Kryptonite in first film... Extent of use?

Discussion in 'Man of Steel' started by Zack Snyder, Apr 10, 2011.

?

??

  1. No kryptonite in first film period.

  2. Reveal it at the end as a discovery by Lex, but not yet used by him.

  3. Have it discovered midway through film, and use to create Metallo

  4. Lex already starts utilizing it, from scientific discoveries before Superman is known.

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Zack Snyder

    Zack Snyder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    0
    Love it? Sick of it? How would you handle it for first film?
     
    #1
  2. 7heBoss

    7heBoss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    The way I would do it is Krypton explodes and absolutely none of it drifts toward earth. I don't want it in the film at all.
     
    #2
  3. SuperDaniel

    SuperDaniel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    9,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    I say it is as important to the mythos of Superman as Luthor or Lois. Just because it was badly used and very inconsistent in SR doesnt it mean that it should never appear again in a movie.
     
    #3
  4. Zack Snyder

    Zack Snyder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesn't seem like Metallo will be in the first film (damn) so if that's the case, might as well leave it out as weapon for Lex in the first film. I would like Superman to rise above all and before the film end, a scene with Mercy who says to Lex "He has no weakness." and Lex has a gigantic operation going on where digging takes place. He then turns to her and says "Super or not... Every man has a weakness"
     
    #4
  5. KRIM

    KRIM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    0
    No Kryptonite at all. For now.

    It's overused and is hardly necessary to tell a Superman story. Better utilized for the villains that actually use it, such as Metallo and Lex. And for once, PLEASE make it rare. It's practically a supporting cast member and that's beyond convenient.
     
    #5
  6. sf2

    sf2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    that's right. i had have enough of kryptonite ***** in the previous movies/tv series.
     
    #6
  7. Rowsdower!

    Rowsdower! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2011
    Messages:
    27,939
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think it should be in the film, but used in a more interesting way than before. I loved what they did with it in Birthright. I also love the idea of Lex in a Kryptonite battlesuit. And of course, Metallo is powered by it, so that would work.

    Anything besides Lex just pulling it out of his pocket and holding it up to Superman. I am so sick of seeing that.
     
    #7
  8. KalMart

    KalMart 239-Bean Irish Chili

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    16,733
    Likes Received:
    0
    As long as it's not used as a piece of rock or a laser beam...with Superman just waltzing into a "Ha....gotcha'!" scheme...




    (Batman vs. Superman, Pt. 6)

    [​IMG]
     
    #8
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2011
  9. RoughNTumble

    RoughNTumble i m not desperate

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd like to see kara in a sequel. Her ship could land followed by kryptonite.
     
    #9
  10. Willi Berg

    Willi Berg On The Run

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    5,930
    Likes Received:
    56
    I don't want it so freely used either. I like how in the comics it was something slowly discovered, Superman was unsure what was happening to him. And when he did find out he became very concerned. It's got to be used sparingly and be (dramatically) built up again.

    I wouldn't want it as a major plot point right away. It's more effective the longer Superman is built up as invulnerable. Then the kryptonite appears. At this point, it just seems too convenient and cliche.

    [​IMG]
     
    #10
  11. El Payaso

    El Payaso Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    15,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thing with Superman is... how can you possibly put his life in danger? Nothing works but Kryptonite. It has to be there.
     
    #11
  12. Willi Berg

    Willi Berg On The Run

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    5,930
    Likes Received:
    56
    It's not just kryptonite that can defeat Superman. Other Kryptonians equal his power, monsters like Doomsday can defeat him, he's been mind-controlled by Maxwell Lord. He can be emotionally manipulated- that can stop him. There have been many other ways. You can't just rely on kryptonite as the solution all the time. I think it should show up at some point but the writers shouldn't have that to fall back on every time and whenever possible come up with something else.
     
    #12
  13. storyteller

    storyteller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,162
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I hear that bs idea that Superman can only be defeated by kryptonite again.......I'm going to troll that persons house. STAS did it well. The answer is technology. Can't kill supes with bullets.....into energy gun. Need someone to go toe to toe. Enter Parasite or the new Brainiac(who put Superman down without needing Kryptonite). Conventional weapons don't work on superman, so you create unconventional ones.
     
    #13
  14. hopefuldreamer

    hopefuldreamer Clark Kent > Superman

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is certainly possible to create life threatening scenarios without the use of Green K. It just requires the writers to decide on a consisent level of their meaning of 'invulnerable'.

