This, This, This.
For most of the GA, their idea of a character is entirely wrapped up in how they appear in other media. Of course the GA loves Wolverine more than the others: Fox purposely made Wolverine the dominant figure from the start. They give him the cool one liners, someone elses love interest as his main one, and a pretty boy lead for people to pine over/want to be.
The GA dosen't know that Cyclops is a much bigger badass in the comics, one that wouldn't put up with Logan stealing his vechicles.
The GA dosen't know that Rogue is a feisty southern belle who can actually kick ass.
The GA dosen't know that Storm is a warrior, not a character with a shifting personality with an average performance from Halle Berry.
There's more examples, but basically Fox hasnt scratched the surface with these characters, mainly because all they care about is Logan for the most part.
:what do Avengers have to do with the point we were discussing on previous comments?
![]()

what do Avengers have to do with the point we were discussing on previous comments?
![]()
maybe because I like to share my opinions too, like the rest of the users are doing these latest days, and curiously, its the same opinion as mine.
And why do I keep getting the feeling all these months that you have a problem with me?
Am I breaking any rule or its just a personal issue from you?

I'm perfectly fine with Jean and Logan having a mutual attraction to one another, and with that resulting in some tension/dramz in the mansion. But the fact is, they barely spent any time together. Sorry, I'm not sold that she is the love of his life and that his heart is crushed by her death.




Their relationship was merely UST, not enough to destroy Wolverine.I was pointing out the fact some here are expectin X-Men films to perfectly
match the comics but expect no such things from Disney/MS,Spider-man films,
Dark Knight trilogy,and Man of steel and prasies them.
causing problems?
well, I was just trying to have some order, and since we can create other topics, I dont see how is wrong to suggest other users to create a topic for that issue, specially if its Hugh Jackman/Wolverine, an issue that creates so much discussion.
Is that to cause problems?
If so, then I dont know how should be called people repeating the same opinios about certain issues to ALL the users, on all the topics, something that could be called as being "a troll"
But at least I havent told this to any administrator or moderator, since I have accepted the attitude of those users/user.
And if someone has had a problem with a previous comment of mine, they can tell me about it personally, by pm, same as you.
But for some reason, neither they or you have contacted to me by pm, a more private and direct way to resolve things.
But for some reason, you preffer to post it on the topics, when maybe I could not read them sometimes.
There is a list or rules, and I think I havent broken any, and I feel like many users would agree with me on this one.
So if one day, I break a rule, feel free to tell me by pm and I will apologize and wont do it again.
But as of now, I have only expressed my opinion. If some fans dont like my opinion or suggestion sometimes, its how it is, just my opinion. So there is no reason to call it "a problem" or saying Im causing problems. Thats totally out of context and unfair, to say the least.
Anyone think Yukio's line in The Wolverine "I saw you die" will foreshadow DOFP?
Anyone think Yukio's line in The Wolverine "I saw you die" will foreshadow DOFP?
I never praised it being that i dont like the Avengers to began with. If I have a favorite character(s) that i grew up with and saw a certain way there is absolutelty nothing wrong with wanting to see them in the majority of the likeness that the comic book is,not completely but mostly being that it was the reason I loved the character in the first place.When will people get films are different than comics.
Let's compare comics the Avengers,and since they called It the avengers and
not ultimates the 616 will be used for this compassion,
The Avengers come together on own yet GA only knows Shield has to gather
each one
The GA only knows it takes death of coulson to get Avengers to go after Loki
The GA thinks Iron Man Is leading Avenger not Captain America like In Comics
The GA thinks Tony Stark hangs around the avengers outside armor
The GA thinks Black Widow and Hawkeye as shield agents
The GA thinks Hulk Is key Avenger
The GA thinks Bruce Banner Is kep part of Avengers
The GA thinks Nick Fury Is black
People are again playing this game when they praise all other comic book films that have massive changes but complain about X-Men doing the same.
MS films have changes as do the spider-man films and Batman and superman films Chris Nolan Is involved In.
We should be hoping for a decent and good adaptian true to spirit and we can see some things from comics but not expecting direct translation.And If your going to be demanding a direct translation you need to apply that to all and not just X-Men.
This, This, This.
For most of the GA, their idea of a character is entirely wrapped up in how they appear in other media. Of course the GA loves Wolverine more than the others: Fox purposely made Wolverine the dominant figure from the start. They give him the cool one liners, someone elses love interest as his main one, and a pretty boy lead for people to pine over/want to be.
The GA dosen't know that Cyclops is a much bigger badass in the comics, one that wouldn't put up with Logan stealing his vechicles.
The GA dosen't know that Rogue is a feisty southern belle who can actually kick ass.
The GA dosen't know that Storm is a warrior, not a character with a shifting personality with an average performance from Halle Berry.
There's more examples, but basically Fox hasnt scratched the surface with these characters, mainly because all they care about is Logan for the most part.

I was pointing out the fact some here are expectin X-Men films to perfectly
match the comics but expect no such things from Disney/MS,Spider-man films,
Dark Knight trilogy,and Man of steel and prasies them.
I knew full well Avengers was mismatch between 616 and ultimates.So was
Amazing Spider-man.That alone shows It's not perfect adaptan of eather 616
or ultimates.And film Is called Marvel's avengers not the Ultimates.The point
was never about matchup If others complain GA doesn't know things from X-Men
comics It can easily be pointed out GA don't know things on real Avengers
eather.And point can be made about nearly every comic adaptian.
Wolverine was most popular X-Man long before Hugh jackman played him.I know
some want to ignore that but it's true.
There are 2 things I have hated with marvel comics
1:Changes that came from Grant morrison's run on new X-Men
2:Ultimate line
Complaning about faithlness Is losing battle with various historys of characters.with marvel you have 2.with Superman and batman you got tons with DC's consent changing of historys and various earths.
Some are wanting X-Men be held to stranded they don't hold other superhero films to.
Days of future past could be swan song for Magneto In series If speculation by some of next film after DOFP taking place In corrected future prove right.Bryan Singer's response to Apocalpse could be hint that will be future X-Men villain.
As for Xavier I think there Is some chance of him remaining.Especilly with him In wheelchair.
I remain convinced for days of future past wolverine will be very Important character but It will not be a last Stand situation.Hugh Jackman going back and forth between New York and Montreal sometimes being away during a week says he won't be In every scene.
Days of future past could be swan song for Magneto In series If speculation by some of next film after DOFP taking place In corrected future prove right.Bryan Singer's response to Apocalpse could be hint that will be future X-Men villain.