I haven't seen this movie yet, but what i have grown tired of since these comicbook/movie films have taken shape, is the LAZY approach by hollywood, critics, some fans and the hiring a directors, writers..etc to protary the material as "just being..".
What i mean is if "TFers" fails.... then it's looked at as "well it's just toys", if FF, G.I.joe, etc fails...everyones approach and excuse is always "well they are just *insert excuse* so what did you expect, let's just re-tell the story this way because they are just toy, the audience isn't gonna understand or no the difference??
That's crap, because if hollywood gave a crap, and if the directors and writers had any talent you can take any source material and make a great film...it doesnt have to be shakespearian
;just a solid action movie....i.e. "The avengers"
These comicbooks have great source material and great characters to build on if done right, the characters persona is no different then a character written and portrayed by ocars worthy talent..so to speak...
again not asking for anything shakespearian...but you couldnt (for example) write cobra commander to be a great villian? he's a terrorist right...how many "terrorist" have we seen in films, and they turned out be great villains/solid villians..."darth vader,joker"...moving away from the comic book genre 'Hans Gruber" from die hard as another example...
not to sound like i'm leap frogging from one point to the another, but in the comics "cobra commander" and "megatron" are written as great villians, the cartoons although cheesy you do get a sense of them being fascinating villains...so knowing all that, how the hell a hollywood writer and director couldnt get those characters (so to speak...) right...and i dont mean just them...but all the characters they try to protary in these movies...i mean it's not hard..
i'm sure a film student could do a better job..

frustrated