RedIsNotBlue
Agree to disagree
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2004
- Messages
- 21,982
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Is that even online? I haven't seen it.
hunter rider said:Its from the preview of the new Kong trailer

Herr Logan said:As much as I'm disgusted with what they've done with movie Doom (as well as the plebeians that continue to childishly defend that decision), very little in this world could be worse than what you just wrote about the bat.
![]()
Herr Logan said:Preview of the trailer? A preview of the God damn trailer?? What in God's green Hell has the movie marketing industry come to??!
Time was, a preview and a trailer were the same thing, and you'd see it right after the newsreel finished at the local cinema. Then you'd hide under your seats in case the Germans were a-comin' in their planes overhead...
![]()
RedIsNotBlue said:Is that even online? I haven't seen it.
RedIsNotBlue said:The only childish one I see around here is you making insults as if your higher above people who have a different opinion than you.

hunter rider said:you can D/l the ten second clips here
http://s37.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0RIMQKRHHZVTR1TCCZXRUGAXGL
http://s37.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3OV0O3TPSX44U338B84A3BMOXA
Herr Logan said:...
*exasperated choking sound*
If you paid any attention to what I've been saying during my more drawn-out rants on these boards, you'd see this isn't a matter of just "differing opinions," but the specific content of those opinions.
Good lord... I mean, even if it was while insulting me that you actually said something that wasn't shallow, trite and meaningless, that would be progress. It's like you're like a talking wind-up toy manufactured by Marvel Enterprises. I mean, it doesn't take much to make me depressed, but you're killin' me here.
![]()
hunter rider said:lol My friend you are on fine form today![]()
![]()
its the advert from one of the TV networks promoting the debut of the trailer on their channel this monday

Herr Logan said:Thank ye kindly, Hunter.
Seriously, doesn't it seem ridiculous that we actually have previews for previews? What kind of audience is salivating at a pre-preview that they would even release something like that??
I don't know whether to be happy that other people's lives are apparently as empty as mine feels much of the time, or just even more disillusioned.
![]()
hunter rider said:I shall clarify,Herr doesnt have a problem with ppl liking movie Doom or accepting hi,he just gets pissed when ppl try to claim that the changes arent there and that there wasnt another feasible way to do it more faith fully
Right Herr ??

RedIsNotBlue said:As much as I'm disgusted with what they've done with movie Doom (as well as the plebeians that continue to childishly defend that decision)
That is an insult towards me...sorry.

RedIsNotBlue said:Oh my god. This getting frustrating repeating myself. I will write it all in caps this time to make it clearer. I NEVER SAID THAT CHANGES ARENT THERE. I HAVE CLEARLY SAID THAT I HAVE EMBRACED THE CHANGES AND I FEEL THAT MOVIE DOOM IS BETTER ON SCREEN THAN THE COMIC DOOM COULD HAVE BEEN. AND OF COURSE THERE COULD HAVE BEEN A MORE FAITHFUL DOOM AND I BELEIVE THE MORE FAITHFUL THEY WOULD HAVE MADE HIM IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CHEESIER AND HARDER TO ACCEPT.
Okay...I hope thats clear now.![]()

