I'd say it's a lock for his return. But Melina will have to stay at home.
The former, they want to see old Ronald McDonald kick his vegan ass.When you say "hate" do you mean they hate him enough to want to see him get his a** kicked or do they hate him to the point they just change the channel when he's on?
If its the former then he might be doing his job perfectly...which is great. So many people want to be the cool heel now so its nice to see Bryan buck that trend.
The former, they want to see old Ronald McDonald kick his vegan ass.
Still pissed he wasn't the one to tag team with God.
That could be a good idea. Kinda' like when Rock finally got the strap of Triple H at Backlash back in 2000. It built up so much, that the crowd went absolutely crazy when Triple H finally lost the title.![]()
I'm not completely against the idea, but I do wonder if this Bryan proposed never-ending reign is stemming more form what his fan consensus want to see with him in the spotlight rather than what may the be best idea all round for the company and business as a whole.
Possible predjudice and bias issues aside though, I can see the potential of the idea, and would be willing to give it a chance.
I'm really liking this idea, but I don't have the faith in WWE creative to see this and play it out like so. They'd probably make it the first match of the night at the May PPV, in turn saving the main event slot for another John Cena squash-fest.Exactly.Sheamus chase has been very short and to me these two could really build the belt change match up to fever pitch, which long term makes Sheamus win more memorable and gets his title reign off to a strong start.
I agree, and this is what I am concerned about too.I'm a big Bryan fan but I think any longer than Summerslam and you risk turning his good heat into the old X Pac heat.
I'm really liking this idea, but I don't have the faith in WWE creative to see this and play it out like so. They'd probably make it the first match of the night at the May PPV, in turn saving the main event slot for another John Cena squash-fest.![]()
I agree, and this is what I am concerned about too.
What a rare sight that has become...Randy smiling..
Lillian is Fiiiiine though!![]()
They're fools, so of course they'd resign him in a heartbeat.
- WWE Superstar and WrestleMania 28 headliner The Rock recently spoke to AP writer Dan Gelston about the possibility of facing former WWE Superstar and UFC champion Brock Lesnar in the main event of next year's WrestleMania.
"I'm not saying a thing," Rock said with a smirk and a raised eyebrow. "I didn't say anything."
Well, since I neither own the company nor have stock in it, I say fu** "What's good for business". I'm cheering the guy that I like best.
Nell, I have to comment on something you said:
I agree to an extent, but both go hand in hand. And you know this. It gets boring sometimes when the same person always wins. Heck, you even complained about Cena always winning at one point. Putting new guys over is important to putting on a good show and keeping main-event scene fresh.
Perfect example: back in 2000, in main-event scene was Rock, Triple H, and Undertaker. Foley had just retired, and it was pretty much Rock and Triple H feuding, with Undertaker returning. While Rock/HHH is a good feud, they needed to inject new life into the scene, leading to the inclusion of Angle, Benoit, and Jericho.
It's important especially when you have guys that are on the brink and just need more solidifying. That's why despite how much I'm anticipating CM Punk vs Jericho at Mania, I still wish it was CM Punk vs Triple H. I won't argue that Jericho/Punk would be better in-ring wise, but Triple H is higher up on the ladder and considered an icon. A win over him would really put Punk over as the Man. As someone said, the only person who's really done that for Punk at this point is Cena. Back in 1998, Austin went over HBK, then over Foley in a multi-month feud, then Kane, and then the Undertaker. Going over is very important in putting on a good show.
As for Miz, he has come a long way. But like many said, he shouldn't have been main-eventing Mania. Part of that has to do with the fact that Cena was beefing with Rock at the time, and Miz looked like a mortal standing next to titans in that ordeal. The third wheel indeed. Second, I thought his WWE title run was booked poorly. He didn't really get a credible win. I mean, retired Jerry Lawler nearly beat him in a ladder match for goodness sakes.
Strange and surprising, Daniel Bryan's world title run has been booked better, and he actually has a credible win in defeating Mark Henry and Big Show in a steel cage match at the Royal Rumble. I don't know if Creative is finally getting how to book sniveling heels, or some political maneuvering by HBK to protect his former protege, but it's been a solid run.
Anyway, I'm finished. Carry on....![]()
Lillian Garcia continues to look better with age. Amazing. Vince and HHH have been staring at naked roided up dudes too long if they think she's ugly.
Finishing off the Rocks new dvd.
"Bah GAWD! Rock and Taker just went thorough the tag champs like X-Lax through a widowed woman!"![]()
What the hell does that even MEAN, Jim Ross?????Whats the significance of her being a widow?
.