    Like don't have him spinning the world backwards in one scene, and then getting beaten by electricity in the next.

    However, I love kryptonite. I shamefully consider it my Superman guilty pleasure. I never get tired of it :p

    And I think it has it's place, it's a part of the mythos.

    It's almost a cliched symbol. It is the symbol for 'every man has a weakness', and having it be this consistent, named, visual thing throught Superman lore is kind of cool. It's things like that, that make the story timeless. Because you can take all 'basic' elements of Superman (Clark, Lois, Superman triangle, Lex Luthor arch enemy, Kryptonite, Krypton exploding etc) and put them in the setting of whatever time your in, and they still work. Kryptonite is definitely a part of that basic element that runs through.

    It's been consistently badly used, yes. But i'll be slightly dissapointed if it's not used at least a little bit in the film.
     
    #14
  15. SuperMike335!!

    SuperMike335!! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    So long as its not an overused plot device, I don't mind it.
     
    #15
  16. Zack Snyder

    Zack Snyder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    0
    With Zod in the mix, does it make it more or less likely to see Kryptonite? I mean, if Zod and Lex are working together there is a potential for a weapons collaberation to happen. On the other hand, his power will be equal to that of Superman, even if not as skilled. I would still hope it is left as a discovery by Lex at the end. I dunno, kind of like the Joker's card in some capacity.
     
    #16
  17. DE LA LUNA

    DE LA LUNA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd rather have no kryptonite used in this film; it does not seem necessary since Zod will be the in it and he should be able to go toe to toe with Superman.

    When Kryptonite is introduced in later films I hope that they maintain its effects realistic - I mean, I hope that Kryptonite does not just zap all of Superman's powers instantly, it's better to have it affect him slowly. If a villain uses Kryptonite on Superman, he should still be able to have his powers - able to take off a Kryptonite necklace and throw it away far enough to save himself.
     
    #17
  18. jthom19802

    jthom19802 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    0
    Depends on the context. If it's some sort of main weapon point, I'd say no. But to introduce it in some sort of small way to add to the origin there I have no beef with that.
     
    #18
  19. SuperDaniel

    SuperDaniel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    9,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really liked the KRyptonite effects in Smallville that showed him getting poisoned.
     
    #19
  20. elgaz

    elgaz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    4
    Kryptonite should only be used when nothing else can present a physical threat to Superman. Ultimately, it's only a plot device as without it we have a Superman who's basically invincible against 99% of his enemies and threats, and the lack of perceived threat to our protagonist removes any tension or buildup from the film.

    Superman vs Zod?
    Superman vs Doomsday?
    Superman vs Brainiac?

    All very evenly matched, so no need for Kryptonite.

    Luthor presents more of an intellectual threat, and Metallo is not as powerful phsyically so both rely on Kryponite at times to strengthen their position.

    I personally wouldn't like to see it getting overused in the film. Let see the writers actually engage their brains and come up with something which can threaten Superman and isn't green or radioactive.
     
    #20
  21. GreenKToo

    GreenKToo In the fire

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Show it at the very end. I don't want it used in any way, shape, or form to stop Superman OR Zod.
    I want a good old fashioned a$$ kicking to be used in stopping the villain.
     
    #21
  22. afan

    afan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Green Kryptonite is the only substance that can kill Superman, but there are many ways to defeat(neutralize) him, and the rare nature of the element on Earth should make those alternative methods more prevelant.

    As far as including it in the first film......no...particularly if Zod is the villian.
     
    #22
  23. DIRECTOR

    DIRECTOR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Messages:
    8,209
    Likes Received:
    0
    based on Zod being in the film now, I don't think Kryptonite is used. At least, there is a story where Superman is where protective gear to use kryptoniite against Zod, I could see that happening
     
    #23
  24. JamalYIgle

    JamalYIgle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Based on Zod being in the film, Kryptonite absolutely has to be used. I'm sorry but Kryptonians are immortal, infinitely powerful and basically unstoppable by any other means. they don't need to eat or sleep, They only get tired until the utmost conditions. Kryptonite is the only leveler these beings have. That is unless you want humans running around firing red sun lasers.
     
    #24
  25. afan

    afan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why?
    Superman is the equal to Zod, and if you consider his "practice" using those powers Superman should have the advantage. If Zod breaks out of the Phantom Zone, sending him back is the resolution, sans Kryptonite.

    When did Kryptonians achieve immortality. They can still die, can't they?
     
    #25
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2011

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"