He doesn't need to know. The point is that's what they're selling. If they want people to think differently, they'd shouldn't sell it in such a manner. You can personally do what you like. But taking the marketing at face value is more then valid.
Of course, definitely sit out the movie if you'd like. I'll definitely do what I'd like and watch the film before judging it based off a teaser.
Then why take a shot at someone else for doing what they do?
I have the right to use sarcasm when I see fit. Just like someone else has the right to judge an entire film based off a teaser.
Sure. But that is not a live and let live situation. You're passing judgement on someone for doing the most basic, obvious thing. Reacting to advertisement.
You can feel and say what you want. I don't agree with passing judgment based off a 1:15 teaser and I chose to exercise sarcasm with my response. That's not going to change, especially based on my excitement for the movie. I am choosing to approach this with an open mind, despite what a teaser has shown. So, yes, live and let live.
Sounds like DreamWorks to me.
What a cynical film this is turning out to be, through and through. Yuck.
Lion King at least had Beyonce and Donald Glover singing.
Deconstructing the live action Disney remakes, the casting of those movies was a huge draw for audiences. Emma Watson playing Belle, Will Smith playing the Genie, Beyonce as Nala, etc. all were basically stunt casting to bait millennials into theaters in droves and it worked. But at least Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin diverged enough from the animated films to at least be somewhat different. The Lion King had practically the same script and score as the original and all the other problems it had like the photorealistic animals not being able to emote only made it worse.Lion King at least had Beyonce and Donald Glover singing.
