Movie Within a Movie?!

I'm thinking we won't be seeing Mysterio but will be getting a reference to the name Quentin Beck. I would love to see the Mysterio costume on film but sadly I believe that we won't.
 
Iglius said:
Don't know if this is obvious or if it has been said, but the "movie within a movie", if its true, will probably have something to do with Spider-Man Day and the town's sudden praise of Spidey.
so gwen is an actress in the movie?
 
Screenscribe said:
I doubt this is true since the report is a play by play of the Ultimate Spider-Man comic (yeah I know someone said it already). it's possible, and with Avi Arad pulling more strings than normal it wouldn't surprise me, he forced venom into the film (God, I hope it works out) an now a stolen scene. Hope its not true.
he didnt forced venom in the movie :whatever:
 
dark_b said:
he didnt forced venom in the movie :whatever:

You're Right. They didn't force him in the movie. It was for the ongoing struggle for Peter Parker as Spider-Man. Rami picked the best villians to suite that.
 
NewYorkSpider said:
You're Right. They didn't force him in the movie. It was for the ongoing struggle for Peter Parker as Spider-Man. Rami picked the best villians to suite that.
well i dont know the whole story. i guess venom was not be raimis first choice. but raimi made two great spiderman movies and they made a lot of money. so i dont think that he would be forced to have venom.

bit i remember reading that raimi wanted teh symbiote story in the third movie. so wanst it obvious that venom would be in the movie?
 
dark_b said:
well i dont know the whole story. i guess venom was not be raimis first choice. but raimi made two great spiderman movies and they made a lot of money. so i dont think that he would be forced to have venom.

bit i remember reading that raimi wanted teh symbiote story in the third movie. so wanst it obvious that venom would be in the movie?

It was kinda obvious. Because they knew what we wanted. Rami said he didn't like Venom. So i don't know where you heard he wanted the symbiote story in there. They will do anything to please us fans.
 
NewYorkSpider said:
It was kinda obvious. Because they knew what we wanted. Rami said he didn't like Venom. So i don't know where you heard he wanted the symbiote story in there. They will do anything to please us fans.
then i maybe read that he wanted peter going dark. and this is where the symbiote comes.
 
I dont know guys... I mean a spidey movie within the spider-man 3 movie!!!??? It's sounds pretty lame to me... It's like what happened in the scream movies:(
 
dark_b said:
then i maybe read that he wanted peter going dark. and this is where the symbiote comes.

The thing Is, If Rami wanted Venom in this picture badly. Then we would have got a whole movies worth of him. But from my understanding. We only get 10 miniutes worth.
 
Wait a minute ! That can't be true ! The report says that Sam Raimi is going to have a cameo as the director of the Spider-Man movie but didn't we see a picture of him already having a cameo as an officer in the army or something like that ? I'll try to find the picture in question.
 
^ The dude was just wearing that getup just to be wearing that getup. :huh:
 
I can see it now like at the end of Chicken Little a massive exaggeration on who people THINK Spidey is.
 
cmill216 said:
^ The dude was just wearing that getup just to be wearing that getup. :huh:

He was wearing that outfitt because he had been given the nickname of "The Admiral" on set. So, he dressed like an Admiral as a joke.
 
That's great news... I KNEW that the waiter rumor can't be true...
Well maybe he'll be both ^^
 
So who do you think will be playing the movie within the movie Spider-Man? Do you think they will give him mechanical webshooters?
 
<(o_o)> said:
So who do you think will be playing the movie within the movie Spider-Man? Do you think they will give him mechanical webshooters?
that would be funny as hell, i would make this only to piss of fans :oldrazz:
 
I am not too crazy about this recent news. It was confirmed that Bruce Campbell was playing a waiter in Spider-Man 3.The idea of a movie within a movie sounds cool but, I am still confused what to think concerning this issue.
 
Spider-Grrl1516 said:
He was wearing that outfitt because he had been given the nickname of "The Admiral" on set. So, he dressed like an Admiral as a joke.

I assure you, this is not a joker but a cameo. Plus, Raimi confirmed at the San Digeo Comic Con during the Q&A that Bruce Campbell wasn't playing Quentin Beck.

You wish that could be true but you know that it's not. I mean, it will be just TOO MUCH to introduce Spider-Man : The Movie, because it's a very dark story.
 
As long as he's Beck, thats awesome. They don't need Mysterio as another villian. Don't overcrowd it.

Edit: If Raimi says he's not Beck, then this is just another rumor.
 
cmill216 said:
^ The dude was just wearing that getup just to be wearing that getup. :huh:

Yea he was....another report now says he's playing Mysterio.

I like your pic, I am from Cincinnati and met that eccentric person we call ochenta y cinco, now. You gotta love 'em.
 
sometimes villians that are not in the movie and have a secret identity or human side, they usually make cameos as not in villian form but in human form, maybe sam will make quintin beck a cameo, bruce cambell has had a role in both spiderman movies so far, in the 3rd one why not have him make a cameo as quintin beck.
 
So he's gone from an Usher to a special effects guy to a maniac with a vendetta against Spider-Man.

Some profession change....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"