Superman Returns Mark Millar's thoughts on the movie . . .

skruloos said:
That's funny. I feel exatly the same way about Millar. But to each his own.

Millar's stories aren't really about shock value though. They rely heavily on character development, one liners, and pop culture reference, but not shock value.
 
Matt said:
Millar's stories aren't really about shock value though. They rely heavily on character development, one liners, and pop culture reference, but not shock value.
I don't know. While his work on X-Men wasn't too full of shock value, I do think his work on The Authority certainly was. But again, to each his own.
 
Y'know, discussion of Millar aside, it is really hard to say he is wrong. This is essentially the original Superman movie + a kid.
 
He doesn't sound like an acutual cook book fan, let alone Superman. It's probably some hired geek who has JUST seen the Superman movies as a kid, loved them, hopefully not after 2nd, and that's been his only true exposure to the Superman mythology.
 
skruloos said:
I don't know. While his work on X-Men wasn't too full of shock value, I do think his work on The Authority certainly was. But again, to each his own.

But it could be said that The Authority has always been based around shock value to a certain extent.
 
Matt said:
Morrison is over rated. I consider him the Howard Stern of comic books. He is like a shock jockey. He does things for the sake of shock value (Professor X's sister whom he killed in the womb, etc). In the end, his stories are lacking I think.
Your opinion, and you are certainly entitled to it, but Morrison's writing has always carried far more subtext than most, he's deeper and more intellectual, sometimes seemingly arcane but his innovation and storytelling abilities in my view far outweigh Millar's, though Millar certainly knows how to entertain.
 
Matt said:
Y'know, discussion of Millar aside, it is really hard to say he is wrong. This is essentially the original Superman movie + a kid.
I can see that argument. That's essentially what I said about Spider-man and Batman Begins. I felt that they followed the same basic formula. But that's why I loved both of them. Just like with those, it's all in the execution to me.
 
Matt said:
But it could be said that The Authority has always been based around shock value to a certain extent.
I don't think so. Ellis practiced a lot more restraint on that book than Millar.
 
The Watchman said:
Your opinion, and you are certainly entitled to it, but Morrison's writing has always carried far more subtext than most, he's deeper and more intellectual, sometimes seemingly arcane but his innovation and storytelling abilities in my view far outweigh Millar's, though Millar certainly knows how to entertain.

I dunno, Morrison relies too much on shock for my liking. Sometimes he has twists not for the sake of story but for the sake of having a twist.

His Emma/Scott story line seemed entirely out of character. Emma mind raping Scott was just weird. Cassandra Nova. Xorn = Magneto but not really Magneto. Secondary mutations.

There are all examples of the weird twists Morrison has if for no other reason than to have twists.
 
Millar's opinion to me is about as valid an opinion from Alex Ross :down
 
Alex Ross shouldnt write comic books...ever.

Drawing is okay...but never write!
 
As for the Cavaziel thing, based on everything I know on the topic, it does seem Cavaziel was kept around as a back up.
 
Mentok said:
Millar's opinion to me is about as valid an opinion from Alex Ross :down


Whew....wait till that crazy fanboy gets a hold of this film. I mean this is the guy that complained that the eyes on Spider-man's suit were not the Romita style of eyes.
 
Michael Corleone said:
Whew....wait till that crazy fanboy gets a hold of this film. I mean this is the guy that complained that the eyes on Spider-man's suit were not the Romita style of eyes.

Just to clear up...I'm not blind to the fact that a lot of u, myself included, complained about small things on the suit. I was just using as an example.
 
Dope Nose said:
as much as I love Mark Millar I think he's completely off on this. did Superman need to hit someone in '78?

I agree. Superman is all about good vs. evil and doing what's right, not so much about Superman beating the crap out the wrong-doer of the day. There's more to the character than "I need someone to hit" and Millar REALLY should know this by now.
 
mathhater said:
I agree. Superman is all about good vs. evil and doing what's right, not so much about Superman beating the crap out the wrong-doer of the day. There's more to the character than "I need someone to hit" and Millar REALLY should know this by now.

I see what millar's saying. shock. gasp.

Maybe it's purely for the sake of doing something cool, but I'd have really liked to see something similar to the Clark vs evil-supes battle in Superman 3. That was amazing, but too short to fully satisfy.

Lex knows how to hurt superman, and he will, he'll rape him mentally and all that good stuff, but I agree with Millar that with todays tech being so good, maybe we didn't need another Lex vs supes story... since nowadays we could do the supes vs krytonian fight ten times better than before..... It will be a hell of a sequel if something like that what Singer has planned.... One of the biggest appeals of superman is that he can do some amazing things with his powers and with a foe to match him in that aspect, we'd get some extremely awesome visuals, I'd bet. Like Matrix Revolutions, but not bad.
 
I think Millar got some of the points wrong & I disagree with him, but I understand where he's coming from. It true some are worry, but you have to keep an open mind until you see the movie. It could surprise you. ;)
 
Dope Nose said:
as much as I love Mark Millar I think he's completely off on this. did Superman need to hit someone in '78?


That's completely irrelevant. It's the year 2006.
 
Kane said:
Alex Ross shouldnt write comic books...ever.

Drawing is okay...but never write!
Ross has co-written quite a few of the books he's done art on. Including his current series Justice which everyone seems to love.
 
Like us Millar is voicing his feeling towards this movie based off what he has seen,it's equally as valid as anyone else's view and i don't see why some have a problem with that:confused:
 
Millar speaks the truth.

He's a savvy bloke.
 
hunter rider said:
Like us Millar is voicing his feeling towards this movie based off what he has seen,it's equally as valid as anyone else's view and i don't see why some have a problem with that:confused:

Because there is an evil power here that is trying to turn The Hype into BT, run Hunter run before they bring you up on charges for not blindly supporting everything SR :eek:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,273
Messages
22,078,357
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"