Wrong.....dude. Can you look at the Mona Lisa and suppose that the paints just jumped on the canvas into the complex work of art we see today? Can you look at a building and not think that there was mind and hands that put it together in a functioning way?? That my friend, stretches credulity. The balance in nature, the human eye, the human body....the universe. Order cannot come from choas unless a mind is reeling in the choas and setting it in order.
*sigh* Sorry, but just because it makes sense to you does not make it a fact. Creationism is just as much a theory as Evolution...maybe more so. Until you can prove anything (i.e. God's existence) then that's all it will ever be. And unfortunately, unless we build a time machine we probably won't have answers to either until we die.
Please stop comparing the complexity/design of living, biological forms to that of inanimate objects. It's illogical and does nothing to help your argument. It's apples to oranges. In fact, it's not even Apples to Oranges....it's Apples to Tennis Balls.
As for the great complexity of human design...take a look at this page regarding the human eye and it's many imperfections. Hardly a perfect design, and more "likely" the result of an imperfect evolution and cumulative natural selection:
http://www.2think.org/eye.shtml
Science and religion don't oppose each other. Let me ask you this: "Even if creation is just a random bunch of biochemical processess to you, where does the soul come from? Thoughts? Emotion? A sense of morality?? Right & Wrong???
While I do believe in evolution, I'm not opposed to the idea that a supreme intelligence may have started the process. I'll even go as far as to say that it might have guided it at some points. That doesn't discount evolution though. Science and religion can go hand in hand if you have an open mind. Now, do I believe that this intelligence is the God from the Bible...No. But that's a whole other discussion.
Where does the soul come from? Thoughts? Morality? I don't think anyone can truly answer these questions. But what is the soul? Can you define it? What is sentience? Do Animals have souls? Plants? Are they sentient? So many questions that have to be answered to figure all that out. One could argue that all those things are created by the brain...over time through thousands of years of socialization. But I'm not a theologist...No where near qualified to really dive into this subject.
The Bible wasn't written to show bio-diversity. But it does account for God creating mant different types of life.....animal and plant. It's not a text book. It was written for the purpose of showing man
1. Who God is.
2. What man's condition is.
3. To show man how to fix his condition thru a relationship with His Son.
The most important thing you said in that last section was that "it's not a text book." Correct. It's not....it's a story...a fairy tail...mythology. Sure, there are some verifiable facts such as existing locations and events, but that doesn't prove it's all true. Amazing Spider-Man #36 takes place in New York...in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Real place, real event...but doesn't make anything else in the book true. It's not a text book, and it shouldn't be used as such. If the only proof you have is what's written in the bible then you have no proof at all. Evolution is not a complete theory...that's why it's called a "theory." We haven't found the missing link, we may never find it. But there are mounds of other evidence that still points in the direction of evolution. And we will continue to look for the answers through evolution as it is the most logical scientific theory we have right now...as we understand things. As time goes by we may gain a new understanding of how things work...evolution may get tossed for a totally different theory. Only time will tell, and only through scientific research and discovery will that ever be possible.
The only other thing I wanted to touch on was the statement "If we evolved from apes/monkeys then why are apes/monkeys still around??" This is a huge misunderstanding of the "we evolved from apes" statement. We DID NOT evolve from Apes, or monkeys, or chimps. We evolved from a common ancestor....yes. All primates evolved from a central starting point...maybe even points. The evolutionary tree is more like a bush. Not one big trunk with a few branches sticking out...but a whole jumble of branches starting real close to the ground going in all directions. Sure there is a central root, starting point...but it's much more complex. Each of those branches are different...some short representing species that failed to adapt and died out, some real long with branches of their own. Those branches being long or short depending on how that species faired. We didn't evolve from apes/monkeys...but, to some extent, along side them. Variations in weather, mating, predators, food, landscape, mutations shaped each individual species into what they are. That being said, this is not necessarily the only view on evolution and the "evolutionary tree." It just happens to be the one that makes the most sense to me. Please don't take it as the end-all-be-all.