TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,836
- Reaction score
- 15,076
- Points
- 103
The implication was that his wife is still alive, and that while they still love each other, they have to be apart in order to protect her
Skyfall was a good movie, but honestly, the Mission Impossible films have really owned Bond in recent years. And I say this as a Bond fan. The action has been better for starters. The daring stunts of holding onto planes and climbing skyscrapers used to be the Bond franchise's bread and butter - eg. bunjee jumping and skiing off mountains. Tom Cruise, in his love of Charlie Chaplin, has truly kept this spirit alive. Bond still has this mindset in places, but it's just not the same. The humor in Mission Impossible has also been more apparent without breaking the serious atmosphere, and the extended cast has been solid.Well, most movies take their cues from James Bond in regards to love interests in sequels.
The implication was that his wife is still alive, and that while they still love each other, they have to be apart in order to protect her
I have pretty much loved every Mission Impossible flick other then the second. But I wouldn't take any of them over Casino Royale and Skyfall. Especially Casino Royale.Skyfall was a good movie, but honestly, the Mission Impossible films have really owned Bond in recent years. And I say this as a Bond fan. The action has been better for starters. The daring stunts of holding onto planes and climbing skyscrapers used to be the Bond franchise's bread and butter - eg. bunjee jumping and skiing off mountains. Tom Cruise, in his love of Charlie Chaplin, has truly kept this spirit alive. Bond still has this mindset in places, but it's just not the same. The humor in Mission Impossible has also been more apparent without breaking the serious atmosphere, and the extended cast has been solid.
It's a genius sequence. The wire descent in the first film is iconic, but for my money, the Ghost Protocol scene is better.That Burj khalifa scene was definitely a Bond thing, though that's owed more to Brad Bird more than anything.
I don't mind MI:2, it's just that I prefer the others in the series.Why you dissing my boy John Woo like this? Did you not see the bike sequence?
Yeah, but I think that trope needs to change. It works in Bond films because he's supposed to be a womanizer but Ethan Hunt is a bit different. Plus, he got married in one of the movies, even though that's more or less been forgotten now, I guess. Regardless though, even though Hunt has what appears to be romantic chemistry with Ferguson's character, they never actually hook up, and I honestly don't think they need to. Female leads can do more than just hook up with male leads, and that's what they should continue doing with her.
Surprising piece of casting.
I guarantee at least one scene where Cruise and he duke it out shirtless.
Whatever one thinks of UNCLE, I thought it was fine except for the villains which ultimately held the film back greatly, Cavill in that makes a good case for himself in these types of films.
I hope he brings out a more fleshed out character compared to his man from UNCLE portrayal.
His performance was really wooden.
rumor has it henry is the villain
People say this, but I don't get it at all. He isn't wooden at all in UNCLE imo. It is almost like people are applying his Superman to his role there.I hope he brings out a more fleshed out character compared to his man from UNCLE portrayal.
His performance was really wooden.
Again... If Ferguson returns I expect her character and Cavs to have a past of some kind.