2kt09
Snyder Rent-Free
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
- Messages
- 12,604
- Reaction score
- 1,067
- Points
- 78
This is oddly worded.Eh? If things had been going well, they'd be in the same position of creative strength that Fiege et al. are in over at Marvel. Effectively 'we know what we're doing, so you do this'. As it stands it's more like 'we have no idea what we're doing, so we don't know if you should do what we say or not.'
Let's accept one thing off the bat:
It's a studio blockbuster which means after a lengthy and arduous process we hope that the filmmakers' style/vision makes it to the end.
If a franchise starts off well, you give the filmmakers as much creative clout as permissible within the limitations of a studio blockbuster to continue that success.
If it does poorly/under expectations be it after the fact (during its theatrical course) or during the development process, of course the studio will "meddle" IF it wants to continue rather than put it on the backburner to recoup & perhaps try again.
There's also the other perspective, which is entirely inescapable, greed - wherein micromanaging is apparently necessary to insure the best outcome possible.

t: