MCU vs thread....controversy and chaos

I'm drawing the inference that it took magical weapons of great power to overcome the necrosword, which was capable of one-shotting gods.

Love and Thunder was a dreadful film....but Gorr still wins this 10/10.
 
Babillygunn said:
Gorr can beat Thor.
Thor can beat Hulk.
Therefore Gorr should be able to beat Hulk.

But if Hulk had a bunch of children with him, it might’ve been a different story.
Click to expand...

Only if Hulk could magically pull the ability to create super powerful enchanted weapons out of his @$$ like Thor did in that awful film ..... worst bit of superhero writing since Superman fixed the Great wall of China by looking at it.

This year's cbms have made me sad, and this week's news about DC ( because I'm more of a DC fan) fill me with gloom.

Maybe....years from now, Disney will step over the burned wreckage of the MCU, and reboot the X-Men having learned from their mistakes.
 
Babillygunn said:
Gorr can beat Thor.
Thor can beat Hulk.
Therefore Gorr should be able to beat Hulk.

But if Hulk had a bunch of children with him, it might’ve been a different story.
Click to expand...
math-math-checks-out.gif


Gorr for the win.
 
Gorr vs Hulk:

Gorr 10/10, and its not even that hard. Gorr is at bare minimum in the same place power-wise as post-Infinity War Thor, and that is two power ups beyond the point where Hulk was still a peer to Thor. You know how Thanos beat up Hulk with his bare hands and without even trying all that hard? Yeah, that is what Hulk is going to get here, except its probably not going to be bare hands and its probably not going to take as long.
 
Babillygunn said:
Gorr can beat Thor.
Thor can beat Hulk.
Therefore Gorr should be able to beat Hulk.

But if Hulk had a bunch of children with him, it might’ve been a different story.
Click to expand...
Scissors can beat paper, paper can beat rock, so scissors should definitely be able to slice through rock! (unless rock has kids with scissors :cwink: )
 
Batgirl0202 said:
Deadpool!!

Even if he couldn't outpower Clint (unlikely) he would still quip him to death...

deadpool-gasp.gif
Click to expand...


Deadpool wins 10/10. Clint fires all his arrows, unloads his guns and throws any knives he has.

Then in melee combat he stabs, disembowls and decapitated Deadpool .... but Deadpool keeps regenerating until Clint gives up and finally goes home.
Merry Christmas!
 
Hawkeye vs Deadpool:

Hawkeye 9/10, assuming the fight doesn't start in melee range. You all seem to keep forgetting that it doesn't matter if someone will *eventually* heal up, if they are put out of action, they lose. And Deadpool is absolutely going to be perforated, exploded, electrocuted, tied up, and otherwise incapacitated more than enough to be out of action. If anything regeneration is *bad* thing for Deadpool, since it means Clint doesn't even have to worry about accidentally killing someone he doesn't want to kill.
 
metaphysician said:
Hawkeye vs Deadpool:

Hawkeye 9/10, assuming the fight doesn't start in melee range. You all seem to keep forgetting that it doesn't matter if someone will *eventually* heal up, if they are put out of action, they lose. And Deadpool is absolutely going to be perforated, exploded, electrocuted, tied up, and otherwise incapacitated more than enough to be out of action. If anything regeneration is *bad* thing for Deadpool, since it means Clint doesn't even have to worry about accidentally killing someone he doesn't want to kill.
Click to expand...

Struggling to see how virtual immortality is a disadvantage in this fight, or any fight - sure Clint doesn't have to hold back and can shoot to kill, strike to kill..... the problem being that no matter what he does he won't actually be able to kill Deadpool.

Putting Deadpool out of action is not an easy feat. He can still function while literally ripped in half. Hawkeye would have to literally blast him into separate body parts.

Given that a full quiver of Hawkeye arrows all exploding under his feet didn't kill or dismember Kingpin, who doesnt have a healing factor like Deadpool's - it doesn't seem likely to have sufficient power to incapacitate Deadpool.

Meanwhile Deadpool only has to shoot, stab or knock out Hawkeye once. If Deadpool takes this fight even slightly seriously, Hawkeye is a dead man.

"Maximum Effort!"

Unless there's a 10 second Knockdown rule, there's very little chance Hawkeye wins this.
 
If by "Can still function" you mean "Is no longer able to meaningfully fight", then sure, Deadpool can still function after being repeatedly zatzed. A mobility kill is still a kill, and a win is a win. If the opponent can't actually fight anymore, they have lost, even if they can still mouth off at their opponent.
 
metaphysician said:
If by "Can still function" you mean "Is no longer able to meaningfully fight", then sure, Deadpool can still function after being repeatedly zatzed. A mobility kill is still a kill, and a win is a win. If the opponent can't actually fight anymore, they have lost, even if they can still mouth off at their opponent.
Click to expand...

I dont think Hawkeye has the firepower to damage Deapool beyond zero functionality. If it were Deadpool vs the Winter Soldier maybe. Cable had massive firepower and was only able to beat Deadpool due to his superhuman cyborg strength and durability.

Deadpool took a full mag from Cable at near point blank range and could still fight.

The deciding factors for me are Deadpool's immortality and that their skill levels aren't dissimilar, so any exchange where Hawkeye shoots, stabs, cuts or hits Deadpool, there's a pretty even likelihood that Deadpool is going to get in at least one hit - with a bullet, a sword or a brick. Even if Hawkeye lands multiple killing blows ( with arrows, swords or bullets), they're only going to slow Deadpool down a little. If Deadpool lands one blow that causes more than a minor wound....Hawkeye is finished.
 
If Nat and Clint were ever going to have any chance against him at all, it would have to be without the shield. And even then I'm not entirely convinced they could pull it off. With the shield it's just a question of how long they last before Cap's inevitable victory.
 
Bayne said:
If Nat and Clint were ever going to have any chance against him at all, it would have to be without the shield. And even then I'm not entirely convinced they could pull it off. With the shield it's just a question of how long they last before Cap's inevitable victory.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%.

In hand to hand, no shield, no weapons Cap wins 11 times out of 10.

In hand to hand, no shield, where Clint and Nat have melee weapons Cap wins 10/10.

If Nat has guns, Clint his bow and Cap has no shield.... Cap wins 9/10.

Give Cap his shield and it is over, quickly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Dark Raven
TV Hulk, Thor vs present-day MCU heroes. Who would win?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Quasar
Q
BigThor
  • Poll Poll
MCU Tag Team Battles: Black Widow & Okoye Vs. Daredevil & Crossbones
Replies
19
Views
4K
Yowza
Yowza
gamemiester
  • Poll Poll
Marvel film fights tournament: Round 1
Replies
5
Views
1K
bulok
B
Batmannerism
  • Poll Poll
Best Fight scene (not battle) in the MCU ?
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
MessiahDecoy123
MessiahDecoy123
Godzillasaurus
Black Widow Solo: How Would You Do It?
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
gildedmuse
G

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 2,537 (members: 16, guests: 2,521)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,611
Messages
21,995,733
Members
45,793
Latest member
khoirulbasri

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"