The Dark Knight How awesome was Two-Face's face?

I thought he looked great! I couldn't stop watching his teeth through his face as he talked, but I think they really did a lot for keeping it PG-13.
 
I think Two Face looks amazing...
and as for the guy that said BF's Two Face was better...Im kinda speechless as to why you said that
 
Why didn't the acid origin work? What was unrealistic about that?

And this time, Maroni didn't even have something to do with it. Yet still, he's in the ****ing movie.
 
Why didn't the acid origin work? What was unrealistic about that?

And this time, Maroni didn't even have something to do with it. Yet still, he's in the ****ing movie.
Well its not that its unrealistic but I mean... who throws acid in peoples faces anyway? :huh: Thats kind of out of the ordinary IMO
 
Well its not that its unrealistic but I mean... who throws acid in peoples faces anyway? :huh: Thats kind of out of the ordinary IMO

See one page back, exactly - where I posted several pictures of acid scarred victims from Africa and other places, as well as this post, where I posted a video of an acid attack victim who describes in vivid detail how her nostrils and ears were burnt off.
 
He looked so hideous, I thought his whiskey was going to leak from his throat.
 
I didn't like it. It was so unrealistic it took me out of the film.
 
I didn't like it. It was so unrealistic it took me out of the film.


...how? People have lived with far worse third degree burns on their faces. I can post more pics, if you'd like.
 
...how? People have lived with far worse third degree burns on their faces. I can post more pics, if you'd like.

No thanks I'm good.

Just saying, the way his face was, his eye would have been dried out completely considering he had no lids. The entire thing was just unbelievable.
 
No thanks I'm good.

Just saying, the way his face was, his eye would have been dried out completely considering he had no lids. The entire thing was just unbelievable.


Not to mention the fact that it would be impossible for him to swivel his eye around with all the orbital muscles missing, as they were.
 
No thanks I'm good.

Just saying, the way his face was, his eye would have been dried out completely considering he had no lids. The entire thing was just unbelievable.

It takes at least three days for an eye to dry out, and the entirety of the Two Face portion of his saga really only seemed to have taken about two days, maybe less, but probably more (I'd have to see it again) - as far as why it didn't dry out beforehand, that was what the rag on his face was for; moisture and all that.
 
Ah, just for giggles. For the sake of your stomach, wait thirty minutes before looking at this.

faceburn1xc4.jpg


It's not as bad, but Jesus Christ bananas.
 
I wish them had just set him up for 3 instead of wasting him for the last 30 mins of TDK.
 
Why didn't the acid origin work? What was unrealistic about that?

And this time, Maroni didn't even have something to do with it. Yet still, he's in the ****ing movie.

It amazes me that there are people who always want to see the same origins of supervillains like Two Face and The Joker. Many comics showed the acid origin of Two Face and even more comics (and a movie ofcourse) show how the Joker was created. It's so uninspired to always do the same things. If a guy would have fallen into a vat of acid and turned into the Joker in The Dark Knight, I swear, I would have walked out. I'm so glad the Nolan Brothers and Goyer chose to keep The Joker ambigious and to show a different Two Face origin. Very creative. I mean, the Maroni/acid origin, yeah, it's very cool, but it has been done many times before. I love new origins and new characterizations like in the Dark Knight, one of the many many reasons I enjoyed the movie so much.

And Maroni being in it, is more a slight nod to the comics I think. Like Loeb and Flass in Batman Begins.
 
Yeah, that's how BAD Two Face was in this movie.

Bear in mind I am ONLY talking about his FACE here. The performance and character itself blows all others out of the water.



This is a Franchise that is priding itself on realism and making more "believable" characters. Two Face felt off from that "realism" (in his LOOK only). I mean that is NOT how your face would look like if it got burned. It simply isn't.

So it doesn't bother you that Schumacher made him into Joker-lite? Your Batman fandom should be revoked.
 
Yeah, that's how BAD Two Face was in this movie.

Bear in mind I am ONLY talking about his FACE here. The performance and character itself blows all others out of the water.



This is a Franchise that is priding itself on realism and making more "believable" characters. Two Face felt off from that "realism" (in his LOOK only). I mean that is NOT how your face would look like if it got burned. It simply isn't.

See my post recent post. :o
 
Embarrassingly bad. I was sure the "leaked" photo of Two Face a few months ago was either fan-made or an early rough. I was amazed to see it actually used in the film! It was like something out of a 1960's Vincent Price movie (which I love by the way), but this is 2008 and VP is departed (RIP). Nolan should have gone with a severely burned look with the left eye obscured with melted skin. Harvey's transformation was totally unbelievable as well. A complete waste of a classic character.
 
I thought Two-Face was perfect. I loved watching his CGI eye react the same as his real eye (e.g. when he's talking to the Joker it slowly becomes redder, and welled up, like his real eye.)
 
THANK GOD Two-Face was done this way, if only to shake the stupid notion that everything in these movies has to be uber-realistic.

Having a guy walking around THAT f'd up seems to open the door to much more interesting future possibilities.

To those who think Two-Face should've looked like little more than Mel Gibson's Man Without a Face, you (as Aaron Eckhart said) are just not thinking big enough. The point of Two-Face is that his disfigurement is absolutely the most horrifying thing you've ever seen, something that no sane man could live with. It can't be like anything you've seen in real life. It has to be much, much more extreme. Nolan understood this.
 
THANK GOD Two-Face was done this way, if only to shake the stupid notion that everything in these movies has to be uber-realistic.

Having a guy walking around THAT f'd up seems to open the door to much more interesting future possibilities.

To those who think Two-Face should've looked like little more than Mel Gibson's Man Without a Face, you (as Aaron Eckhart said) are just not thinking big enough. The point of Two-Face is that his disfigurement is absolutely the most horrifying thing you've ever seen, something that no sane man could live with. It can't be like anything you've seen in real life. It has to be much, much more extreme. Nolan understood this.

Actually, Nolan stated numerous times that if he really wanted to make it 'uber-realistic,' it'd be a lot worse. I can agree, and need only to point to my prior post.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"