No Film has ever had Great three sequels in a row

Jurassic Park 3 was good?

I don't know. But what I find original in that trilogy is that they partially used the members of the original for both sequels. Just my opinion.

D!
 
On Butterbean's behalf and his pm threats...he/she did say that no movie franchise has had a good, quality, successful film after 3. He/she isn't talking about trilogies...he/she is talking after trilogies. I don't agree with him/her or what he/she said but to get this thread back on track that is what he/she means.

THANK YOU CHASETER!!!!!!

There are plenty of good trilogies out there!!!

I'm talking about the third sequel,

Definition: Third sequel means PART FOUR......

My theory is they should stop after 3, because no film trilogy has ever produced a great part 4 to it's previous 3.......

If you disagree name a successful part 1,2,3, and 4.

Star Wars got to a fourth installment and failed......

Batman couldnt even get to a great 3........

Etc, etc, etc, etc...
 
Spider-Man 1,2 and probably 3 will all be a great trilogy....

But a Spider-Man 4 will not do too well....Even if Sam, Tobey returns, they will be burnt out and not care about the product.

They either need a 4-5 year break to do other projects and then come back or Sony just stop after this story....

But Sony won't. They want to suck all the money out of the Spider-Man franchise as possible, so they will give you Spider-Man 4 with Jake G and Scarlett Johannsen. It will suck too....
 
everybody liked spider-man 1. As far as movies go it was unique, fun, and depressing.

spider-man 2 blew people away i think.

I think the franchise will lose steam after this becuase of the villain choices they made for part 3. part 3 should have been the lizard, green goblin, and the return of dock ock.

First of all, Both sm1 and 2 imo were mediocre at best and for the most part are quite boring movies. However, sm3 looks like it has a lot of potential to be a great movie. If it is, then the movies can continue, we've got villains like, the lizard, kraven, electro and vulture that can be used, hell even hobgoblin.
 
Die Hard 2 wasn't even a Die Hard Film...It was a book that just used Die Hard characters..and yes it sucked big time.

Only great trilogies imo are Star Wars OT, Back to the Future, and prolly going to be Spider-Man. And I can't think of any more right now....

Terminator 3 was good, not great. Alien 3 wasn't near as good as 1 and 2...

Austin Powers failed at number 3.
 
I'm not all that into the Bond flicks... Aliens (as in alien 2) By James Cameron was the only REAL badass alien flick, it's far better than any of the others! as for LOTR, I think FellowShip is the best!

I know there's a lot of movie's coming out this summer; Pirates3, Transformers, Harry Potter 5, Die Hard 4.0... I still believe that Pirates will come in on top at the box-office though... It's definitly competition, but as for the better movie, It looks like Spidey 3 should feel more threatened by Transformers, then Pirates3.

First of all, go watch Dr.No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger and Thunderball, you need some Bond culture in your life. Secondly, Aliens 1 to 3 are awesome, period, it's not even debatable :cwink:

For some reason, I just think transformers may end up being a huge let down. I want the movie to be awesome but something tells me I'm going to be dissapointed. Anyway, like I've said before, the BO king could be any one of the various summer movies we're all looking foward to, I just hope sm3 finally brings the heat.
 
Scary Movie 4!!!!! LOL I was kidding

Toy Story 3 is on the way, those guys can make good movies, so I think we have a good trilogy there.
I think the same on Rush Hour 1, 2 & 3.

Batman couldnt even get to a great 3

Batman Forever wasn't as cool as the original, or course, but I think it was entertaining. Batman & Robin is like the worst comic book movie ever. I think Schumacher thought he could do something colorful and funny like the TV serie with Adam West... damn he was wrong!

For me the best trilogy ever is Back To The Future.

EDIT:

For some reason, I just think transformers may end up being a huge let down
That's because Michael Bay is a presumptuos (sp?) bastard who thinks everything he does is gold... and is not. That way of thinking made him make horrible movies lately (Bad Boys 2 -with that 1457 running time; and The Island).

D!
 
I didnt really like that mucho spidey 1, i mean it was good and all but, in my opinion it was kinda like childish, i mean it was like they made it for the younger fans than the older fans. compare spidey 1 with xmen, xmen was far more intense. spidey 2 was much better, even though in my opinion they didnt make a strong conflict between spidey and doc ock, cuz if it wasnt for harry, ock wouldnt have fought with spidey at the end, while in the spidey story he is one of the biggest villains in the spidey story, so in my opinion the other 2 spidey movies were not that great, but i think that this one is going to be the best one yet. Oh and tehre you have another great trilogy, Xmen, even though the third one kinda f***ed the story for another 4th film
 
so they will give you Spider-Man 4 with Jake G and Scarlett Johannsen. It will suck too....

Just how magical is your crystal ball?

Firstly, If Tmags and co left after 3, I'll be happy. Bring on Jake G, he's younger and has more charisma than Tobey could ever hope to have. It also keeps the franchise fresh. I love Connery and to me, he IS James Bond but we needed the new actors to come and do their bit, it's an inevitable change that works out for the best....and even if Jake G and Scarlett were in a spidey movie, how do you know it'll suck. Many people recognise Jake as a good and diverse actor and scarlett as a superior actress to Dunst...at the end of the day, all a spidey movie needs is, a good script and capable actors.
 
