• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's the Superman Costume Thread! - Part 3

I'd actually chalk that up as much to reeve himself for that. That costume is apparently so "unflattering" that's it's been used as the litmus test as to who could play superman.

Cavill apparently was able to look somewhat decent in it in his try-out for zack that it became one the reasons he got the role i believe. Cavill talked about how nervous he was to wear it, as it wasn't very flattering to most physiques (this was him pre-bulk up too).
 
Not to be pedantic, but films aren't 'reality'. The title character didn't looks absurd in Superman the Movie because he was not presented as such.

That I agree with, but Superman: The Movie is a child of its time, and fit perfectly with the fashion and looks of the 1970's.

What I meant by 'reality' is this: Drawings in comic books and animation do not represent what a similar suit will look like on a real human being. Movies aren't reality, but you don't get around actors being real human beings. :oldrazz:

The difference is in the texture & the fabric. An artist can cheat, and doesn't have to worry about using the right fabric to achieve a certain look.

And for people bringing Spider-man up as an example (for still using spandex): that character has always had a more wiry, thin, unflattering look. Superman is supposed to look powerful. Statue-esque.

I really think they got the look right on Man of Steel - even without trunks, it's incredibly faithful to the icon we all know and love.

And ever since I saw this pic...:

tbdjonpeters123107.jpg


...I thought that they should more or less take this direction. And they did - in a much better way!
 
Last edited:
I'd actually chalk that up as much to reeve himself for that. That costume is apparently so "unflattering" that's it's been used as the litmus test as to who could play superman.

Cavill apparently was able to look somewhat decent in it in his try-out for zack that it became one the reasons he got the role i believe. Cavill talked about how nervous he was to wear it, as it wasn't very flattering to most physiques (this was him pre-bulk up too).
Interesting. They should dust off Adam West's old costume for auditions, too. Would love to see Bale doing "Nrgh Brhatt Voiyce" in that.
 
Bale auditioned for BB wearing one of the BF panther suits laying around warners.
 
Surely those sculpted rubber things have to be precisely tailor made?
 
Baby powder....?
Why not butter ?
Henry Cavill covered in butter, I think I just found Paula Deen's new fantasy.
 
That I agree with, but Superman: The Movie is a child of its time, and fit perfectly with the fashion and looks of the 1970's.

Superman didn't exactly blend into the crowd even back in the 70s.

Baby powder....?
Why not butter ?
Henry Cavill covered in butter, I think I just found Paula Deen's new fantasy.

Christian Bale: It's still not coming on man and the butter and the powder have made a paste!
 
Last edited:
Superman didn't exactly blend into the crowd even back in the 70s.

Christian Bale: It's still not coming on man and the butter and the powder have made a paste!

I get that. The point was: the Superman suit is perfect for a Superman suit in the 1970's. But for the new movie an update was needed.
 
Superman didn't exactly blend into the crowd even back in the 70s.



Christian Bale: It's still not coming on man and the butter and the powder have made a paste!

Haha.

Nolan: Is the paste black?
Bale: No, why?
Nolan: Well, if the paste was black you could spread it all over and make yourself a pair of paste pants!
 
My apologies if anyone has posted this early MOS concept art already, but how would you guys feel if they had used this costume variant in the movie instead?

1001807_549192298460567_1534084715_n.jpg
 
Apart from the inadvisable 1970s haircut, I don't really see how that differs from the traditional costume.
 
Looking at the costume now compared to over the years, actually losing the red undies was indeed a wise move. The costume has never looked better, and more alien looking too! Suppose it was a good idea for Martha not making Clark's suit anymore too. But that scene where Clark flew back to check on her where she complimented him on his suit was a quite nice little moment.
 
My apologies if anyone has posted this early MOS concept art already, but how would you guys feel if they had used this costume variant in the movie instead?

1001807_549192298460567_1534084715_n.jpg

I would've like it more. Except for the \S/.
 
that one looks much better than what we ended up with.

i dunno why all the costume art is so dark though. you'd think they would want to use lighting that would actually allow you to see the costumes design.
 
I'm glad we lost the trunk... I like the one in MOS better... Perhaps in the sequel I would like them to add a red belt to it like the 52 version and brighten up the colors of the suite. Minor changes is all that is needed for MOS 2.
 
Apart from the inadvisable 1970s haircut, I don't really see how that differs from the traditional costume.

That's why I posted it. It's basically the MOS costume with trunks, which shows how traditional the new suit really is despite the controversy surrounding its trunkless look.

I was just interested in hearing what the traditionalists thought about this variant. As Motown Marvel mentioned, the dark tone of the concept art makes it hard to see some stuff - but am I the only one who thinks those trunks look painted on? It doesn't look like they're another layer of clothing, just a differently-coloured part of the same one-piece suit.

By the way regwec, I love both parts of your sig. Have you read this article?
 
I heard that the voice against the trunkless design of the superman suit is getting louder. Called it a dishonour to the American culture... sorta. Heard any?
 
There is no need for a pointless belt in the Mos suit. The new 52 costume is one of the ugliest superhero costumes I have ever seen. MOS needs to take nothing from it; if anything DC needs to take a class from the designer of the MOS suit.
 
The new 52 costume is one of the ugliest superhero costumes I have ever seen. MOS needs to take nothing from it; if anything DC needs to take a class from the designer of the MOS suit.

I agree, Szetsilya. The Getting Old Fast.. err I mean New 52 costume only looks good when Jim Lee draws it. When anyone else tries, it ends up looking like crap.
 
Which is a pretty big flaw for a comicbook character design, when you think about it.
 
Why can't the New 52 just use my avi? ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
201,243
Messages
21,929,433
Members
45,726
Latest member
pamul
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"