Exactly right..
I have no problems with movies being campy, or totally out of whack or illogical so long as that's their premise.. but when they try to sell something as 'realistic' then do a 180 on it, that's when i think many people have a problem with it..
Take Fast 6 for instance.. people were flying around like superman.. it's just absolutely ridiculous.. but then they never tried to be realistic to begin with.. so, we go in for the pure entertainment value...
But after that have been said, i think it's near impossible to write a movie or even book with zero inconsistencies (asimov does the best job of it)... so, a little forgiveness is given here and there... and what bothers some may not bother others.. like the disguise bothers me because i think if they tried a bit harder they could have come up with a better idea, but then it's not going to ruin the show for me..
Right, the key word you have there is "premise"..
In the old Superman, the reaction to seeing a flying man is to just compliment his suit.
In the new Superman, a flying man shows up and tanks get pointed at him.
I'm thinking a secret identity definitely needs to be handled differently in these 2 situations

And I agree, inconsistencies won't ruin it for me....but I'm nerdy like that, I like things to make sense lol.
Last edited:


