How Tall Should the HULK Be?

DACMAN

The Spidey Fan
Joined
May 27, 2001
Messages
11,274
Reaction score
1
Points
31
I've seen alot of disagreement on this. What does the majority say?
 
In order for Hulk to be muscular without looking silly, he's gonna have to be in the 9-10 ft range
 
CaptainStacy said:
7 to 8 ft., just like in the comics.
But he's actually drawn to be 9-12 feet tall in the comics.
 
7 to 8 feet,anything over 8 feet and the moviegoers will hate the movie.There expecting to see a superhero,not Godzilla.
 
I think the ideal would be the same size as the first transformation(8feet). You should of made the poll public so we can see who votes what. :)
 
Around 10-11 feet would be good I think. 8 feet would a little small.
 
Ions said:
I think the ideal would be the same size as the first transformation(8feet). You should of made the poll public so we can see who votes what. :)
What does that matter?
 
I still don't mind him growing a bit when he gets angrier...but if not 9-10 ft is perfect. 8ft is too small considering how wide and strong he's gonna look. 8ft would look short IMO for this film.
 
Anything over 8 foot,and your looking at another Godzilla type movie that moviegoers will hate.
 
^If the Hulk is too tall it will make people look like ants,so yeah:yay:
 
^ So 8ft works but 9ft makes people look like ants? How big are ants in your neighborhood? LOL
 
I think the hulk should be as big as he needs to be in order to perform various feats of strength.

his original size was fine in the movie, it just that at both times when he was interacting with humans, he grew further because he was angry and it then made him look too big.


The thing is if you want to be big enough to carry off swinging a tank like a toy, you can't be the same human esque size, heck you'd find it hard to even reach the turret. The thing is that artists in comics have been misrepresenting the dimensions of large vehicles and tanks for years in order to fit around the character. In a film you have to do the opposite. :o

I am partial to the morphing size hulk considering he morphs size initially, it works in my eyes.

so as a guide, the hulk should be big enough to perform his largest strength feat and no more. What ever that is, i have no idea

:dry:
 
DACMAN said:
I think 9 is perfect.

My sentiments exactly. Just like the first transformation in the first film. He was then 12 feet for the Hulk-dog scene (too big!) and grew to 15' in the tunnel just before Talbot offs himself (waaaayy too big!!). I think between 8.5' to 9' would be perfect! And pray that they keep the same physical look from the first film!
 
Ions said:
I think the ideal would be the same size as the first transformation(8feet). You :)

Hey. Ions. We agree on something. What do know :woot:
 
Cracker Jack said:
Hey. Ions. We agree on something. What do know :woot:
:D Yeah, well we agreed on this issue last time it came up. We agree sometimes. :)
 
7' to 8'.It would really make him seem even stronger if he were to pick up tanks and other large heavy objects at that size...
 
Spider - Man said:
My sentiments exactly. Just like the first transformation in the first film. He was then 12 feet for the Hulk-dog scene (too big!) and grew to 15' in the tunnel just before Talbot offs himself (waaaayy too big!!). I think between 8.5' to 9' would be perfect! And

I loved the first film but I hope he's more monsterous this time around and I also hope some of his features are more exagerated...less proportional.

Fly casual...but don't look like your trying to fly casual.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"