Dragon said:I'm saying WE here at SHH who are having this discussion. And again the general public didn't know where things were gong with the Star Wars films. Neither did most know where things were going with LOTR. Yet the films were well made enough to keep people coming back. so the studio can "appeal' to them merely by making excellent films.
Dragon said:Any first movie is used to set up a firm foundation. So some conflict should be resolved in one movie, leaving some other things open for later development. I'm not saying all things get resolved, but some certainly must for it to be a complete film.
And they are. they learn top use their powers and function as a team. we know they're heroes and they stop Doom's first scheme.
Dragon said:No it isn't. The group has been who it is whether Reed & Sue were together or not. There was even a point when Sue left the team, separating from Reed and the team continued. Reed and sue love each other, that's for certain and should be established. i'm just saying that they don't have to be getting married, or planning to be married or ven proposing by the end of the first film. Not if this screentime can be devoted to telling a compelling story like Doom's origin.
Dragon said:Their marriage and having Franklin doesn't reflect character development. Those are subplots.
Dragon said:It has to be a good film to have any "guarantee" of success. Doom being established as a powerful villain with strong back story isn't something that would appeal exclusively to comic book fans. The FF and Doom having a strong rivalry isn't either. And certainly the general audience wants a dramatic final confrontation. Show me the movie audience that says they want a simplistic and watered down villain.
hunter rider said:here see if this cheers you up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
RedIsNotBlue said:As much as I'm disgusted with what they've done with movie Doom (as well as the plebeians that continue to childishly defend that decision)
That is an insult towards me...sorry.
hunter rider said:I shall clarify,Herr doesnt have a problem with ppl liking movie Doom or accepting hi,he just gets pissed when ppl try to claim that the changes arent there and that there wasnt another feasible way to do it more faith fully
Right Herr ??

hunter rider said:I think on this occasion it is all buissness,the Channels are trying to draw aduiences with the debut of the full 2.30 min trailer or on Monday
If it makes you feel any better i was quite giddy over those 10 second clips![]()
![]()


Herr Logan said:Well... they are pretty damn cool, I admit.
I just hate the principal of the thing, you know?
![]()

JMAfan said:Yeah thats his usual one....but don't take it so personally....he's pretty much used that one on all of us...except the fact that he didn't put sheep in that one....hmmmmm....he might not be himself today.....![]()

Herr Logan said:It was a semi-good day. My fiancee and I applied for a new apartment and I'm pretty sure I've secured that crappy retail job I've been trying to get.
![]()

