Official 2008 MLB thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Couple of Rumors


Possible Glavine destinations:Braves, Phils, Mets, Astros, Cardinals, and Nats.

Jason Bay possibly on the move to the Tribe, also possibly Raul Ibanez.

Mets are Interested in Torrealba

Also read that many believe Arod could return to the Yanks...if not it will come down to the Dodgers or Angels, with the loser pursuing Cabrera.

glavine is pretty much worthless at this point. any team that signs him will probably regret it.

bay would be an awesome addition to the indians. he had a bad year last year due to an injury, but when he's healthy he's one of the better hitting outfielders in baseball.
 
Fran™;13240188 said:
It's okay, stay in NY, and choke in the playoffs again.

Because Detroit's loading up once again :up:

I don't think he'll go back, I think he knows that he needs a team that will offer him big money to negotiate with other teams. It actually sounds like it's all a ploy by Boras.
 
Anyone see DJ Gallo on ESPN talking about Arod....he said Arod is writing a childrens book titled:

2 to 1 "Bases Loaded and Two Outs in October: A Pop-Up Book," by Alex Rodriguez

:)
 
I don't think he'll go back, I think he knows that he needs a team that will offer him big money to negotiate with other teams. It actually sounds like it's all a ploy by Boras.

Boras isn't included in the meetings though
 
Anyone see DJ Gallo on ESPN talking about Arod....he said Arod is writing a childrens book titled:

2 to 1 "Bases Loaded and Two Outs in October: A Pop-Up Book," by Alex Rodriguez

:)

At least he has a sense of humor.
 
Anyone see DJ Gallo on ESPN talking about Arod....he said Arod is writing a childrens book titled:

2 to 1 "Bases Loaded and Two Outs in October: A Pop-Up Book," by Alex Rodriguez

:)

That's awesome.
 

I thought you were saying that the rumor of him going back to the Yanks was a ploy by Boras....I was saying that it was reported by the newspaper that he wasn't included in the meetings, and hadn't known that the Yankees were contacted....im confused
 
I thought you were saying that the rumor of him going back to the Yanks was a ploy by Boras....I was saying that it was reported by the newspaper that he wasn't included in the meetings, and hadn't known that the Yankees were contacted....im confused

I was saying that Boras told him to go to the Yankees and see what they offer. This way Boras can use it as a negotiating tool with other teams.
 
Mets Close To Deal With Castro

UPDATE, 11-14-07: Ken Rosenthal agrees, it looks like a Torrealba/Castro tandem for the Mets. Interestingly they're expected to split playing time about evenly. Creative!

FROM 11-13-07:

The Associated Press is reporting that the Mets are close to re-signing catcher Ramon Castro. I'd figured Castro would ask for starter money, but maybe not.

The Mets also plan on making an offer to free agent catcher Yorvit Torrealba, according to ESPN Radio (hat tip to MetsBlog). Torrealba currently has a two-year, $6MM offer on the table from the Rockies. If he's a man of his word, he'll give the Rox a chance to match the Mets' offer.

Torrealba and Castro could combine to really shut down the running game, though both had off years in that department in '07. Torrealba's problem can be attributed to a lingering strained shoulder. Castro's, I have no idea.
Here's the Torrealba article
 
silva, easily. silva's at least a league average pitcher with a few good years left in his arm. glavine's cooked.

Silva is on the verge of being a project. Think 2006 Oliver Perez with the Pirates. he's awful.
 
Silva is on the verge of being a project. Think 2006 Oliver Perez with the Pirates. he's awful.

from espn.com:

Rob Neyer said:
Silva has All-Star potential
posted: Friday, November 9, 2007 | Feedback | Print Entry

With Curt Schilling off the market, the No. 1 free-agent starting pitcher is -- believe it or not -- Carlos Silva. Might seem a bit strange, considering that Silva racked up a 5.94 ERA in 2006 ... and he was healthy.

Patrick Sullivan is a bit less than impressed ...

He is a ground-ball pitcher, a good thing by most any account, but his ability to induce ground balls is really the only element of his game that prevents him from being an all-out disaster on the mound. See the following:

YEAR G/F HR ERA+
2004 1.58 23 112
2005 1.55 25 129
2006 1.29 38 75
2007 1.57 20 103

His consistency in 2004, 2005 and 2007 inspire confidence, but his disastrous 2006 shows that Silva walks a fine line on the mound. As you can see in 2006, when the sinker ain't sinkin' and the balls are flying out of the yard, Silva becomes a crummy pitcher pretty quickly. Any team willing to pony up the $30 million-$40 million guaranteed will have to be assured that Silva has become a surefire ground-ball machine, because minus that skill, his effectiveness all but disappears.

