Dr. Manhatten,
(what's with the spelling?)
I somewhat agree with your assessment, but the amount of inconsistencies present in the final cut of this movie versus what was going on in all of the trailers, tv clips and actor's own discussions of their roles, is glaringly noticeable.
Where did some of the important music cues go? Look at Jean and Logan's first 'love' scene in the infirmary. Remember the dreamy choir bit heard in early clips? It is present on the soundtrack cd, so why not in the final cut?
What about the scene where Logan meets Jean and Magneto in the forest? There was a nice bit of melodramatic scoring here when he sees Jean (it is also in the final cd score), but in the final cut the music is muted until Magneto "throws" Logan against the tree.
"This is who I am, Bobby". Rogue says this in early teasers, which is likely from an alternate ending for her character. Not in the final cut.
"You might not come back..." Now, Wolverine is reduced to a simple "They're ready." Can you tell me what the kids have done in the preceding 80 minutes since the Danger Room scene that has made them any more "ready" than they were then? (When Wolverine claims to Storm, "They're not ready.") No suspense, no substance in the final cut version. It's therefore an emotionally flat moment. Bad filmmaking.
I could go on and on...
Yes, films this large require many shots and pickups, and are surely edited after debating many different takes of certain scenes. Point is, when such inconsistencies as I mentioned above are occuring, and on as large a scale as they are, it reeks of a "rushed" product, yes, but more importantly it signifies a real
indecision in the process of filmmaking, and a rather obvious sign that a
networked mentality is not only present, but interfering with any
consistent vision that is attempting to break through. The filmmakers' job, in this case, is stuck between not only working within this network of absolutes from all sides, but also delivering a "blockbuster product" that proves successful critically and industrially.
Now somehow, against all odds, Ratner and Fox have delivered a film that is performing at the box office. But that doesn't mean that many intelligent viewers aren't noticing gross inconsistencies not only with the film's relationship to its previous installments (or its source material), but within the film itself.
Now, I suppose there could be all sorts of reasons why your name is Dr. Manhatten; it could be as simple as, some other user has already taken the "correct" spelling name. But I'm also sure you're prepared to give one consistent reason for the choice of name, right?
(I don't intend any ill will about this, I'm just trying to make a point...)
Just like this movie should have given some consistency behind all of its motivations and decisions, creative, industrial and thematic.