TheSaintofKillers said:Haven't read the whole thread, but, having read the novel, and being a big Doom fan, I can assure you they sure as **** didn't get it.
Doom is not Doom, and not just in name. In personality also. There is so little of Doom in there, it's depressing. I've discussed this so many times i've lost count. If people think he's faithful, then they don't know enough about him. Heck, if they think he's better, then they better go and read some of the great comics with Doom to see why their opinion might change pretty fast on the matter. Doom is not just a great villain, he's by and FAR the greatest villain.
Here's the old review I made about how Doom was portrayed in the book, since I have no envy to repeat myself, other than by quoting myself, of course:
Now, I had lost all hopes nearly a year ago. Having read the Frost script (which, btw, is nearly THE exact same as the newest movie, nearly nothing has changed), I was heavily disappointed by how Doom acted, his origin, and his powers. But, Lightning Strikez! gave me hopes. He's always been great doing so (and he should always continue to ) by providing us exemples as to why Doom from the movie wouldn't be THAT far away. Unfortunately, the exemples he gave were all that made Doom remotely close to his comic self.
Victor is madly in love with Sue, even if he often tries to deny it. Sure, when he goes ga-ga crazy, he begins to totally hate her, but that's something else (since he's crazy). The thing here, is that Victor, before his "accident" isn't Doom at all. Doom should always be Doom, even before his accident.
Here, he isn't. He's a ruthless businessman, who fought to be where he is, but that... isn't even CLOSE to Doom's dreams. He should see far much further than he does. When he goes crazy, he makes a reference to Leonard (his kind of secretary) about how he should think bigger. But, never (aside from here) does he ever even ATTEMP to show us (or try) to want something global, other than money and "more electricity".
Another thing. Since Doom was always Doom in the comics, he didn't think much bigger when he had his accident. He already wanted more. Here, we are led to believe that he was "human" before, but after his accident, someone acting like Doom can only be "crazy". That's what he is in the movie. A crazy metal dude. He's not a true "God among manking", he's a freak of nature that goes on a rampage, a lot like Electro himself often do. He's just NOT Doom. Thinking about it, his situation is simular to that of Norman Osborn in the first spiderman movie. Both got crazy after their accident, explaining why they were "eviiiIIiiil", which is lame, imo, since Doom was always much more than just evil. But here, that's all he is when he become "Doctor Doom"... (just the fact that he become Doctor Doom is horrible, since he should always have been himself).
And worse, much worse than all of that, he's not even HALF the scientific mind Richard his. What made Doom SUCH A GREAT villain (or heck, more than a villain) was his intellect. Here, sure, he's intelligent, manipulative, but so much less than Reed. Doom being anything less than Reed's equal (much less not even half his genius) is absolutely atrocious. Heck, Doom never does anything by himself. He always hired scientist and doctors to make his discoveries. There's even a scene (showed in the trailer), when he has to go to a doctor to know what is happening to him. MY GOD. We are talking about DOOM here. He would NEVER ask someone's else opinion, much less about his condition, when he himself could analyse it much better (alas, not here, though). For he is suppose to be DOOM. And DOOM is above all.
At the end, when he loses and become a living statue, the writers had the golden possibility to have Doom cry a last "RiiiIIIIIiiiichard". I mean, when I got there, I though it was the PERFECT PLACE. But no, instead he seems to cry a "noooooOOooooooooo" (and by all that is in the bottom of my holy rectum, I hope it's not as horrible as the one Vader cries at the end of ROTS).
I could have forgiven his relation to Sue, his mutant powers, but NOT what made him superior to all villains, his INTELLECT. That, imo, is a change I cannot forgive, which is stupid, and makes me cringe just thinking about it.
But that's not all. I won't go into his powers, and all, since we've all discussed that dozen of times here, but I want to address the Sue/Victor relationship.
It's a mess, imo. Lightning said that Doom never truly cared about Sue. Having read the book, i'd say he was wrong (sorry). Doom cared about Sue, a lot, even if he seems to want to not accept it. When she goes in Reed's arms, he is hurted a lot. But, all this really does is make Sue a bad character, imo. Really, she goes out two years with Victor. She probably fell "something" for him, for godsake. Two years. And yet, the instant Reed comes back, she runs in his arms. That, no problem here. She loved the dude even more than the old doctor. It's understandable. But, once Reed was back, she stopped caring about Victor. She didn't even noticed he existed anymore. I mean, when everything goes wrong for him, she doesn't even think about him. He could have died she wouldn't even have cared. That makes her something much closer to a bad girl (villain here) than a hero, imo. Victor goes crazy, and that's in part due to how she left him, and pull a finger on him, without no other reason than that she loved another man more. She completely left him, without even truly telling him how she truly felt about all of this. When he becomes a statue, at the very end, she's all too happy to be "discarded" of her ex-boyfriend, like some mean 16 years old adolescent on a rampage.
That's a pretty bad reason, imo. Exactly the kind of person I could never respect. That's the kind of character i'm going to root for in theatre ? Sure, i wanted the FF to win when I read the book, but not Sue. Victor could have fried her i'd have been relieved. Here's hoping Jessica Alba's so good she'll make me think otherwise.
So, Sue's a pretty messed up character here , and Doom's one of the worst adaptation possible of the greatest villain there is.
But, imo, movie Doom is still a great villain. He's easily, just after Magneto, the second best superhero movie villain. Easily. If he had been faithful, he would have took the first place without any difficulty, but oh well. A 10% faithful Doom is still better than most villains.
All in all, a month or two after writing that, when I rethink about it, I only have disgust about that awful adaptation. It's up there with CINO.
Bleh, I hate fox and marvel. Destroying the best villain there is.
If you people want to understand why Doom's such a great villain, unlike his movie counterpart, go read Secret war, or the Doom 2099 by Warren Ellis, or the three part storyarc by Chuck Dixon named "DOOM". I'd recommend those to the ones who don't know him much. Then, well, there is so much more.![]()