The ability to induce ground balls is not the only positive element of Silva's game. Silva never walks anybody. In 2005, he walked only nine batters in 188 innings. Over the last two seasons, he's walked roughly one batter per start. That, as much as all the ground balls, is how he survives. That horrible 2006? That was the exception rather than the rule. He gave up roughly 15 more homers than usual, and he also was "hit-unlucky" (more batted balls dropped for hits than we would have expected). You put Silva on a National League team with a good defense behind him, and he's solid. Give him a few breaks and he's an All-Star.
 
you should read the whole thing. neyer makes some good points. he's one of the more intelligent baseball writers around.
 
Edited my post. He's not intelligent if he thinks Silva is even remotely good.

Silva has a .287 BAA and a .304 BABIP (H-HR)/ (AB - SO - HR + SF). He gives up a ton of hits (229 in 200.1 IP). Silva wouldn't even be discussed if every team didn't need SP and the market sucked.
 
He says Silva is a ground ball pitcher. However, he gives up a home run about every start. He's awful. Steve Trachsel would be a better signing than Silva.

:huh: he only gave up 20 HRs in 33 starts last year. that's not great, but it's not terrible either.

Edited my post. He's not intelligent if he thinks Silva is even remotely good.

sorry, but i'll take neyer's word over yours since he's got logic and statistical evidence on his side. silva had a lousy year in '06, but every other season he's been around league average or better. he's good for about 180-200 innings, an ERA around 3.70-4.30 and double-digit wins. plus he's only 28. he's no ace, but he's pretty decent #3 or #4 starter.

trachsel's OK, but he's 37 and last year he gave up more walks than strikeouts, had an ERA close to 5 for two straight years, gives up more flyballs than silva and gives up about the same amount of homers on a yearly basis as silva. you're fooling yourself if you think trachsel or glavine are better options at this point in their careers.
 
:huh: he only gave up 20 HRs in 33 starts last year. that's not great, but it's not terrible either.
It is for a groundball pitcher.

sorry, but i'll take neyer's word over yours since he's got logic and statistical evidence on his side. silva had a lousy year in '06, but every other season he's been around league average or better. he's good for about 180-200 innings, an ERA around 3.70-4.30 and double-digit wins. plus he's only 28. he's no ace, but he's pretty decent #3 or #4 starter.

trachsel's OK, but he's 37 and last year he gave up more walks than strikeouts, had an ERA close to 5 for two straight years, gives up more flyballs than silva and gives up about the same amount of homers on a yearly basis as silva. you're fooling yourself if you think trachsel or glavine are better options at this point in their careers.

Glavine is a better option than Silva. Even at 41, he's better than Silva. Silva is only going to get worse. Mark my words. By the 3rd year in his contract he'll be dumped.
 
Nobody cares about the Red Sox opening the MLB season in Tokyo vs Oakland huh?
 
Glavine is a better option than Silva. Even at 41, he's better than Silva. Silva could easily be replaced by a pitching machine. The pitching machine would probably put up better stats.

not at this point in his career he's not. maybe 5 years ago, but glavine doesn't have much left in his tank. his velocity is way down and it was never great to begin with. it's funny, you claim that silva gave up a ton of homers and hits had a high batting average against, but look how they compared to glavine's numbers last year, with innings pitched, walks and ground ball/fly ball ratios thrown in:

  • silva: 202(IP) 20(HRs) 229(hits) 36(BBs) .287(BA) 1.57(GB/FB)
  • glavine: 200.1(IP) 23(HRs) 219(hits) 64(BBs) .281(BA) 1.18(GB/FB)

silva and glavine pitched roughly the same amount of innings last year, and while silva gave up 10 more hits, he walked almost half as many as glavine while giving up fewer home runs and getting a lot more ground balls, all while having to face much better hitters in the AL and playing in a better hitter's park than glavine. like neyer mentioned in his article, throw silva in the NL with a good defense behind him and he's pretty good pitcher, maybe even a fringe all-star.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,481
Messages
22,117,248
Members
45,907
Latest member
zorKiraa
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"