Considering Snyder's track record with her I wouldn't be surprised if she was heavily involved in the investigation stuff at STAR labs that was all removed.
All the action from now on should be fought in some isolated place somewhere.
-saving ppl isn't enough, you MUST show him talking to ppl.
People weren't mad that there was action in a populated area.
How about just talking.... period? Doesn't seem like such a weird thing to ask for.
I have seen folks still complain about fighting in a populated area , so it might not bother you ( it did not bother me either), but that complain still stands.
Yes, I'm very well informed with MOS complaints.
If you really think anyone was mad that Superman fought in a populated area and nothing beyond that, then you're clearly not.
Sure thing, man. I ain't going to engage in another MOS debate. Some of my points are obviously made in a joking manner without going into detail about them complaints.
Sorry for discussing something you brought up on a discussion forum.
Find me one single person that fits your description of said complaints, and I will singlehandedly pay for your hair plugs.
Funny, I was just reading that other thread and found this:
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=36298383&postcount=8
You did say one person tho, sure as hell aint going through mos thread to show your bald Feige head some proof. There one guy. Just get me the expensive hairspray, I'd like my hair smelling good too.
You proved my point for me.Superman bringing the fight to a populated area is actually exactly what I'm complaining about![]()
Superhero movies have destructive fights in populated areas all the time and no one ever bats an eye.
MoS stands out because not only does Superman make no concerted effort to minimize destruction or casualties, but he actively goes out of the way at times to endanger more people and the film doesn't treat it like something we should think about.
Sure thing, man. I ain't going to engage in another MOS debate.
And my point is that Superman will have many baggage and nitpicks for it to be well loved, no matter who they get on the next follow up or reboot.
If it ever gets to the point of having a good Superman movie, it will be seen in the same vain as Spiderman Homecoming. Not better than the Raimi two films, but it works, never on the level of a Batman Begins or never even coming near Dark Knight, just a passable rotten tomatoes approved and financially good Superman movie, which is better than nothing or to some (better than what we have seen before), but just there and nothing more for the Superman fandom.

Sure, which is why I brought up Homecoming. Not better than the original, but just good enough. Better than nothing.
Yeah I don't get how something akin to a Homecoming is some sort of low bar. While I personally still rank the Raimi films a tier higher, it's unquestionably a big hit for fans and audiences alike. And there's quite a bit of the fanbase who feel this has been the closest to the feel of the books yet, which is great for them.If we get anything resembling homecoming in terms of quality then I'd be a very happy bald camper since I think homecoming is by far the best out of all of the spidey movies and this is coming from a spidy fan.