P.B.&Chocolate
^Peanut Butter
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2005
- Messages
- 273
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I loved the whole TV ad .
LOL, that's probably why. I usually have a good eye for CG, but the last scene looked all right to me. The weird filtering and overexposure was what made it look fake, I think. Then again, it would be a CG metal suit, and it wouldn't stick out as badly as a CG human, which I can tell from a mile away.Umm...yeah you think that's a coincidence? People who play videogames actually have something to compare it to and we've seen cutscenes that look as good as that. That should tell you something shouldn't it?![]()
Don't get me wrong, I loved the TV Spot and what happens in the scene itself just not the the way the CGI was used in that particular scene. It looks alittle too fake.
So this is what a lot of us are claiming didn't look good?I deg to biffer.
![]()
This is what I always go by, not good... last place out of the movie ads.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2008admeter.htm
This is what I always go by, not good... last place out of the movie ads.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2008admeter.htm
So this is what a lot of us are claiming didn't look good?
I don't know what our standards are...but wow. That looks nice to me.
I just watched the spot. (Since I didn't see the game until the last minute.) It looked ok. It didn't blow me away. I think I didn't want to see new footage because I want to see it for the first time in theaters. I'll probably avoid other trailers if possible. (yeah right)
Back to the CGI. I don't make a big deal about it. Hulk and Lord of the Rings both had comparible CGI and one was good while the other one sucked. It's not about the CGI. That CGI above looks bad? O...kay.
The effects shots in Jaws are horrid and it's a great movie to this day. The effects in Transformers are far superior to those in Jaws. See how little difference it makes? I couldn't get out of the theater fast enough when I saw Transformers.
If we have a great movie around the effects it won't matter one bit how "real" they look. And a "fake" effect today blows away the effects of the past every time....do all older movies with effects suck? The alien queen in Aliens looks like what it is....a puppet. So what?
I don't know why some are getting upset b/c a lot of us thought the last shot looked to video gamey, you'd think we'd trashed the trailer, i said all the effects in it bar that one looked first class and that it was a fantastic showcase for the movie, I gave it 9/10, yet some seem to not want any form of even mild criticism.
That's just a panel of so called commercial watchers who sit their and analyze commercials second by second tied to a computer so they can get their job description in the news. On a side note: Weren't all the films advertised coming out well before Iron Man as well so they've been getting more exposure lately. And Hunter it's no more relevant that the 2 links I posted. I doubt even 1 millionth of 1% of the movie going audience consists of tv commercial graders. Where was the Dark Knight?![]()
I gave it a 10/10 probably because I was shocked at how different it was from the 1st one and the footage (though short) was spectacular to me. I'm sure a 9/10 is more deserving but never being a huge Iron Man fan...that spot sure grabbed me. I was pissed their was no Hulk trailer but the f/x just aren't ready yet and considering people found complaints about this awesome spot...I don't blame them.
I am surprised by the results you posted, I would have figured it to be at least in the middle of the pack, not in the bottom 5.This is what I always go by, not good... last place out of the movie ads.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2008admeter.htm
You don't blame ppl for being upset that others have the right to make a critique ? I don't get that, i gave the first IM teaser 10/10 because i thought it knocked it out the park, i thought the same about this one only they should have left the X360 shot out, thus 9/10.
MIA. WB didn't use their US broadcast spot. People in Canada with CTV got 10,000BC. Why Fox didn't air that, I have no clue.Where was the Dark Knight?![]()
I thought IM's spot looked cool, even if I'm still getting the "the film's only superficially fun" vibe from the footage.Warner didn't pull the Dark Knight ad did they Hunter? I don't think it was ever planned but I could be wrong. Also I don't doubt Mirko's knowledge and never questioned it...but I also know a thing or two about the industry not only as a fan & investor, but as a former stock broker who traded in the industry. I'm just amazed that someone can even complain about that tv spot. I enjoyed all the tv spots including Jumper and Wanted but I've seen all of that footage before over and over. This was all new and looked well polished to me.
Warner didn't pull the Dark Knight ad did they Hunter? I don't think it was ever planned but I could be wrong. Also I don't doubt Mirko's knowledge and never questioned it...but I also know a thing or two about the industry not only as a fan & investor, but as a former stock broker who traded in the industry. I'm just amazed that someone can even complain about that tv spot. I enjoyed all the tv spots including Jumper and Wanted but I've seen all of that footage before over and over. This was all new and looked well polished to me.
I'm talking about Universal's reasons for not putting out the Hulk trailer. And the last shot in the IM spot was my favorite part.
This is what I always go by, not good... last place out of the movie ads.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/admeter/2008admeter.htm