Just how magical is your crystal ball?

Firstly, If Tmags and co left after 3, I'll be happy. Bring on Jake G, he's younger and has more charisma than Tobey could ever hope to have. It also keeps the franchise fresh. I love Connery and to me, he IS James Bond but we needed the new actors to come and do their bit, it's an inevitable change that works out for the best....and even if Jake G and Scarlett were in a spidey movie, how do you know it'll suck. Many people recognise Jake as a good and diverse actor and scarlett as a superior actress to Dunst...at the end of the day, all a spidey movie needs is, a good script and capable actors.

LOL...Congrads on the troll job ! ! ! !

jake and scarlett better than tobey and dunst...LOL, u are a riot! I can't even come up with better material than that. Bravo on the troll job.
 
Your calling 7000 a troll when you started a whole thread to lie about seeing spider-man 3, under a different account lol?

7000 does have a point, the bond franchises, as well as the harry potter movies as far as directors are concerned, have proven that fresh blood in a series can be good.
 
jake and scarlett better than tobey and dunst...LOL, u are a riot!

I do think Jake G can make a better SpiderMan. Many people in this forums agree, so you're surrounded by riots in that case. Not sure about Scarlett though.

D!
 
Please explain to me how I'm a troll? Do you even know what a troll is? Please don't use words you clearly don't understand :whatever:

secondly, I said, Jake is good, has diversity and has more charisma than tobey. Go watch their respective movies with your eyes open, it is blatantly clear that Jake has more charisma.

Thirdly, Scarlett imo is a better actress and is better looking, simple as...

Unlike you, I'm not stuck on some silly spider-man movie cast worship.:o
 
maybe the first great comic book trilogy.
 
Aliens 1 to 3 are awesome
Wow, you actually think Aliens 3 was awesome. The overwhelming mojority of fans of that series thought it was (using YOUR favorite words) MEDIOCRE at best. In fact, this is the first time I've ever read someone who actually like that film.
 
what about letal weapon? Lord of the Rings?

What about Star Trek 3 which was extremely good? and 4 extremely good, and 5, and 6, and 7, which were all descent? and then part 8 which was the best one? and then 10 which was extremely good?
 
Wanting the Spider-Man movies to stop because of lesser movie history is ridiculously idiotic. Why the hell would you want that? You don't know if SM4 would be crap and you certainly don't have any say so in the matter. If Raimi and company stay for another, you honestly think the movie would suck because it is so "rare" to have great movies beyong a trilogy. I also love the movies you gave examples for...Alien and Rocky...:whatever: Ohhh great movies. And part 4 of the Star Wars series would be episode 4 and coincedentally the first movie they ever made. Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, etc...are a great series of movies and I am sure the Hobbit will add to the LOTR franchise perfectly. The new Bond series is off to a great start, the new Batman series is off to a great start, etc... etc... etc...

And it is also extremely laughable that you named Goblin 1 & 2, Doc Ock, and Venom as the core villians and anything after that would be overkill...LMFAO.:woot:

When you have to steal plots points from Superman 3 I think you can safely say the franchise is going downhill.
 
The same plot points can be found in any various movies, comic books, novels or children's books. The comic book industry and movie industry are full of the same plot points...and you will probably pay money to see most of them this year. Even Stan Lee is guilty of doing this, as are most writers/artists/directors.
 
Wow, you actually think Aliens 3 was awesome. The overwhelming mojority of fans of that series thought it was (using YOUR favorite words) MEDIOCRE at best. In fact, this is the first time I've ever read someone who actually like that film.

Yes, granted that Aliens 3 wasn't as brilliant as the 1st 2, it's still a damn good movie.... and the key word from your post is, thought, as in past tense. It is now being recognised as a classic that people originally slept on, just like what OHMSS was to the Bond franchise.
 
It is in no way recognised as a classic (like Alien/Aliens are) or even close, and most wouldn't even call it a damn good or even a good movie. I'm sure there are a few who like it, although, Aliens 3 is where most would say the franchise took a huge nose-dive.

However, I love Fincher's work, he's a damn good director, just not in the genre of sci-fi/action movies. Perhaps if he had an original sci-fi movie written just for him or maybe a sci-fi novel to adapt, he would do great, but not taking over the works of two great sci-fi directors like Scott/Cameron. :o
 
As for the "JURASSIC PARK" films!

The 1'st movie was phenomenal! It's a timeless movie-experience! You just buy everything in the movie to the point where you're actually thinking COULD it really be possible???

"The Lost World" is IMO exstremely UNnessecary! NOT a bad movie, just as I mentioned VERY UNnessecary! The T-Rex loose in the city in the end is always cool to watch though!

As for the third picture!!!! It BLOWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not even worth writing about!
 
the first and the second spidey movie are awesome , for the third we have 2 wait and see

the problem you have with the movies for sequels is that writhers start with something and dont know how 2 end it

from comics 2 movies you got something diffrent , there you have a background off a 1.000.000. comics from other great writhers to tell a story

then you can have a story with ... electro , hydroman , kraven , chameleon and dont forget the lizard ect....

and all this movies will be blockbusters with the wright team :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,974
Members
45,876
Latest member
Pducklila
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"