, but to be honest, it doesn't need it. If forced to describe how I felt coming out of the theater in one word, I'd say "content." X:FC is the most comic book-like of its franchise, if not genre, doubtless because of not only Matthew Vaughn's direction, but also the time it's set in. Funny how realism is relative. Go back in time enough and even the most outlandish of ideas become perfectly acceptable in context.

Since I'm too lazy to write a proper review (impossible, anyway, as my mind is in no condition make heads or tails of this movie on account of being in pieces from awesomeness overload), I'll just list down the pros and cons as they come to mind:

Pros: Bacon, of course. He combines cheese and malice so expertly that it's an absolute riot to watch him. He's having fun with the role, and it definitely shows.

Fassbender. Those reviewers calling for him to be the next Bond weren't kidding or jumping on any bandwagon. The character might as well be Bond in the first half of the movie. As for Magneto, his transformation is brilliant, though does steal Xavier's thunder a bit.

The final battle. From beginning to end, it is gripping. Finally, here's what an X-Men final battle should be like. No character gets the shaft as has become the norm in this franchise. Not only does everyone gets to showcase their powers, but they don't do it in such a way that it doesn't somehow move the plot forward. I couldn't have been happier.

McAvoy. Consider us blessed to have nabbed two awesome actors for two awesome characters not once, but twice! McAvoy plays off Fassbender believably, and vice-versa, and their characters' friendship comes off genuine, which makes their parting all the more tragic. Xavier's character development may be overshadowed by Lehnsherr's, sure, but without one, there wouldn't be the other.

The score. I've never been one to pay close attention to film scores, usually, and this one was no different, so I was completely blown away by how well it complemented the movie. Magneto's theme in particular is mind-boggling, is all I can say, and whatever that played as soon as the credits started to roll is great as well. By the time it ended and I looked around, I found myself the only one in the theater. Their loss.

The cameos. I'm not talking about the two big names that made their brief but freakin' amazing appearances. It's the cameos of that-guy actors I have in mind. Rade Serbedzija who played that Russian General, I recognized from Snatch. Olek Krupa, the Russian captain, I know from Home Alone 3. And most of all, Michael Ironside from Starship Troopers. I also enjoy how these are not blink-and-miss cameos, but glorified ones that contribute to the plot. Kudos to the casting director and writers.

Honorable mentions: The training montage, Banshee, Beast's [BLACKOUT]first-person[/BLACKOUT] transformation, Azazel, and the alternate history. I'm sure there are more.

Cons: Emma Frost. She's more basic than fierce, and not quite Emma Frost material. Jones' acting leaves much to be desired, as does her role in the third act, [BLACKOUT]or lack thereof.[/BLACKOUT] I hope she gets a chance to shine in the sequel, if any (there better be if heads won't roll).

Angel. Her [BLACKOUT]defection[/BLACKOUT] feels off, as does Darwin's [BLACKOUT]death.[/BLACKOUT] They both feel rushed. Regardless, I don't really mind since they're low-tier characters that I couldn't care less about and their characters go in a direction that seems logical rather than pandering.

Magneto's final costume and helmet. Honestly threw me for a loop as soon as they were revealed because of how tacky they looked, especially that hook on the helmet. And so much purple. Granted, it's characteristically accurate, but it was still startling to see.

And that's it. Most of the stuff I take issue with is rather superficial, so there's that. In short, I loved it. Better than X2? Having just marathoned the first two movies, skimmed over the third, and skipped the fourth entirely, I would say X:FC falls just under X2, but that's only because X2 is that great, and it doesn't mean X:FC is any less so. Afterwards, the temptation to watch it again immediately was almost overwhelming, but I'm saving the second viewing for tomorrow. Just a great movie overall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"