Indeed; if the villains that I'm about to mention are present in this film, I would use this TDK analogy on how their presence/importance should be portrayed in the upcoming film.
TDK Batman= Superman
TDK Harvey= Batman
TDK Joker= Lex Luthor
TDK Maroni= Deathstroke
TDK Lau/Scarecrow/The Rest o the Mob= Metallo
TDK Ramirez= Mercy
TDK James Gordon= Lois Lane
I bold the ones I agree with. Ironically, I feel like Superman should equal TDK with the Joker in terms of screen presence, driving the plot around, etc.
For me
Metallo=Dent. Heck TAS Metallo takes a visual hint from Two Face.
He should be a fully realized supporting figure (and I personally think Dent was slightly underwritten) , but should allow Superman to keep his own movie.
TDK Maroni-I ironically think Batman should fill this role. A minor character who is key to the plot with a bit of a personality who fades into the background.
Yes, I want MOS2 rather than a Superman/Batman driven sequel. I can dream, right?
Luthor should TOTALLY be in the background except for a few key scenes.
For me, Luthor=The Mob.
I don't want there to be ANY driving villain to be honest. I want the villain aspect to be a subplot, but the main plot to be devoted to the character of Clark and the relationships around him. When the main plot and subplot intertwine, I want Batman to complicate things.
Kind of like the TDKR comic, only with the roles switched, with Batman being Luthor's puppet. With Batman realizing the error of his ways after his actions stood in the way of Superman saving the day (I do want this to happen).
In the end of the day I want a great movie that serves as a character-driven sequel. I feel like we'll either get one or the other if we're lucky, but not both. I hope I'm wrong.