I Am The Knight
Voilá!
- Joined
- May 10, 2005
- Messages
- 24,907
- Reaction score
- 3,613
- Points
- 103
It was Ang's film, and Ang's film alone that killed TIH.
No, it was beauty killed the beast

It was Ang's film, and Ang's film alone that killed TIH.
The reality is... your clueless if you think marketing had nothing to do with this films failure... completely clueless... I don't know what else to tell ya... it was a good conversation though.
^The marketing was the main reason TIH did so poorly IMO, the marketing was simply terrible.
In what way may I ask and do you speak for everyone including Hulk and non Hulk fans alike?
I could ask the same question to you.
Just stop discarding reasons that are said by members about why the film underperformed.
As Jamon said, the marketing is a big factor to why the film underperformed along with other factors but the marketing was very poor with this film and Hulk fan or no Hulk fan, everyone agrees on this. Just think about it, TIH had an opening of $58million without much marketing, it all starting properly one month before release. Now say if the film was marketed properly, that it started early this film would have opened huge. Maybe about $70-90million in my opinion.
If you look at it from the opposite side, TDK had advertising up the wazoo for months prior to release, then went on to be huge.
What? Link?Pretty upsetting they would not follow through with a sequel.
I saw it again today, and it is a pretty good and entertaining movie. Pretty upsetting they would not follow through with a sequel.
The marketing of this movie was very very poor. My brother and friends were there the day Iron Man opened, but had no idea there was a Hulk movie in the theatres. Marvel dropped the ball on this one because the actual content of the movie was good.
Either way its a shame since the more I think about this movie the more I like it. I really look forward to the DVD an hope that DVD sales an rental will help enough for it to get a sequel once The Avengers is over with
Is it really Marvel that dropped the ball? The way I understand it Marvel was in charge of producing the movie, or as you put it the actual content and Universal was in charge of the marketing.
“Here’s the thing — it is all in the planning stages, but certainly if you look back to any number of ‘Hulk’ comics, or ‘Avengers’ comics, or ‘The Ultimates’ comics or the ‘Ultimate Avengers’ DVD that we released, it certainly makes a hell of a sequence,” Feige said of a possible Hulk vs. Avengers battle, one which Leterrier set up perfectly with the end of his film with the scene depicting Tony Stark counseling a defeated General Ross.
In fact, Leterrier went so far as to call that shot the first scene of “The Avengers” when we chatted in June. For a number of reasons I detailed earlier, actually, it just makes TOO much sense — it wouldn’t necessarily require Norton (just a lot of CGI), it would be a viable threat to the already assembled group (which wouldn’t require an additional villain’s story), and it could dovetail nicely with a “Hulk 2″ set-up (which Feige admitted in our chat was something they weren’t planning in the moment.)
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1597523/story.jhtml"The truth is that Hulk has had two films in the past five years, and it's time to give some of the other guys a turn," Feige said of why there was no scheduled "Hulk 2." "But certainly what we are doing is suggesting and cross-pollinating the characters between films, and like reading a comic, I'd like to set that expectation that anything can happen and anyone can pop up in anybody else's story.
"I would expect that people may see the Hulk again soon before he is again carrying his own film," he concluded, shouting out "The Avengers" as a possibility.